bavlondon wrote:Cool Hand Luke wrote:Rather than pay 17Mil for Johnson we could have had a look in the Championship and found ourselves someone not far off Johnson’s quality for a fraction of the price. £17Mil really is daylight robbery, and just like Keane, Johnson will be found wanting at this level.
More money down the drain.
Find someone in the Championship who is close to Englands 1st choice RB? If only it were that easy mate.
we all dream... wrote:you read my mind bav, if readings right back was as good as johnson then he wudnt be readings right back.
Cool Hand Luke wrote:Rather than pay 17Mil for Johnson we could have had a look in the Championship and found ourselves someone not far off Johnson’s quality for a fraction of the price. £17Mil really is daylight robbery, and just like Keane, Johnson will be found wanting at this level.
More money down the drain.
Cool Hand Luke wrote:we all dream... wrote:you read my mind bav, if readings right back was as good as johnson then he wudnt be readings right back.
The same thing could have been said about Upson. “If Birmingham’s centre back was as good as the England centre backs he wouldn’t be Birmingham’s centre back”.
Now look at him, only behind Terry and Ferdinand. And how about Ashley Young when he was at Watford? Dean Ashton when he was at Crewe?
Your theory is b0llocks.
Cool Hand Luke wrote:Put it this way, if we wanted a fast and strong right back who bombs forward to support the attack but is not very good at defending, we could have got Emmanuel Eboue for free rather than spend £17 Mil on Johnson. Is there really that much difference between them?
I’m not a fan of either but it really does put in to perspective.
john craig wrote:Cool Hand Luke wrote:Put it this way, if we wanted a fast and strong right back who bombs forward to support the attack but is not very good at defending, we could have got Emmanuel Eboue for free rather than spend £17 Mil on Johnson. Is there really that much difference between them?
I’m not a fan of either but it really does put in to perspective.
This I completely agree with.
Eboue was a good attacking full back before Wenger bought Sagna and then destroyed the lad's confidence by playing him right mid where he was clearly uncomfortable.
Eboue for free and Johnson for 17 mil and you're absolutely right, there's not a great deal of difference between them.
Ace Ventura wrote:john craig wrote:Cool Hand Luke wrote:Put it this way, if we wanted a fast and strong right back who bombs forward to support the attack but is not very good at defending, we could have got Emmanuel Eboue for free rather than spend £17 Mil on Johnson. Is there really that much difference between them?
I’m not a fan of either but it really does put in to perspective.
This I completely agree with.
Eboue was a good attacking full back before Wenger bought Sagna and then destroyed the lad's confidence by playing him right mid where he was clearly uncomfortable.
Eboue for free and Johnson for 17 mil and you're absolutely right, there's not a great deal of difference between them.
F...................UCK OFF
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 88 guests