TAKEOVER COMPLETE - H & G Finally Jibbed!

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby roberto green » Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:52 pm

If Broughton pulls this off I reckon he should be given the freedom of  the city
Image
User avatar
roberto green
 
Posts: 3849
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 9:47 pm
Location: bootle

Postby Number 9 » Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:52 pm

The kunts are skwirming in a bowl of shi,te......they are doomed and they know it....it's pathetic,they reckon they can still hold on!

NO YA CAN'T...................GET OUT,SEE YA,GOOD BY, :censored: OFF,DO ONE,TRUNDLE ON....and learn a lesson,You can be rich,you can be a success and come from nowhere in your life,be wealthy men....BUT YA CAN'T :censored: WITH OUR CLUB!!

The bottom line is we care about LFC more than you care about your dollars......FUC'K OFF!!
Image
User avatar
Number 9
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7601
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:19 pm
Location: South Belfast

Postby metalhead » Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:52 pm

Igor Zidane wrote:The league need 10 days notice of any board changes with club (Prem rules for all clubs)
Any board changes need to be approved by the chairman (according to terms of refinanance agree with RBS)
The chairman works for Barcap/RBS  but even if they found a way to go against the chairman, the 10 days notice takes them 1 day past when RBS can take the club off them if the debt isn't paid in full.

:censored: yaaaa :buttrock

suck it Hicks!!
ImageImageImage
User avatar
metalhead
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 17476
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: Milan, Italy

Postby Igor Zidane » Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:54 pm

And just to re-cap why hicks can't sack Purslow and Ayre




The Articles of Association tend to disagree with that

The Company Articles for The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited set out the rules for the removal of directors in clauses 81 and 83.

Clause 83 gives a list of valid reasons for the removal of a director, such as being disqualified by law, mental illness etc, none of which apply is this instance.

Therefore a Director can only be removed in accordance with clause 81, which states "Any appointment or removal shall be made in writing and signed by the then current Chairman"

It would seem then that Hicks and Gillett can't get rid of Purslow and Ayre without Broughtons permission, which given this statement clearly hasn't been given.

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4746910/LFC%20company%20articles.pdf
UP THE PURPS !!!
Image
https://www.colfc.co.uk/
Igor Zidane
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7796
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:23 pm
Location: Liverpool

Postby burjennio » Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:55 pm

Someone hand the undistinguished gentlemen Hicks and Gillette a tub of vaseline and something to bite down on - they be F*CKED :laugh:
User avatar
burjennio
 
Posts: 3333
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:17 pm
Location: belfast

Postby Simari » Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:56 pm

Thanks Igor, hopefully that will put to rest any fears that some might have about the twit and :censored: authority to remove Purslow and Ayre.
Simari
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 1145
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 11:58 am
Location: London

Postby LFC2007 » Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:01 pm

In case anyone hasn't seen it.

Broughton interviewed by the BBC:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/l/liverpool/9066856.stm
User avatar
LFC2007
 
Posts: 7706
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: London

Postby neil » Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:01 pm

broughton appears to be a very shrewd operator, to give an indepth TV interview about the situation and to disqualify any potential scenario regarding the owners attempt to block the sale would suggest we're actually home and hosed.
User avatar
neil
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 3397
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:24 am

Postby Kukilon » Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:02 pm

The only way they may have a small chance is if Hicks brings all the money that RBS wants but he still will have to battle it out in court. They can't sell the club now before it goes into administration.
Kukilon
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 1381
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:56 am

Postby Kharhaz » Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:03 pm

LFC2007 wrote:In case anyone hasn't seen it.

Broughton interviewed by the BBC:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/l/liverpool/9066856.stm

When he mentioned about the current owners not being able to get any money back he looks like he is desperately holding in a giggle !  :D
Bill Shankly: “I was the best manager in Britain because I was never devious or cheated anyone. I’d break my wife’s legs if I played against her, but I’d never cheat her.”
User avatar
Kharhaz
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 6380
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 1:18 am

Postby Igor Zidane » Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:05 pm

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=830461&sec=england&cc=5739


    The trio of controlling members of the Liverpool board have issued legal proceedings against Tom Hicks and George Gillett and are heading to the High Court on Friday to push through the £300 million sale of the club, ESPNsoccernet can reveal.


    GettyImages

    Liverpool's board members are set to meet in the High Court on Friday

    • MLS chief backs NESV to succeed
    • Brewin: Out of the frying pan
    • In profile: John W Henry

    Chairman Martin Broughton, managing director Christian Purslow and commercial director Ian Ayre have pre-empted any legal action by current co-owners Hicks and Gillett to stop the planned takeover, issuing a 'declaratory judgment' which their solicitors, Slaughter and May, have prepared for a hearing on Friday.

    Hicks and Gillett, whose losses would be an estimated £140 million, are convinced that their legal arguments will halt the proposed sale to the owners of the Boston Red Sox, and an appeal appears certain no matter what the outcome of the initial courtroom battle on Friday.

    The trio are anxious that the whole legal process, and indeed the sale that depends upon it, is completed by the October 15 deadline, when the Royal Bank of Scotland calls in its £237 million loans from Hicks and Gillett and effectively owns the club. The bank would then have to sell the club on, or put Liverpool into administration.

    "We need to go to the court to get a declaratory judgement, which is for the court to declare that we did act validly in completing the sale agreement, and then the buyers can complete the sale," Broughton said.

    Broughton has not ruled out administration, and the club would then plead with the Premier League not to deduct the nine-point penalty.

    "This is not a case of financial doping, by overspending on players, wages or transfers," a source said. "It is not the case that the club is insolvent and still trading. It is the borrowings by the two Americans when they bought the club.

    "But clearly Liverpool does not wish to risk having nine points deducted, so it's imperative that the sale goes through before October 15, but it is signed conditional on the legal issues being resolved."

    The Premier League is planning to rubber stamp the sale on Friday, according to Liverpool sources.
UP THE PURPS !!!
Image
https://www.colfc.co.uk/
Igor Zidane
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7796
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:23 pm
Location: Liverpool

Postby Benny The Noon » Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:06 pm

The really good news about the prospective new owner - his wife is a bit alright
Image
Benny The Noon
 

Postby redbilly » Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:06 pm

Been in work all day so missed most of what has been happening, but just watched the interview on bbc Robert Peston and Martin Broughton 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/l/liverpool/9066856.stm
and feel very positive that this is going to be a big day in our history.
Just wish those 2 tw@ts would just feck off.
Last edited by redbilly on Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
redbilly
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 3:29 pm
Location: Liverpool

Postby NANNY RED » Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:06 pm

Ill tell you what im cautious of course i am what with weve had to put up with , Ill welcome them but it wont be with open arms , they have to do what is right ,ill watch , wait and see , I have just read this piece and i hope this fella  is as sincere with us as he is with his Red Sox, ill be honest here it actualy choked me reading it . The words reminded of what a great man said many years ago WE PLAY FOR YOU .

http://boston.redsox.mlb.com/news...._id=bos
HE WHO BETRAYS WILL ALWAYS WALK ALONE
User avatar
NANNY RED
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13334
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 12:45 pm

Postby NANNY RED » Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:13 pm

Benny The Noon wrote:The really good news about the prospective new owner - his wife is a bit alright
Image

I dont like her top  :laugh:
HE WHO BETRAYS WILL ALWAYS WALK ALONE
User avatar
NANNY RED
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13334
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 12:45 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 86 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e