Liverpool FC Forum

by **nobybob** » Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:49 pm

Ciggy wrote:
The Manhattan Project wrote:Mr Nob

You want to create a "Get G/H Out Thread?"

So where is it?

It's not that hard to click "TOPIC" is it?

Thanx for tellin him Foster

oops believe it or not i never noticed that button before duhhhh thanx guys
:blush:

thiought only admin could start anew topic

by **nobybob** » Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:52 pm

J*o*n*D*o*e wrote:
nobybob wrote:
J*o*n*D*o*e wrote:nobybob your obsessed with DIC

so is ur sister lol

if i had one im sure she would be.

what u dont have a DIC ?? :laugh:

by **The Manhattan Project** » Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:55 pm

nobybob wrote:Really? Who's laughing?

Man Utd with their 500 squillion pounds of debt? (and their premersip titles)

Chelsea with their bubble? ( with theirs)

Newcastle with.....well....they have too many problems to mention. ( at least there owners have money to spend cos ours dont)

Man Utd - And why exactly do they have a Premiership title? Because their manager knows how to instill a winning mentality in the team and they play superb football. It's not all about splashing the cash.

Newcastle - Yes, money to spend on Barton, Viduka, Smith and other world-class players.

by **tubby** » Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:59 pm

The Manhattan Project wrote:
nobybob wrote:Really? Who's laughing?

Man Utd with their 500 squillion pounds of debt? (and their premersip titles)

Chelsea with their bubble? ( with theirs)

Newcastle with.....well....they have too many problems to mention. ( at least there owners have money to spend cos ours dont)

Man Utd - And why exactly do they have a Premiership title? Because their manager knows how to instill a winning mentality in the team and they play superb football. It's not all about splashing the cash.

Newcastle - Yes, money to spend on Barton, Viduka, Smith and other world-class players.

It is a bit about splashing sometimes.

Ronaldo looked expensive at 12mil but look at him now. Rooney, Tevez, Anderson. They are all expenisive but they are top class players. We have a few too but we need more.

by **nobybob** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:01 am

The Manhattan Project wrote:
nobybob wrote:Really? Who's laughing?

Man Utd with their 500 squillion pounds of debt? (and their premersip titles)

Chelsea with their bubble? ( with theirs)

Newcastle with.....well....they have too many problems to mention. ( at least there owners have money to spend cos ours dont)

Man Utd - And why exactly do they have a Premiership title? Because their manager knows how to instill a winning mentality in the team and they play superb football. It's not all about splashing the cash.

Newcastle - Yes, money to spend on Barton, Viduka, Smith and other world-class players.

and how long did fergie take to build his (superb footballing team ))???
years -- yet your all for RAFA going now LMAO

NEWCASLTLE
oh yes but u forgot one player there a little fella called OWEN that they OUTBID us for

by **Ciggy** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:02 am

The Manhattan Project wrote:Man Utd - And why exactly do they have a Premiership title? Because their manager knows how to instill a winning mentality in the team and they play superb football. It's not all about splashing the cash.

Rooney 30 million, Ronaldo 17 million in todays money 30 million, Tevez 20 million, Carrick 18 million, Ferdinand 30 million Nanny & Anderson 20 million, Hargrieves 16 million.

No your right its not about splashing the cash :laugh:

by **nobybob** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:08 am

Ciggy wrote:
The Manhattan Project wrote:Man Utd - And why exactly do they have a Premiership title? Because their manager knows how to instill a winning mentality in the team and they play superb football. It's not all about splashing the cash.

Rooney 30 million, Ronaldo 17 million in todays money 30 million, Tevez 20 million, Carrick 18 million, Ferdinand 30 million Nanny & Anderson 20 million, Hargrieves 16 million.

No your right its not about splashing the cash

Manhatton talks of manure being 500 MILLION in debt then 2 minutes later says they havent splashed the cash hahahaha

by **The Manhattan Project** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:09 am

It is a bit about splashing sometimes.

Ronaldo looked expensive at 12mil but look at him now. Rooney, Tevez, Anderson. They are all expenisive but they are top class players. We have a few too but we need more.

12M is nothing. It's about how we have spent money and what we do with players after we have them. Ronaldo was a poser originally, but gelled with the team, and I'm sure Fergie had a role in that.

and how long did fergie take to build his (superb footballing team ))???
years -- yet your all for RAFA going now LMAO

How long did it take Arsene Wenger to put together the present Arsenal team and they are light years ahead of us in the Prem.

NEWCASLTLE
oh yes but u forgot one player there a little fella called OWEN that they OUTBID us for

We dodged a bullet there. You should be thanking Newcastle.

Rooney 30 million, Ronaldo 17 million in todays money 30 million, Tevez 20 million, Carrick 18 million, Ferdinand 30 million Nanny & Anderson 20 million, Hargrieves 16 million.

No your right its not about splashing the cash

I AM right. It's not about splashing cash.

We spent 14M on Cisse, the player you named yourself after, and he was shyt.

It's one thing to buy an expensive player, but another to use the properly and shape them into a successful team. Fergie has been building Premiership winning teams since the days Souness was fooking everything up at LFC

by **Bad Bob** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:09 am

nobybob wrote:thiought only admin could start anew topic

If only!

by **The Manhattan Project** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:10 am

Manhatton talks of manure being 500 MILLION in debt then 2 minutes later says they havent splashed the cash hahahaha

Erm...they didn't build that debt by buying players.

That was placed upon them when they were bought by the Glazers.

by **NANNY RED** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:11 am

Ciggy wrote:
J*o*n*D*o*e wrote:
Ciggy wrote:Anyone see Rafa in his slippers at the pre match press conference

no doubt somebody will see it as another sign.

He was speaking a bit of arabic and had a cheque tea towel over his head

Hell be getting a harem next cigg

by **nobybob** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:14 am

The Manhattan Project wrote:
Manhatton talks of manure being 500 MILLION in debt then 2 minutes later says they havent splashed the cash hahahaha

Erm...they didn't build that debt by buying players.

That was placed upon them when they were bought by the Glazers.

oh so its nothing to do with the

Rooney 30 million, Ronaldo 17 million in todays money 30 million, Tevez 20 million, Carrick 18 million, Ferdinand 30 million Nanny & Anderson 20 million, Hargrieves 16 million.

by **NANNY RED** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:20 am

Where not the only ones who hate him this Texas Rangers supporter has nailed it in one. I copied this from there site there disscusing the :censored:

aswell

dont mean to ring the same bell, but *ding* *ding* *ding*..Hicks lack of interest in the Rangers is apalling. The fans who follow the Rangers, and who are constantley let down have every right to chirp at the ownership. I'm sure Tom Hicks would agree on some degree. Lucky for Hicks, the Rangers have loyal fans who will never leave the Rangers, and I believe Hicks exploits us by not showing the interest and dedication to winning that we deserve.. Every great owner in any sport competes for the fan(s). Hicks doesn't look to compete for our pride as Ranger fans. He has shown he is much more interested in the net worth of the organization. Example, it's like a real estate investment. You know how you buy a house, decorate it, rent it out, wait til it increases in value, then sell it for profit? That is basically what Hicks is doing to the Rangers. :angry:

by **The Manhattan Project** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:20 am

oh so its nothing to do with the

Rooney 30 million, Ronaldo 17 million in todays money 30 million, Tevez 20 million, Carrick 18 million, Ferdinand 30 million Nanny & Anderson 20 million, Hargrieves 16 million.

Yes, because they had never won a title before they signed those guys right?

How much did they buy Eric Cantona for?

How much did they buy Ryan Giggs for?

How much did they buy Peter Schmeichel for?

I'll tell ya, collectively about 2M

by **nobybob** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:24 am

The Manhattan Project wrote:
It is a bit about splashing sometimes.

Ronaldo looked expensive at 12mil but look at him now. Rooney, Tevez, Anderson. They are all expenisive but they are top class players. We have a few too but we need more.

12M is nothing. It's about how we have spent money and what we do with players after we have them. Ronaldo was a poser originally, but gelled with the team, and I'm sure Fergie had a role in that.

and how long did fergie take to build his (superb footballing team ))???
years -- yet your all for RAFA going now LMAO

How long did it take Arsene Wenger to put together the present Arsenal team and they are light years ahead of us in the Prem.

NEWCASLTLE
oh yes but u forgot one player there a little fella called OWEN that they OUTBID us for

We dodged a bullet there. You should be thanking Newcastle.

Rooney 30 million, Ronaldo 17 million in todays money 30 million, Tevez 20 million, Carrick 18 million, Ferdinand 30 million Nanny & Anderson 20 million, Hargrieves 16 million.

No your right its not about splashing the cash

I AM right. It's not about splashing cash.

We spent 14M on Cisse, the player you named yourself after, and he was shyt.

It's one thing to buy an expensive player, but another to use the properly and shape them into a successful team. Fergie has been building Premiership winning teams since the days Souness was fooking everything up at LFC

You speak of ronaldo but avoid mention of the total cost of the present manure team which negated your original statement of "its not about splashing the cash"

you talk of wengers PRESENT team but avoid how long it took to build his past teams ! DID wenger achieve instant success at the gooners??

as for OWEN he was a class player that seems to have been crocked> that doesn't alter the point that fu.kin NEWCASTLE were given enough cash to outbid us for a player we wanted does it ??

Liverpool FC Forum

TAKEOVER COMPLETE - H & G Finally Jibbed!

Who is online