Arsenal - liverpool. sat 5 april - Premier league, ko 12.45

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby 66-1112520797 » Sun Apr 06, 2008 1:45 pm

title but for rotation, which as I've said (IMO) is utter :censored:.


Why then ?

Or wht is it largely down to ?
66-1112520797
 

Postby LFC2007 » Sun Apr 06, 2008 1:46 pm

We used many a midfield combo, many a striker combo, numerous players were used in that period.

It's not my theory to disprove so I have no need to drag up the comparitive stat's, you're welcome to.
User avatar
LFC2007
 
Posts: 7706
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: London

Postby LFC2007 » Sun Apr 06, 2008 1:50 pm

Bamaga man wrote:
title but for rotation, which as I've said (IMO) is utter :censored:.


Why then ?

Or wht is it largely down to ?

Numrous factors in varying proportions, the quality of the squad springs to my mind as one of the most pertinent factors - particularly quality on the wings, quality full backs who can overlap, and never ever having a striker of the Owen (because he wanted top leave), Fowler (because he was well past his best), Torres (because we couldn't afford him or anyone of his level of quality at the time) calibre in their prime, until now.
User avatar
LFC2007
 
Posts: 7706
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: London

Postby 66-1112520797 » Sun Apr 06, 2008 1:51 pm

LFC2007 wrote:We used many a midfield combo, many a striker combo, numerous players were used in that period.

It's not my theory to disprove so I have no need to drag up the comparitive stat's, you're welcome to.

Simple then rotation works !

If t\you wanna finnish fourth year after year, obviously LFC2007 your happy with that.  ???
66-1112520797
 

Postby LFC2007 » Sun Apr 06, 2008 1:52 pm

Bamaga man wrote:
LFC2007 wrote:We used many a midfield combo, many a striker combo, numerous players were used in that period.

It's not my theory to disprove so I have no need to drag up the comparitive stat's, you're welcome to.

Simple then rotation works !

If t\you wanna finnish fourth year after year, obviously LFC2007 your happy with that.  ???

???
User avatar
LFC2007
 
Posts: 7706
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: London

Postby 66-1112520797 » Sun Apr 06, 2008 1:52 pm

LFC2007 wrote:
Bamaga man wrote:
title but for rotation, which as I've said (IMO) is utter :censored:.


Why then ?

Or wht is it largely down to ?

Numrous factors in varying proportions, the quality of the squad springs to my mind as one of the most pertinent factors - particularly quality on the wings, quality full backs who can overlap, and never ever having a striker of the Owen (because he wanted top leave), Fowler (because he was well past his best), Torres (because we couldn't afford it) calibre in their prime, until now.

Oh yes and thats not Rafas fault either is it.
66-1112520797
 

Postby 112-1077774096 » Sun Apr 06, 2008 1:54 pm

LFC2007 wrote:We used many a midfield combo, many a striker combo, numerous players were used in that period.

It's not my theory to disprove so I have no need to drag up the comparitive stat's, you're welcome to.

well you are the one questioning my comment so i guess we can just accept I am right or you would disprove it, just like wih my job eh?

:laugh:

i love the way you backpedal when you know you are wrong and if you think you are right you back up what you say with stats etc
112-1077774096
 

Postby LFC2007 » Sun Apr 06, 2008 1:54 pm

Bamaga man wrote:
LFC2007 wrote:
Bamaga man wrote:
title but for rotation, which as I've said (IMO) is utter :censored:.


Why then ?

Or wht is it largely down to ?

Numrous factors in varying proportions, the quality of the squad springs to my mind as one of the most pertinent factors - particularly quality on the wings, quality full backs who can overlap, and never ever having a striker of the Owen (because he wanted top leave), Fowler (because he was well past his best), Torres (because we couldn't afford it) calibre in their prime, until now.

Oh yes and thats not Rafas fault either is it.

Sarcasm at its worst.
User avatar
LFC2007
 
Posts: 7706
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: London

Postby 112-1077774096 » Sun Apr 06, 2008 1:56 pm

yeah he spent 150million but we couldnt afford torres until now   :D
112-1077774096
 

Postby LFC2007 » Sun Apr 06, 2008 1:59 pm

peewee wrote:
LFC2007 wrote:We used many a midfield combo, many a striker combo, numerous players were used in that period.

It's not my theory to disprove so I have no need to drag up the comparitive stat's, you're welcome to.

well you are the one questioning my comment so i guess we can just accept I am right or you would disprove it, just like wih my job eh?

:laugh:

i love the way you backpedal when you know you are wrong and if you think you are right you back up what you say with stats etc

It's not my theory to disprove, as I've said I don't subscribe to the view that we would have challenged but for rotation.

I know we used various midfield/attacking combo's in that period, that I know.

I don't know the comparitive stat's because it's not for me to prove that rotation/"Rafa style" doesn't work and inhibit consistency, and hence our ability to challenge for the title.

Even if you were to provide the stat's, it would form merely one dimension in analysing a period in which we were consistent.

TBH, I don't know about you or your job, but I know vice-presidents don't do 'Peewee behaviour', that much I can deduce.

yeah he spent 150million but we couldnt afford torres until now


Correct.
User avatar
LFC2007
 
Posts: 7706
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: London

Postby 66-1112520797 » Sun Apr 06, 2008 2:01 pm

LFC2007 wrote:
Bamaga man wrote:
LFC2007 wrote:
Bamaga man wrote:
title but for rotation, which as I've said (IMO) is utter :censored:.


Why then ?

Or wht is it largely down to ?

Numrous factors in varying proportions, the quality of the squad springs to my mind as one of the most pertinent factors - particularly quality on the wings, quality full backs who can overlap, and never ever having a striker of the Owen (because he wanted top leave), Fowler (because he was well past his best), Torres (because we couldn't afford it) calibre in their prime, until now.

Oh yes and thats not Rafas fault either is it.

Sarcasm at its worst.

I learned from the worst.  :;):
66-1112520797
 

Postby NANNY RED » Sun Apr 06, 2008 2:03 pm

Do yous three want room service :laugh:

Image
HE WHO BETRAYS WILL ALWAYS WALK ALONE
User avatar
NANNY RED
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13334
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 12:45 pm

Postby 66-1112520797 » Sun Apr 06, 2008 2:04 pm

I don't know the comparitive stat's because it's not for me to prove that rotation/"Rafa style" doesn't work and breed consistency


well consiidering you seem a staunch suporter of this method, try and prove how rotation does work ?

Not just in theory but from what we've seen of it and our end standings at the end of each season.
66-1112520797
 

Postby 66-1112520797 » Sun Apr 06, 2008 2:06 pm

NANNY RED wrote:Do yous three want room service :laugh:

Image

Theres five there doll.

I only want the service if your offering.  :;):
66-1112520797
 

Postby LFC2007 » Sun Apr 06, 2008 2:07 pm

It's old ground Bamaga, I'm not going to repeat myself in every thread. If you wish, PM me if you're that interested - I'm sure if you asked nicely I could provide you with a few links to threads containing the relevant information.
User avatar
LFC2007
 
Posts: 7706
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: London

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 35 guests