by bigmick » Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:04 pm
It seems to me that far from the "moaners" overreacting, it's people who are springing to the defense of anything criticised whoa re getting themselves all worked up. I haven't seen anybody saying the manager should be sacked, or the team should be sold. A few people have ventured the opinion that they are now coming to the conclusion that we won't win the title, but that's hardly an over-reaction surely?
If we don't win the title, we'll all come to that conclusion sooner or later. Some will go for the "it's still mathematically possible" angle as they do every year, while for others if we fall eight or ten points behind either or both of the Mancs or Chelsea, they'll realise it's most unlikely we'll come back from there. For my part, I was of the opinion that we were and are well and truly involved in the title race once we'd won at Chelsea, and I think we still are. This one result doesn't change that, but it does make it more unlikely that we'll win it. How much more unlikely is a moot point, but each time you fail to beat lesser opposition at Home, you know you are making that mountain which you'll need to climb ever steeper. A couple more results like the one today, and IMHO we'll be gone for all money. Already should Chelsea win tomorrow we'll be two points back, and a defeat at the Emirates would leave us if not quite needing snookers, at least under severe pressure.
Games like the Hull at home, Stoke at Home, West Ham at Home, Fulham at Home are the ones where you build up your insurance policy. These are the games in which you need to be taking 10 points out of 12, not 4. My opinion is that given the fact we had 31 million quids worth of strikers on the bench (not my valuation, Rafa's) and we needed a winning goal, we should have brought at least one of them on to play up front. Football's a simpler game than it's made out sometimes.
"se e in una bottigla ed e bianco, e latte".