lakes10 wrote:LFC2007 wrote:I'm not sure. If it isn't true then it's a major journalistic blunder by Maddock, one that he'd be remembered for. On the other hand, he does seem to have a bit of the Lakes about him in the sense that he thrives on turning out exclusives, and generally talks b0llocks. It certainly came out of the blue though. Would've thought a decision would have been made in the course of the meetings they had a few weeks back.
Its not come out of the blue.
i have been asked to step away from posting my media info on her by the mods.
the meetings were not what they seemed a few weeks ago and Rafa getting his agent to contact inter did not go down well with the club.
big players telling the club they did not wish to still be hear next season if Rafa was the manager also did not go down well.
SG JC having a bust up with Rafa during half time of a live tv game tells you how bad this got at this club this year with Rafa and the players.
The mod's probably asked you to give it rest because the majority of the time you try and pass off your suppositions as fact and it quite often stirs the pot.
"The board have said.., Rafa's agent is in discussions with..., Rafa is looking for..., "Gerrard had a bust up with Rafa in the dressing room..." Montse doesn't like Rafa's goatee".
These are the types of statements you make and subsequently use as premises for other suppositions.
Here's a tip: It's always helpful to be skeptical when you come to interpret information, but especially information from third party sources. Why? Because you're relying on someone else's interpretation of events, who in turn may be relying on another person's interpretation of events, and where there is a motive to produce a story even more so. It would be helpful to all if you started to show some appreciation for the limits of knowledge.
by 