by stmichael » Thu Apr 26, 2007 1:37 pm
Its no good having a "20 a season" striker if the rest of the team provide no ammo. Last night we created very little. The connection here? Not enough creative midfielders or attacking playmakers. Its very easy.
Could anyone in midfield provide a change of pace (a la Kaka) to open things up, some pace on the wings, or quick creative feet in the centre of midfield? No. Gerrard was too often wandering in from the right, Zenden has no pace and therefore can't provide a supply line, Pennant wasn't played to accomodate Gerrard, so once again we had Alonso and Mascerano in the centre neither of whom has enough trickery or turn of pace to create a play or opening that far up the pitch (but otherwise are excellent in the roles they play generally).
Our balance still isn't right, and we do not have enough creativity or a player to take a chance on something.
However, do Chelsea play the kind of football you would expect to achieve from an expenditure of £500,000,000.00? No. It was surprisingly long-ball at times.
We can still turn this around with some positivity at Anfield. But a 1-0 reverse and no away goals makes it dodgy. Could you imagine it at Anfield if we were 2-0 up with 5 mins to play and Chelsea are piling on the pressure? I don't even want to think about it.
I think a 20 a goals a season striker is a fallacy.