LFC2007 wrote:In response to the question of Torres playing today;
To quote Rafa on Torres’ substitution against Chelsea;
“He had problems in his hamstring. When I asked him he said he felt something so I needed to change him.”
So Torres signalled the injury – to which Rafa responded dutifully. If kept on, he may have been caused further problems which could have left him out for up to 6 weeks - in the short-term potentially ruling him out of the Euro’s, and longer-term making him more susceptible to recurrences of the problem – as happened with Owen.
In a game in which you’ve just gone 2-1 down, is it worth risking your second best player by leaving him on, even if he is signalling a problem?
It’s not as if Rafa pulled him off for a laugh, Torres indicated he felt a problem, so he took him off.
He’s not a medical expert, if the player signals a problem, and he’s a vital player – you take him off.
Rafa can only go by what the player is telling him, and what the physio’s are recommending. Hamstring problems are only ever ‘suspected’, they can only be confirmed after an MRI scan, so the decision is taken there and then on the bench. If it later turns out to be a very minor, and swiftly treatable strain, you’re thankful you took him off.
The decision to play him today would indicate that it was either a very minor strain, or a suspected strain that didn’t turn out to be a problem.
If you are of the opinion that Rafa was “styling” (or that he should have ignored what Torres and his physio’s had said), what effect would Torres staying on have had on Chelsea scoring a third just a few minutes later anyway?
Source ?
or you making this up you dumb witted M0R0N....
M0R0N.......