Jimmy the Weasel wrote:So in layman's terms, you would rather have a worse player than a better one?




Jimmy the Weasel wrote:So in layman's terms, you would rather have a worse player than a better one?
Yooj Bigullz wrote:GYBS wrote:in my opinion i woldnt want berbatov at liverpool , never rated him that highly since his days at bayer . simple as that .
Even though he managed to equal Dirks first season tally?
(I wont mention goals scored since)
maypaxvobiscum Posted on Sep. 24 2008,22:21
Quote (burjennio @ Sep. 24 2008,22:16)
Quote
so anyone who feels kuyt isnt good enough is a WUM? and his points are bullsh!t? and who are you to tell him if he's gonna have to find another message board to cry on when idiots like you are the ones giving such moronic replies thus causing people to respond aggresively? credit to Jimmy for not using vulgarities or making snide remarks at people's credibility as a fan.
completely change around what I said to suit your own points kids. Not using vulgarities but insulting me time and time again when i try to keep it about football is fine then? The WUM and banning comments where because of these statements not anything to do with your football views. But keep your mouthing up, its good to see your spine's regrown Maxipad after your grovelling PM apology the last time I had to put you in your place. I'll not be insulted by anyone, so either keep it civil oroff
i got a card cause of you. you spewed off so much sh!t and told me and Stu to stop sucking each others c0cks and i got a card for my response while u get away scot free. tell you what b!tch, if you're really half the man you make yourself to be, you would have more guts then just sitting behind your pc in your cheap house making spineless threats knowing that no one could harm you in the safety of your sad home. now, off.
ps: i offered an apology for my reply but after seeing what you replied...i thought and i still think you're a cnut.
Jimmy the Weasel wrote:GYBS wrote:maypaxvobiscum wrote:kuyt isnt a cr@p player he just isnt good enough for the first team. madrid and manure were chasing berba. even man city. and who bothered about kuyt? he doesnt have the brilliance to win a game on his own. he doesnt have flair. he loses the ball far too often. he mayb have given that pass to babel but who couldnt? if that pass was so difficult to make then that person shouldnt be playing football. i think most of us want a player who does more then just hard work. i would rather have a lazy fecker who has higher chances of scoring then one who does so much hard wok but has so little to show for it. you win games by points via goals scored...not who ran the most.
and remind me again how berbatov has done at spurs in the last two seasons ?
He's done pretty well hasn't he? Well enough to convince Man Utd that they should pay out £30m for him.
Regardless of your own opinion of the valuation (you could argue that Taggart's opinion is more valid, maybe) do you think anyone would pay £30m for Kuyt right now?
GYBS wrote:i would rather have kuyt than berbatov . i dont rate berbatov as highly as some . think he is decent but nowhere near world class or worth 30 mil .
s@int wrote:Jimmy the Weasel wrote:So in layman's terms, you would rather have a worse player than a better one?![]()
![]()
nice one
GYBS wrote:Yooj Bigullz wrote:GYBS wrote:Yooj Bigullz wrote:GYBS wrote:Finances and repercussions count for a lot more on the pitch than you state . if it wasnt for finances we may not have players like torres and masher in the squad so the goal was a bit more important than that . and how cares if it came of his shin ? did torres or keane score that night ? 30 odd million pounds worth of strikers ?
once agian kuyt not getting credit where its deserved
You miss my point. Of course finances are important
I doubt it featured much in the team talk though
i expect getting an important goal featured thou didnt it ?
I imagine getting a goal would have been mentioned (same way it would have done in the numerous league games he's failed to score in) He scored, well done
I'm not whipping myself into a frenzy as to what that might or might not prove though
Very limited player
yet you dismiss it as meaning nothing about the player .
Jimmy the Weasel wrote:So in layman's terms, you would rather have a worse player than a better one?
GYBS wrote:Jimmy the Weasel wrote:So in layman's terms, you would rather have a worse player than a better one?
nope - i think berbatov is very skillful and looks lovely on the ball and is techincally better than kuyt but would rather have kuyt for what he brings to the whole team with the whole package with his teamwork and ethics and his workrate and his ability to cover different areas , back up the full back , defend from the front . work his feckingof for the whole ninety mins and put his whole heart and soul into playing for liverpool as opposed to someone who plays just for themselves.
burjennio wrote:maypaxvobiscum Posted on Sep. 24 2008,22:21
Quote (burjennio @ Sep. 24 2008,22:16)
Quote
so anyone who feels kuyt isnt good enough is a WUM? and his points are bullsh!t? and who are you to tell him if he's gonna have to find another message board to cry on when idiots like you are the ones giving such moronic replies thus causing people to respond aggresively? credit to Jimmy for not using vulgarities or making snide remarks at people's credibility as a fan.
completely change around what I said to suit your own points kids. Not using vulgarities but insulting me time and time again when i try to keep it about football is fine then? The WUM and banning comments where because of these statements not anything to do with your football views. But keep your mouthing up, its good to see your spine's regrown Maxipad after your grovelling PM apology the last time I had to put you in your place. I'll not be insulted by anyone, so either keep it civil oroff
i got a card cause of you. you spewed off so much sh!t and told me and Stu to stop sucking each others c0cks and i got a card for my response while u get away scot free. tell you what, if you're really half the man you make yourself to be, you would have more guts then just sitting behind your pc making spineless threats knowing that no one could harm you in the safety of your sad home.
ps: i offered an apology for my reply but after seeing what you replied...i thought and i still think you're a cnut.
i dont believe you understand the difference between menot being serious using creative combacks and pop culture remarks (see pulp fiction) and the fact that all you have is a keyboard, a bad attitude, and remedial class in about 10 hours
Jimmy the Weasel wrote:GYBS wrote:Jimmy the Weasel wrote:So in layman's terms, you would rather have a worse player than a better one?
nope - i think berbatov is very skillful and looks lovely on the ball and is techincally better than kuyt but would rather have kuyt for what he brings to the whole team with the whole package with his teamwork and ethics and his workrate and his ability to cover different areas , back up the full back , defend from the front . work his feckingof for the whole ninety mins and put his whole heart and soul into playing for liverpool as opposed to someone who plays just for themselves.
Is Berbatov a better footballer than Kuyt or not?
s@int wrote:Berbatov Total P. League goals 27 Assists 19
Kuyt Total P. League goals 15 Assists 9
GYBS wrote:Jimmy the Weasel wrote:GYBS wrote:Jimmy the Weasel wrote:So in layman's terms, you would rather have a worse player than a better one?
nope - i think berbatov is very skillful and looks lovely on the ball and is techincally better than kuyt but would rather have kuyt for what he brings to the whole team with the whole package with his teamwork and ethics and his workrate and his ability to cover different areas , back up the full back , defend from the front . work his feckingof for the whole ninety mins and put his whole heart and soul into playing for liverpool as opposed to someone who plays just for themselves.
Is Berbatov a better footballer than Kuyt or not?
better striker - yes .
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests