Liverpool FC Forum

maypaxvobiscum wrote:SS - lennon, bentley, swp, and the list goes on i cant be arsed to note it all down.

tonyeh wrote:

supersub wrote:

tonyeh wrote:He may "work his balls off" and get some "important" (and cheap        ) goals, but this is outweighed by his many limitations.

.

important......cheap goals

now there's a contradiction in terms

another knob.head stuck to the armchair throwover

What? ? ?

I give an honest opinion and get called a knob.head? 

    just an honest opinion...whats you problem?

maypaxvobiscum wrote:i said much better options. i DIDNT say IN OUR SQUAD.

maypaxvobiscum wrote:

GYBS wrote:

maypaxvobiscum wrote:

GYBS wrote:

maypaxvobiscum wrote:SS - lennon, bentley, swp, and the list goes on i cant be arsed to note it all down.

GYBS - did i say in our squad?

Emerald - torres makes up for it by scoring much much more the kuyt can ever dream of

well they arent in our squad are they so no point really talking about them doing a better job than kuyt . you could mention messi etc blah blah but means nothing .

FFS you're really blind are you?
i said much better options. i DIDNT say IN OUR SQUAD.

well of course there is better options in the world , pretty much better options to every player bar gerrarda nd torres maybe but its what is in our squad is what we have to use and its what we can afford and what we can realisticlly buy - anything else is just football manager syndrome

so then perhaps the transfer window can just stay shut since we're all gonna do with what we have and dont need improvements since there is nothing we cna afford.

well how do you know they will improve us ? 1.SWP - we never had a chance to get him .2. Bently ? yeah he is really pulling up trees at spurs at the moment . 3 . Lennon - chances of spurs letting us having another important player of theirs ?? nil .


Next on your list is who ?

supersub wrote:

maypaxvobiscum wrote:i said much better options. i DIDNT say IN OUR SQUAD.

If they are in other teams squads , then in my book it's hardly a better option....

maypaxvobiscum wrote:

supersub wrote:

maypaxvobiscum wrote:i said much better options. i DIDNT say IN OUR SQUAD.

If they are in other teams squads , then in my book it's hardly a better option....

just to tell you in secret...you're having your rose-tinted glasses on.

why is he having rose tinted specs on by saying players who arent in our sqaud cant really be called better options cause we cant actually play them thats called being realistic ? and not playing football manager

SupitsJonF wrote:We did have a chance to get SWP, we said we weren't interested.  At least thats what I heard.

got told this summer we did have a chance but price was close to 20 mil and have never been able to afford it .

GYBS wrote:

maypaxvobiscum wrote:

supersub wrote:

maypaxvobiscum wrote:i said much better options. i DIDNT say IN OUR SQUAD.

If they are in other teams squads , then in my book it's hardly a better option....

just to tell you in secret...you're having your rose-tinted glasses on.

why is he having rose tinted specs on by saying players who arent in our sqaud cant really be called better options cause we cant actually play them thats called being realistic ? and not playing football manager

you keep on harping on and on about how this and that is playing football manager...im done with it. go yourself.

maypaxvobiscum wrote:just to tell you in secret...you're having your rose-tinted glasses on.

just comment on facts not fantasy

maypaxvobiscum wrote:oh and GYBS, before you come up with ur trademark line of ''is there any way u can post without insulting'', i said it before, go yourself. you're, in my opinion, thick, stubborn and talking to you is senseless.

maypaxvobiscum wrote:playing football manager...im done with it. go yourself.