INTER MILAN vs LIVERPOOL: CL-11/03/08 - 2nd Leg - Build up and Match Discussion

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby woof woof ! » Mon Mar 10, 2008 11:56 pm

username wrote:
woof woof ! wrote:
god_bless_john_houlding wrote:Tomorrow will be 1-1.

Gerrard with the goal for us, couldn't give a toss about their scorer.

I still see us dropping this 4-2-3-1 formation though, I think it's more likely to be 4-1-4-1. With Kuyt down the right, Riise down the left, Gerrard and Lucas in the middle with Mascheranho just in front of the back four of Arbeloa, Carra, Hyypia and Aurellio. Torres up front on his own. Defensive minded but I couldn't care less as long as we go through.

We're off to Moscow in a couple of months time (with a Premiership title under our belt :D )

Appreciate the sentiment but Hyypia instead of Skrtel and Lucas alongside Mascherano worries me.

Why? Hyppia is still up for it and lucas played with mascha in the first leg (or did everyone forget that?)

Don't want to knock Sammi, his performances this season have been beyond expectations, but Skrtel looks to be settling in and playing well , I'm concerned that at some stage Sammi will get done for pace, sod's law he'll play and score from a corner , in which case I'll look like a mug , but an extremely happy mug.  :D

As for Lucas, I'm far from convinced . Yeah , the fella has loads of potential and of course with Alonso out Rafa's options may be limited, but Lucas just still seems to be a bit lightweight (imo), and to answer your question ,

lucas played with mascha in the first leg (or did everyone forget that?)


yeah I forgot, thats how much of an impression he made on me.
Image

Image
User avatar
woof woof !
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 21225
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:22 am
Location: Here There and Everywhere

Postby god_bless_john_houlding » Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:00 am

LFC2007 wrote:
god_bless_john_houlding wrote:
Dundalk wrote:How good would it be if we score in the first 5 mins of the match.

The tie would be more or less put to bed there and then and I could relax a bit more and let my nails grow a bit

I think that would be worse Dundalk, the lads themselves would sit back and invite more pressure onto us. The longer it's 0-0 the better for us IMO.

I think I'm right in thinking the away goal on comes into affect after extra time? Well if it does, it'll give them 85 minutes to get the three goals back (possible as Liverpool know) and then they're flying high for those 30 mins of extra time to score just one.

No I think it's better that it stays 0-0 for as long as possible.

Right, it's better that we don't score early because for them, having to score four is easier to overturn than just two.

Yes. Well done. Give yourself a gold star.
1) You'll Never Walk Alone
2) pass and move is the Liverpool groove
3) FIRST WILL ALWAYS BE FIRST AND SECOND WILL ALWAYS BE NOTHING.
4) If Torres has scored 60 league goals for Liverpool by the start of the 2011/12 season, I'll say he's better than Owen.
User avatar
god_bless_john_houlding
 
Posts: 2694
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:14 pm
Location: Liverpool

Postby LFC2007 » Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:05 am

god_bless_john_houlding wrote:
LFC2007 wrote:
god_bless_john_houlding wrote:
Dundalk wrote:How good would it be if we score in the first 5 mins of the match.

The tie would be more or less put to bed there and then and I could relax a bit more and let my nails grow a bit

I think that would be worse Dundalk, the lads themselves would sit back and invite more pressure onto us. The longer it's 0-0 the better for us IMO.

I think I'm right in thinking the away goal on comes into affect after extra time? Well if it does, it'll give them 85 minutes to get the three goals back (possible as Liverpool know) and then they're flying high for those 30 mins of extra time to score just one.

No I think it's better that it stays 0-0 for as long as possible.

Right, it's better that we don't score early because for them, having to score four is easier to overturn than just two.

Yes. Well done. Give yourself a gold star.

Will do.
User avatar
LFC2007
 
Posts: 7706
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: London

Postby woof woof ! » Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:12 am

god_bless_john_houlding wrote:I think I'm right in thinking the away goal on comes into affect after extra time? Well if it does, it'll give them 85 minutes to get the three goals back (possible as Liverpool know) and then they're flying high for those 30 mins of extra time to score just one.

No I think it's better that it stays 0-0 for as long as possible.

What the f'uck are you on ?

whats wrong with it remaining 0-1

"for as long as possible" ?



???
Image

Image
User avatar
woof woof !
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 21225
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:22 am
Location: Here There and Everywhere

Postby god_bless_john_houlding » Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:26 am

woof woof ! wrote:
god_bless_john_houlding wrote:I think I'm right in thinking the away goal on comes into affect after extra time? Well if it does, it'll give them 85 minutes to get the three goals back (possible as Liverpool know) and then they're flying high for those 30 mins of extra time to score just one.

No I think it's better that it stays 0-0 for as long as possible.

What the f'uck are you on ?

whats wrong with it remaining 0-1

"for as long as possible" ?



???

If we take an early lead, it'll cause complancency at the back. They'll go gung ho and it'll be wave after wave after wave of attack.

1-0 in the opening minutes of the second half, would be ideal, but in the opening minutes of the first no. People and players would assume we'd won and take their foot off the pedal.

Obviously it could work out to be perfect as well, but I still think that taking a lead to early, could actually be the downfall, because at 2-0 down they're going to think they're still in the game so they won't be throwing caution to the win, giving our defenders less hassle. 3-0 down, causes panic at the back, and our defense hasn't be great this year.
1) You'll Never Walk Alone
2) pass and move is the Liverpool groove
3) FIRST WILL ALWAYS BE FIRST AND SECOND WILL ALWAYS BE NOTHING.
4) If Torres has scored 60 league goals for Liverpool by the start of the 2011/12 season, I'll say he's better than Owen.
User avatar
god_bless_john_houlding
 
Posts: 2694
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:14 pm
Location: Liverpool

Postby redtrader74 » Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:28 am

If we scored early and first then its game over, they would need four goals, if they scored 3 we would still go through. Its the BEST thing that could happen.
User avatar
redtrader74
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 1551
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: London

Postby Dundalk » Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:29 am

LFC2007 wrote:
god_bless_john_houlding wrote:
LFC2007 wrote:
god_bless_john_houlding wrote:
Dundalk wrote:How good would it be if we score in the first 5 mins of the match.

The tie would be more or less put to bed there and then and I could relax a bit more and let my nails grow a bit

I think that would be worse Dundalk, the lads themselves would sit back and invite more pressure onto us. The longer it's 0-0 the better for us IMO.

I think I'm right in thinking the away goal on comes into affect after extra time? Well if it does, it'll give them 85 minutes to get the three goals back (possible as Liverpool know) and then they're flying high for those 30 mins of extra time to score just one.

No I think it's better that it stays 0-0 for as long as possible.

Right, it's better that we don't score early because for them, having to score four is easier to overturn than just two.

Yes. Well done. Give yourself a gold star.

Will do.

Can i have one too?  :devil:
User avatar
Dundalk
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 14767
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 9:46 am
Location: Dundalk

Postby LFC2007 » Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:34 am

Dundalk wrote:
LFC2007 wrote:
god_bless_john_houlding wrote:
LFC2007 wrote:
god_bless_john_houlding wrote:
Dundalk wrote:How good would it be if we score in the first 5 mins of the match.

The tie would be more or less put to bed there and then and I could relax a bit more and let my nails grow a bit

I think that would be worse Dundalk, the lads themselves would sit back and invite more pressure onto us. The longer it's 0-0 the better for us IMO.

I think I'm right in thinking the away goal on comes into affect after extra time? Well if it does, it'll give them 85 minutes to get the three goals back (possible as Liverpool know) and then they're flying high for those 30 mins of extra time to score just one.

No I think it's better that it stays 0-0 for as long as possible.

Right, it's better that we don't score early because for them, having to score four is easier to overturn than just two.

Yes. Well done. Give yourself a gold star.

Will do.

Can i have one too?  :devil:

In the post  :D
User avatar
LFC2007
 
Posts: 7706
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: London

Postby LFC2007 » Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:41 am

god_bless_john_houlding wrote:
woof woof ! wrote:
god_bless_john_houlding wrote:I think I'm right in thinking the away goal on comes into affect after extra time? Well if it does, it'll give them 85 minutes to get the three goals back (possible as Liverpool know) and then they're flying high for those 30 mins of extra time to score just one.

No I think it's better that it stays 0-0 for as long as possible.

What the f'uck are you on ?

whats wrong with it remaining 0-1

"for as long as possible" ?



???

If we take an early lead, it'll cause complancency at the back. They'll go gung ho and it'll be wave after wave after wave of attack.

1-0 in the opening minutes of the second half, would be ideal, but in the opening minutes of the first no. People and players would assume we'd won and take their foot off the pedal.

Obviously it could work out to be perfect as well, but I still think that taking a lead to early, could actually be the downfall, because at 2-0 down they're going to think they're still in the game so they won't be throwing caution to the win, giving our defenders less hassle. 3-0 down, causes panic at the back, and our defense hasn't be great this year.

Or (if you're not a cadbury fruit and nut), scoring an early goal could allow us to set our stall out and play the perfect counter-attacking game. They'd have to go gung-ho against one of the most astute defences in Europe. They'd have to score four, it's possible, but highly unlikely against such a well-drilled team. Torres, Gerrard and most likely Babel playing on the counter attack against a make-shift Milan defence would be very difficult to cope with.
User avatar
LFC2007
 
Posts: 7706
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: London

Postby NANNY RED » Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:41 am

I should be gonna bed really cause early start tomorrow but im two exited now ive done us for 2-0 with Torres first scorer if that comes in my trips paid for .

I wanna gild star to go on my generals hat for my war with Hicks :laugh:
HE WHO BETRAYS WILL ALWAYS WALK ALONE
User avatar
NANNY RED
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13334
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 12:45 pm

Postby redtrader74 » Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:43 am

Right, prediction time for me, i think we will surprise them and go after them in the first 10 minutes, and get an early goal, i know some may think that scoring is bad for us  :upside:  but i think it can be helpful in a football match, and believe we will and the game will finish 1-1, maybe 2-1 if they get desperate and we hit them on the counter.  Hope I'm right on either count.
User avatar
redtrader74
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 1551
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: London

Postby account deleted by request » Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:46 am

god_bless_john_houlding wrote:
Dundalk wrote:How good would it be if we score in the first 5 mins of the match.

The tie would be more or less put to bed there and then and I could relax a bit more and let my nails grow a bit

I think that would be worse Dundalk, the lads themselves would sit back and invite more pressure onto us. The longer it's 0-0 the better for us IMO.

I think I'm right in thinking the away goal on comes into affect after extra time? Well if it does, it'll give them 85 minutes to get the three goals back (possible as Liverpool know) and then they're flying high for those 30 mins of extra time to score just one.

No I think it's better that it stays 0-0 for as long as possible.

No mate the away goals rule comes into effect at full time, not just after extra time. Reason I know is I went against Vitoria Setubal (first time we got knocked out on away goals) and stood there for ages waiting for extra-time.
Last edited by account deleted by request on Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
account deleted by request
 
Posts: 20690
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:11 am

Postby Dundalk » Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:57 am

Rafael Benitez has insisted that his Liverpool side will go out to the San Siro and attack Inter Milan. Of course if we get 1 goal Inter Milan have to score 4 goals if they are to advance, so it is vitally important that we don’t sit back and wait for the Italians to come at us.

“We were considering different options because maybe we have some players that they cannot cope with or manage,” said Benitez.

“We will analyze how the team does in the training session tonight and then we will see. We know that we cannot defend for a long time against a good team so we need to attack and score if that is possible.

“I have a lot of confidence we can go forward so my idea is to prepare properly and to win.” he added.

“I think that we know Torres is on fire and his understanding with Gerrard is good, the team is playing well now so we have confidence and we know that at the end of the day you need to score and Torres can be the key man for us.”
User avatar
Dundalk
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 14767
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 9:46 am
Location: Dundalk

Postby account deleted by request » Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:02 am

Dundalk wrote:Rafael Benitez has insisted that his Liverpool side will go out to the San Siro and attack Inter Milan. Of course if we get 1 goal Inter Milan have to score 4 goals if they are to advance, so it is vitally important that we don’t sit back and wait for the Italians to come at us.

“We were considering different options because maybe we have some players that they cannot cope with or manage,” said Benitez.

“We will analyze how the team does in the training session tonight and then we will see. We know that we cannot defend for a long time against a good team so we need to attack and score if that is possible.

“I have a lot of confidence we can go forward so my idea is to prepare properly and to win.” he added.

“I think that we know Torres is on fire and his understanding with Gerrard is good, the team is playing well now so we have confidence and we know that at the end of the day you need to score and Torres can be the key man for us.”

Maybe he's talking about Crouch? They panicked every time the ball went near him at Anfield.
account deleted by request
 
Posts: 20690
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:11 am

Postby Scottbot » Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:16 am

Just hope he resists the temptation to play Carra at Right-back in the absence of Finnan. He MUST play at Centre-half.
User avatar
Scottbot
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 4919
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: Winchester, Hampshire

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 71 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e