Kharhaz wrote:Disgraceful some of you are, trying to constantly belittle Houllier's achievements for this club.
Thats not the case at all, your trying to prove that Houllier is on a comparison with Rafa. He isnt. For many reasons, be it transfers, tactics whatever. The fact is Houllier, had the security and financial muscle to build a team, rafa hasnt. He has had to make do with wheeling and dealing, bringing in the free transfers, signing top players while accepting a wage drop. Your arguments are failing. Rafa has been at a major disadvantage compared to houllier and you seem intent on proving otherwise.
Benitez hasn't had money...not this a gain.
Benitez signings...our most expensive keeper. our most expensive defender. our two most expensive midfielders and our most expensive forward. How much more money does he need. He's spent more than 10 million on five players (Torres, Alonso, Kuyt, Babel and Mascheranho) Houllier spent 10 million plus on three (Diouf, Cisse and Heskey)
But just to prove the point even further, how do you explain the success of Agger who cost 5 million and Arbeloa even less then? Don't they prove that money isn't everything. Everyone (bar me) seems to rave about Aurellio he came on a free surely another example to why money isn't everything. Reina cost less than Cech yet is better. Agger cost less than Carvalho or Ferdinand yet is better. Alonso cost less than Essien, Carrick or Hargreaves yet it better. Torres cost less than Rooney, Shevchenko or Drogba yet last time I checked Torres was outscoring the three of them. So please explain to me why people say Benitez needs money.
Despite him bringing in our most expsensive player in every postition people still assume he needs more. Despite him being able to find bargins people still think it's neccassary to throw another 500 million to him. I really don't see how people can still think he hasn't had enough money.