stu_the_red wrote:dawson99 wrote:that is well thought out stu, but i wonder where u got your stats from? personal opinion?
thats all well and good, thats the whole point of football, personal opinion. Thats why chelski prefer lamps and we prefer gerrard. We may prefer fowler because we were not happy with owens exit.
The one fact i do know is that the person fowler was alot more interesting than the person owen. and that adds a lot to legend status.
Also we all know that barring injury fowler was the best finisher we had. And when he first linked up with rushie it was a truly magificent sight to see.
Personally i woulda liked to see them play together, but that will never happen. Personlly i prefer fowler, but im not gonna get into a pi$$ing contest over it
Owen and Fowler disliked each other.
The two of them couldn't remain professional so something had to give. The better player stayed.
The two of them could have and should have been the strike partnership this club had ever seen. They should have been better than Rush and Dalglish. They had the ability. I don't give a what anyone says, they could have been better and its a crime that they weren't.
The management as well as the players were to blame.
Saying that brings your football knowledge into question. Dalglish/Rush is not just the best partnership in English football, but the best in the world for mine.
You either dont know your football or you never saw them play together.
Ian Rush was the deadliest finisher in football. Dalglish was the best all round player in his day.
Nothing compares