NeGrAmArOfOrEvEr wrote:but when you can know something about its future:D
You need a crystal ball to know whats going on at the moment!
Lakes10 has got 2 crystal balls but the view is 'cloudy'.
Reg wrote:Redman in wales wrote:Question:
why does everyone think our next manager has to have a proven track record or won leagues before?
None of Liverpools title winning managers had won a league trophy before managing at Anfield.
Our current manager who has won league titles before hasn't managed to win the league during his 6 years here.
Big European clubs like Real Madrid, Barcelona employ managers who haven't won a league titles before (Guadiola, Schuster) and they won league titles.
Yes, experience is good, but so is a young manager with knowledge and passion.
For me its best man to take Liverpool forward. I dont care if they've not managed a top 4 club before, or not won a league title. Someone who knows their snizzle, good in the transfer market and has pride and passion, and can get the most of of their players. Thats what I want.
Equally damaging is when these high profile managers leave they take the entire backroom staff with them leaving the club completely vunerable.
I would be up for a British manager with a British bootroom that work for the club not the manager. I´m not for Hodgson but he might be tempted and I might be convinced also if he was offered a 2 or 3 year fixed term contract to provide instant stability whilst we rebuild the bootroom. He´d probably retiure after 2-3 years anyway thus wouldnt want to take a backroom staff anywhere. It would allow us to develop staff and groom someone for the managers role. After that all bootroom staff contracts are with the club, not linked to the manager and somehow containing penalties if they left to follow a manager.
That way someone like Carra could get on the bottom rung of the ladder and work his way up, or we could poach the Port Vale coach, or Middlesborough etc.. and they´d know they´re in a protected system with job security regardless of the coming and going of a particular manager. It would also serve to break this silly and very expensive system of management teams that are holding clubs to ransom at present and maybe more importantly stop managers like Houllier and Benitez bringing hundreds of French and Spanish players to clubs who never work out.
Lets rebuild from a home base.
bunglemark2 wrote:What's all this fuss about demanding a meeting with the board, eh ? He has 4 years of a 5 year contract to run, so it's not as if he's demanding reassurances about his future, is it ? He has a cast-iron guarantee that he WILL be there at the start of next season, unless the club decides to get rid, in which case he will receive a great big phuck-off pay out, thank you very much...
I believe what he is doing is showmanship - echoing the players demands in the press, and now showing a sign of solidarity (at least, to the outside world) that the players and coaching staff demand answers. If he didn't vocalise what the players are also saying, that would definitely be the end of him, 'cos even if he were here at the start of next season, by NOT agreeing with the players, it would mean they wouldn't play for him...
I think he's a cagy little fecker, this man....
Reg wrote:NeGrAmArOfOrEvEr wrote:but when you can know something about its future:D
You need a crystal ball to know whats going on at the moment!
Lakes10 has got 2 crystal balls but the view is 'cloudy'.
tonyeh wrote:bunglemark2 wrote:What's all this fuss about demanding a meeting with the board, eh ? He has 4 years of a 5 year contract to run, so it's not as if he's demanding reassurances about his future, is it ? He has a cast-iron guarantee that he WILL be there at the start of next season, unless the club decides to get rid, in which case he will receive a great big phuck-off pay out, thank you very much...
I believe what he is doing is showmanship - echoing the players demands in the press, and now showing a sign of solidarity (at least, to the outside world) that the players and coaching staff demand answers. If he didn't vocalise what the players are also saying, that would definitely be the end of him, 'cos even if he were here at the start of next season, by NOT agreeing with the players, it would mean they wouldn't play for him...
I think he's a cagy little fecker, this man....
Mmmm...I certainly don't rate Benitez as the "genius" on the pitch that some do. But, he's definitely a genius when it comes to negotiating the terms and conditions of his employment.
How anyone could manover his/her employers into signing an ok to pay out 16 mill for a sacking is beyond me.
That really was tactical genius.
shabelle50 wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/l/liverpool/8660055.stm
So Benitez was to meet Broughton last week and the week before but cancelled both meetings. I thought Benitez gave the impression at the weekend the lack of meetings was not down to him.
He's clearly weighing up his options and is making the best of the situation to his own advantage particularly if Juve don't want to pay compensation to secure his services. I'd be staggered if Sammy Lee doesn't pick the team on sunday at Hull. I can see a press conference being called by Friday in Italy if not in Liverpool.
SouthCoastShankly wrote:tonyeh wrote:bunglemark2 wrote:What's all this fuss about demanding a meeting with the board, eh ? He has 4 years of a 5 year contract to run, so it's not as if he's demanding reassurances about his future, is it ? He has a cast-iron guarantee that he WILL be there at the start of next season, unless the club decides to get rid, in which case he will receive a great big phuck-off pay out, thank you very much...
I believe what he is doing is showmanship - echoing the players demands in the press, and now showing a sign of solidarity (at least, to the outside world) that the players and coaching staff demand answers. If he didn't vocalise what the players are also saying, that would definitely be the end of him, 'cos even if he were here at the start of next season, by NOT agreeing with the players, it would mean they wouldn't play for him...
I think he's a cagy little fecker, this man....
Mmmm...I certainly don't rate Benitez as the "genius" on the pitch that some do. But, he's definitely a genius when it comes to negotiating the terms and conditions of his employment.
How anyone could manover his/her employers into signing an ok to pay out 16 mill for a sacking is beyond me.
That really was tactical genius.
Yeah but the £16m is a fixed sum. It is a refection of the value of his remaining contract. The value would decrease for every year of his contract that expired.
I think he is on £5m per year.
Emerald Red wrote:Reg wrote:NeGrAmArOfOrEvEr wrote:but when you can know something about its future:D
You need a crystal ball to know whats going on at the moment!
Lakes10 has got 2 crystal balls but the view is 'cloudy'.
Lakes doesn't read crystal balls. Like the tea leaf method, Lakes likes to read the bottom of his toilet bowl for the patterns after pebble dashing it with his own sh*t.
SouthCoastShankly wrote:tonyeh wrote:bunglemark2 wrote:What's all this fuss about demanding a meeting with the board, eh ? He has 4 years of a 5 year contract to run, so it's not as if he's demanding reassurances about his future, is it ? He has a cast-iron guarantee that he WILL be there at the start of next season, unless the club decides to get rid, in which case he will receive a great big phuck-off pay out, thank you very much...
I believe what he is doing is showmanship - echoing the players demands in the press, and now showing a sign of solidarity (at least, to the outside world) that the players and coaching staff demand answers. If he didn't vocalise what the players are also saying, that would definitely be the end of him, 'cos even if he were here at the start of next season, by NOT agreeing with the players, it would mean they wouldn't play for him...
I think he's a cagy little fecker, this man....
Mmmm...I certainly don't rate Benitez as the "genius" on the pitch that some do. But, he's definitely a genius when it comes to negotiating the terms and conditions of his employment.
How anyone could manover his/her employers into signing an ok to pay out 16 mill for a sacking is beyond me.
That really was tactical genius.
Yeah but the £16m isn't a fixed sum. It is a refection of the value of his remaining contract. The value would decrease for every year of his contract that expired.
I think he is on £5m per year.
Emerald Red wrote:Reg wrote:NeGrAmArOfOrEvEr wrote:but when you can know something about its future:D
You need a crystal ball to know whats going on at the moment!
Lakes10 has got 2 crystal balls but the view is 'cloudy'.
Lakes doesn't read crystal balls. Like the tea leaf method, Lakes likes to read the bottom of his toilet bowl for the patterns after pebble dashing it with his own sh*t.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 75 guests