bigmick wrote:I wouldn't touch Diouf if he offered to play for free. Bad news in capital letters, flashing light, neon sign.
Leonmc0708 wrote:bigmick wrote:I wouldn't touch Diouf if he offered to play for free. Bad news in capital letters, flashing light, neon sign.
But you would rather we outlay £2.5M on Robert Earnshaw?
vlady16.1 wrote:"patience is required until the fate of cisse is known -- the prudent path would be to play baros a a single striker with kewell or garcia playing behind him-- either would flurish in that capacity and baros may be better as the sole striker anyway"
John Barnes' Granny wrote:Leonmc0708 wrote:bigmick wrote:I wouldn't touch Diouf if he offered to play for free. Bad news in capital letters, flashing light, neon sign.
But you would rather we outlay £2.5M on Robert Earnshaw?
The same Robert Earnchaw that scored a few goals for Cardiff and a couple for Wales yet (so far) looks completely out of his depth at West Brom?
ivor_the_injun wrote:What? Have you not being following what happened at the weekend? He's out for the season.
This needs addressing NOW. January is two months away. Baros has been injured at least once per season since he joined us, and relying on him to be there for every game is not wise.
Where would injury to Baros leave us? Mellor as lone striker? How about Pongolle? Does anybody really want to rely on Kewell?
Honestly, all this laughter is all well and good, but I have to say that this is a massive concern.
Seeing as though he's already on our books - Diouf would be a prudent solution to see us through to January. The point's been made that players who underachieved under Houllier have flourished under Benitez. Who's to say that Diouf or Le Tallec couldn't do the same?
Oh, and those who have moaned about some of Diouf's comments in the past - I take it we'll just overlook Baros' comments seeing as though he's playing well, yeah?
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 176 guests