Liverpool FC Forum

Igor Zidane wrote:Wasn't particulary @rsed about tonight if i'm honest and i'm even less @rsed now. What does that tell you about my feelings for the club at the minute. You've all got to get it into your skulls THIS IS NOT LFC anymore. We have a bigger fight than what's going on on the pitch . I'm f.ucked if i'm gonna let this club turn into newcastle united ffs. Roy needs are backing and the shower of that played tonight needs to back him anall . F.uck what the media say tomorrow, they've already played apart in getting rid of one manager a ,there not getting rid of another.

NANNY RED wrote:Sa reakly though when you think abuut it, You only haveto look at a couple if sesaons and and even tis seasion were if we got beat by the mancs fireinstance therewoild have been fecking up raor and yet we didnt seem ar,sed when we lost gainst the ,well some fans didnt Why because as Igor said you cant get your fire in your belly because our eyes on more other thing more imrotand things, i said to alad last night i am praying for the day when we can jst talk football , and how good or what he played like, but instead are heads are still batterd with these two and sometimes well all thetime this has to remain pririty. i wanna get bavk to stop being a financil , and leveraged godderick i wasnna just be a football fan again ,and aregue in the pub after the game who sh.it he was or how good he was .

Thats all

bigmick wrote:I know Pacheco has been given star billing and I'm also sure people are right when they say he was poor tonight, but if you get a result like that against lower division opposition it's the experienced players and the management who must take the blame. I'm no Pacheco lover as I've barely seen him play, but he's just a kid.

There were a couple of players out there who have played in excess of 100 times for the first team and they should be absolutely bossing it. One of them (Agger) has been making noises about he likes to play a certain way in the press all week, well why didn't he do it then.

As for the management, feck all this blaming the paucity of the squad you were left/the owners/parry or any of that old b0ll0cks. This was a trophy we had a chance of winning, and to surrender in this fashion was a disgrace from players and managers alike.

Fauxy wrote:

NANNY RED wrote:Sa reakly though when you think abuut it, You only haveto look at a couple if sesaons and and even tis seasion were if we got beat by the mancs fireinstance therewoild have been fecking up raor and yet we didnt seem ar,sed when we lost gainst the ,well some fans didnt Why because as Igor said you cant get your fire in your belly because our eyes on more other thing more imrotand things, i said to alad last night i am praying for the day when we can jst talk football , and how good or what he played like, but instead are heads are still batterd with these two and sometimes well all thetime this has to remain pririty. i wanna get bavk to stop being a financil , and leveraged godderick i wasnna just be a football fan again ,and aregue in the pub after the game who sh.it he was or how good he was .

Thats all

i think someone may have been on the apple squash again     

rocky29 wrote:

bigmick wrote:I know Pacheco has been given star billing and I'm also sure people are right when they say he was poor tonight, but if you get a result like that against lower division opposition it's the experienced players and the management who must take the blame. I'm no Pacheco lover as I've barely seen him play, but he's just a kid.

There were a couple of players out there who have played in excess of 100 times for the first team and they should be absolutely bossing it. One of them (Agger) has been making noises about he likes to play a certain way in the press all week, well why didn't he do it then.

As for the management, feck all this blaming the paucity of the squad you were left/the owners/parry or any of that old b0ll0cks. This was a trophy we had a chance of winning, and to surrender in this fashion was a disgrace from players and managers alike.

so you honestly believe getting rid of aqua and mash hasnt made a massive difference to our squad. you dont rate aqua but you rate poulsen what a joke pal. lets see whos right in the end .

GRAHAM01 wrote:

Fauxy wrote:

NANNY RED wrote:Sa reakly though when you think abuut it, You only haveto look at a couple if sesaons and and even tis seasion were if we got beat by the mancs fireinstance therewoild have been fecking up raor and yet we didnt seem ar,sed when we lost gainst the ,well some fans didnt Why because as Igor said you cant get your fire in your belly because our eyes on more other thing more imrotand things, i said to alad last night i am praying for the day when we can jst talk football , and how good or what he played like, but instead are heads are still batterd with these two and sometimes well all thetime this has to remain pririty. i wanna get bavk to stop being a financil , and leveraged godderick i wasnna just be a football fan again ,and aregue in the pub after the game who sh.it he was or how good he was .

Thats all

i think someone may have been on the apple squash again     

Apple squash and vodka you mean!



Hold the apple squash 

bigmick wrote:

rocky29 wrote:

bigmick wrote:I know Pacheco has been given star billing and I'm also sure people are right when they say he was poor tonight, but if you get a result like that against lower division opposition it's the experienced players and the management who must take the blame. I'm no Pacheco lover as I've barely seen him play, but he's just a kid.

There were a couple of players out there who have played in excess of 100 times for the first team and they should be absolutely bossing it. One of them (Agger) has been making noises about he likes to play a certain way in the press all week, well why didn't he do it then.

As for the management, feck all this blaming the paucity of the squad you were left/the owners/parry or any of that old b0ll0cks. This was a trophy we had a chance of winning, and to surrender in this fashion was a disgrace from players and managers alike.

so you honestly believe getting rid of aqua and mash hasnt made a massive difference to our squad. you dont rate aqua but you rate poulsen what a joke pal. lets see whos right in the end .

You're yet another on here who is more concerned about that than you are the club doing well. what makes it even more ironic, is you have talked utter sh!t about the subject of Aquilani from day one.

I'll let you into a secret mate, he was a country mile away from being good enough. I've been polite so far, because that's what I'm like, but the fact you still go on about him means either you had the hots for him, you are utterly clueless, or both.

whos clueless you think konchesky and poulsen are gona be big hits at the club 

Fauxy wrote:

GRAHAM01 wrote:

Fauxy wrote:

NANNY RED wrote:Sa reakly though when you think abuut it, You only haveto look at a couple if sesaons and and even tis seasion were if we got beat by the mancs fireinstance therewoild have been fecking up raor and yet we didnt seem ar,sed when we lost gainst the ,well some fans didnt Why because as Igor said you cant get your fire in your belly because our eyes on more other thing more imrotand things, i said to alad last night i am praying for the day when we can jst talk football , and how good or what he played like, but instead are heads are still batterd with these two and sometimes well all thetime this has to remain pririty. i wanna get bavk to stop being a financil , and leveraged godderick i wasnna just be a football fan again ,and aregue in the pub after the game who sh.it he was or how good he was .

Thats all

i think someone may have been on the apple squash again     

Apple squash and vodka you mean!



Hold the apple squash