Liverpool FC Forum

by **Anfield rapper** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:16 pm

$1.6B would be about £1.0B i would guess. Where he gets that figure from is anyones guess. This man is having a breakdown. Presumably he thinks he can get some authority in the US to stop a US company (NESV) from buying LFC. I believe Hicks is really annoyed that another baseball team owner is getting one over on him and he is trying to through a spanner in there workings but to be honest its a bit baffling.

by **RED BEERGOGGLES** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:18 pm

bavlondon wrote:Hicks lawsuit seeks $1.6 billion in damages against directors of (RBS), Martin Broughton, Christian Purslow, Ian Ayre, NESV and Philip Nash

Im jibbing work Tomorrow especially now that tw@ t has started telling jokes ... 1.6 Billion ....get to fuck you clown :laugh:

by **tubby** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:20 pm

I know it's got nothing to do with us but had to share this.

I hope they get those Chilean miners out in time for work tomorrow.

by **NANNY RED** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:21 pm

RED BEERGOGGLES wrote:
bavlondon wrote:Hicks lawsuit seeks $1.6 billion in damages against directors of (RBS), Martin Broughton, Christian Purslow, Ian Ayre, NESV and Philip Nash

Im jibbing work Tomorrow especially now that tw@ t has started telling jokes ... 1.6 Billion ....get to fuck you clown

IN BULK

NEWS FLASH

PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS DECLARED WAR ON LIVERPOOL

:laugh:

by **Masch79** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:23 pm

NANNY RED wrote:
RED BEERGOGGLES wrote:
bavlondon wrote:Hicks lawsuit seeks $1.6 billion in damages against directors of (RBS), Martin Broughton, Christian Purslow, Ian Ayre, NESV and Philip Nash

Im jibbing work Tomorrow especially now that tw@ t has started telling jokes ... 1.6 Billion ....get to fuck you clown

IN BULK

NEWS FLASH

PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS DECLARED WAR ON LIVERPOOL

He's gotta dossier on Scal Queda :laugh:

by **JBG** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:24 pm

Texas thing is nonsense. Its appears to be directed against NESV. Last desperate throw of the dice by a beaten man.

Henry is in London, the horse has bolted Tom.

by **Reg** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:24 pm

bavlondon wrote:I know it's got nothing to do with us but had to share this.

I hope they get those Chilean miners out in time for work tomorrow.

Brilliant !! :laugh:

by **lakes10** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:25 pm

er, the high court in the UK has more power than the cowboy court, the rule has been set down, LFC stands in the uk and comes under uk banking law as its money his held in uk accounts.

by **Ciggy** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:25 pm

Theyve sent a big long letter to SSN the owners tried to get the money for a re-finance, its a conspiracy, the board done this on purpose that the owners couldnt get any profit from the sale.
Hicks had a bid for 400 million pound FSV on the 5th of October. the letters to long for SSN to read twit & Tw@t are very angry.

This is amazing sh!t Judge Floyd is going to be p!ssed off with them tonight.

by **RED BEERGOGGLES** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:25 pm

NANNY RED wrote:
RED BEERGOGGLES wrote:
bavlondon wrote:Hicks lawsuit seeks $1.6 billion in damages against directors of (RBS), Martin Broughton, Christian Purslow, Ian Ayre, NESV and Philip Nash

Im jibbing work Tomorrow especially now that tw@ t has started telling jokes ... 1.6 Billion ....get to fuck you clown

IN BULK

NEWS FLASH

PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS DECLARED WAR ON LIVERPOOL

... New terrorist cell discovered in Liverpool believed to be Scalqaeda ....

by **Simari** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:25 pm

These guys are beyond mad, they are demented beyond reason. Surely someone must send them to an asylum?

Do they not realise they are simply not wanted and have nothing but total and utter anger and hatred to gain from doing this?

Absolutely un- :censored:

-believable...

by **SouthCoastShankly** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:26 pm

Suggestion that the impact of the Texas suit would be to put RBS/NESV/Broughton et al in contempt of a US Court if sale goes through #lfc
web • 13/10/2010 22:21

by **shabelle50** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:27 pm

I can't see how a Texan court can ride over an english court but if there was another bid some time ago to the tune of £400 billion one has to ask the question did Broughton consider it?

by **worcester_red** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:28 pm

What I don't get is why an English court threw their "evidence" out whilst an American court has granted an injunction....... :glare:

by **Simari** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:29 pm

shabelle50 wrote:I can't see how a Texan court can ride over an english court but if there was another bid some time ago to the tune of £400 billion one has to ask the question did Broughton consider it?

If it was presented to the board, ofcourse he would have considered it. There would be official minutes recorded against this.

It's not like MB can hide any of this ... provided it was indeed presented to the board and not to Hicks riding on his pony on some lawn in yeeeehaaaaa country ...

Liverpool FC Forum

TAKEOVER COMPLETE - H & G Finally Jibbed!

Who is online