Liverpool FC Forum

by **tubby** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:06 pm

Why would a judge grant that restraining order after he was refused leave of appeal? What's he paid of some hick judge.

by **Dundalk** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:07 pm

Dan Roan

The question now is what jurisdiction this temporary restraining order from a Dallas Court has over the Board.

by **Ciggy** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:08 pm

SouthCoastShankly wrote:Hold on people maybe a glitch-

Tariq Panga - Bloomberg learns Hicks has filed a lawsuit against the #LFC board in Dallas. Seeking restraining order and block to sale to NESV.

OMG they have on SSN restraining order, how is this possible? How can a Texas court block it? When our judge stopped them from doing so.

help please Reg do they have a right?

by **NorfolkRed** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:08 pm

so some hick judge in the states thinks he can over rule the high court of a different country? the arrogance is unbelievable

by **roberto green** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:09 pm

Ciggy wrote:
bavlondon wrote:Hicks lawsuit seeks $1.6 billion in damages against directors of (RBS), Martin Broughton, Christian Purslow, Ian Ayre, NESV and Philip Nash

WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 1.6 BILLION $$$

Right lets fight fire with fire, this kunts getting sued for the millions he has siphoned from the club !!!!

Wheres our new stadium yer big arl stinky @rsed b@stard.

WTF.....AS IF 1.6 BILLION, Has this man no dignity, how the hell can a Texas lawsuit stop this when his buisness was in Britain. I hope his stress levels are sky high as well as blood pressure and he drops dead of a heart attack!!

by **jono** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:09 pm

jesus christ

by **LFC2007** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:09 pm

bavlondon wrote:Hicks lawsuit seeks $1.6 billion in damages...

by **Dundalk** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:10 pm

LFC2007 wrote:
bavlondon wrote:Hicks lawsuit seeks $1.6 billion in damages...

In fairness all you can do is laugh at that

1.6 billion :laugh:

by **Reinas No.1 Fan** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:10 pm

roberto green wrote:
Ciggy wrote:
bavlondon wrote:Hicks lawsuit seeks $1.6 billion in damages against directors of (RBS), Martin Broughton, Christian Purslow, Ian Ayre, NESV and Philip Nash

WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 1.6 BILLION $$$

Right lets fight fire with fire, this kunts getting sued for the millions he has siphoned from the club !!!!

Wheres our new stadium yer big arl stinky @rsed b@stard.

WTF.....AS IF 1.6 BILLION, Has this man no dignity, how the hell can a Texas lawsuit stop this when his buisness was in Britain. I hope his stress levels are sky high as well as blood pressure and he drops dead of a heart attack!!

I doubt they will have or be granted jurisdiction. Litterally last throw of the dice, all delaying tactics

by **The Good Yank** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:11 pm

I can't believe that is finally almost over !!!!

by **worcester_red** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:11 pm

I guess the holding companies might come under Texas juristiction but the loan is against KOP holdings which is an English company governed by English law, so this makes no bloody sense to me now.
Hicks is really becoming a pain in the :censored:

now, why doesn't he just fecking give up, he's lost anyway, it's just a matter of time.

Anyway if we are shifting this over to US law then we should all, as fans, sue Hicks for emotional distress, I mean if some fat American bint could sue McDonalds because coffee is hot without having a warning label then we should win easily.

by **SouthCoastShankly** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:12 pm

Agreed it seems weird that a US court could affect a British sale and judgement. I imagine it is aimed at NESV, preventing them as a US venture to complete the purchase.

by **tubby** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:13 pm

I'm not fkn laughing here. Now we can't announce the takeover tonight. God knows what's gonna happen now. Is that even recognised here? Just carry on with the takeover and tell him to :censored:

off.

by **Reg** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:13 pm

LFC2007 wrote:
bavlondon wrote:Hicks lawsuit seeks $1.6 billion in damages...

D'you think he'd settle for Lucas in px?? :laugh:

by **worcester_red** » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:14 pm

SouthCoastShankly wrote:Agreed it seems weird that a US court could affect a British sale and judgement. I imagine it is aimed at NESV, preventing them as a US venture to complete the purchase.

Unlikely, unless NESV for some weird reason is based in Dallas, I doubt this is a federal ruling, actually I doubt it is much of anything at all.

Liverpool FC Forum

TAKEOVER COMPLETE - H & G Finally Jibbed!

Who is online