, i'm torn between both
, i'm torn between both

peewee wrote:I can't believe we are trying to compare kuyt with torres now.
peewee wrote:but heimdall is right, he was still sh1t when he was up front.

ConnO'var wrote:peewee wrote:but heimdall is right, he was still sh1t when he was up front.
Disagree here, mate.
Actually, in his earlier games, when deployed upfront in a conventional 4-4-2 with Crouch, he was quite decent. Didn't exactly move the earth but decent nonetheless, imo.

peewee wrote:ConnO'var wrote:peewee wrote:but heimdall is right, he was still sh1t when he was up front.
Disagree here, mate.
Actually, in his earlier games, when deployed upfront in a conventional 4-4-2 with Crouch, he was quite decent. Didn't exactly move the earth but decent nonetheless, imo.
its depends what we both class as sh1t mate


ConnO'var wrote:peewee wrote:ConnO'var wrote:peewee wrote:but heimdall is right, he was still sh1t when he was up front.
Disagree here, mate.
Actually, in his earlier games, when deployed upfront in a conventional 4-4-2 with Crouch, he was quite decent. Didn't exactly move the earth but decent nonetheless, imo.
its depends what we both class as sh1t mate![]()
Greasy Sh!te = C Ronaldo?![]()









heimdall wrote:Yes but who would you rather have on the right wing?
My point is that Kuyt is sh1t for a team like Liverpool who has aspirations of challenging for the league, if he went to a bottom of the table club then he'd probably be ok.

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 39 guests