TAKEOVER COMPLETE - H & G Finally Jibbed!

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby LFC ANIME » Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:02 am

Hang on a minute... Didn't Martin Broughton said in July on LIVE TV that the Yank$ can't have any say on a takeover bid? So he was bull shitting as all the news insist they are trying to block it? ????
Image
User avatar
LFC ANIME
 
Posts: 109
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 2:49 am

Postby tubby » Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:05 am

Dalglish wrote:
Ciggy wrote:Everyone got radio 5 live on?

Just caught the tail end of it Lyns..........

Rogan was on and from his perspective it looks increasingly likely that it will end in litigation  ???

I wouldn't personally want to call it at present but it does smack of the endgame to me. It simply can't go on like this.......

The Mancs are revelling in it but their time (and Chelsea's i suspect) will come soon and it will make our troubles seem like a playground sapt. Lets not forget the Mancs are closing in on a billion in debt !

The Beautiful games turned ugly mate..........

In the meantime what happens to us whilst we struggle near the foot of the table? We need funds pumped into the team and a new stadium.  :(

Can RBS just throw it all out the window and call in the load? A court battle over a football club? This has to be a first.
My new blog for my upcoming holiday.

http://kunstevie.wordpress.com/
User avatar
tubby
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 22442
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:05 pm

Postby Dundalk » Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:05 am

The Americans paid £174.1m to buy the club in 2007, while also agreeing to take on the club's debt of £44.8m.


That gets worse everytime you read it :(
User avatar
Dundalk
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 14767
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 9:46 am
Location: Dundalk

Postby Simari » Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:05 am

LFC ANIME wrote:Hang on a minute... Didn't Martin Broughton said in July on LIVE TV that the Yank$ can't have any say on a takeover bid? So he was bull shitting as all the news insist they are trying to block it? ????

They can't block it, but they can try to remove the majority, Hence the mention of 'legal review' in the LFC statement. The next bit of news we receive will most definitely be around the outcome of this stunt by the yanks.
Simari
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 1145
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 11:58 am
Location: London

Postby tubby » Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:09 am

off twitter


RBuxton_LFC
 
Hicks & Gillett snookered themselves by appointing Broughton as they cannot remove Purslow or Ayre without permission of chairman
My new blog for my upcoming holiday.

http://kunstevie.wordpress.com/
User avatar
tubby
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 22442
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:05 pm

Postby Fauxy » Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:10 am

Statement about to come in from Hicks apparently imminent.
Image
User avatar
Fauxy
 
Posts: 2273
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:22 pm

Postby Ciggy » Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:11 am

bavlondon wrote:off twitter


RBuxton_LFC
 
Hicks & Gillett snookered themselves by appointing Broughton as they cannot remove Purslow or Ayre without permission of chairman

This is true read Igors post from earlier, thats in Ayers and Purslows contract.

We are fecked if Hicks brings in Jimmy feckin Mack and that Lori slag, but then again they would have to work in Liverpool so it might not be a bad thing afterall ;)
Last edited by Ciggy on Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
There is no-one anywhere in the world at any stage who is any bigger or any better than this football club.

Kenny Dalglish 1/2/2011

REST IN PEACE PHIL, YOU WILL NEVER BE FORGOTTEN.
User avatar
Ciggy
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 26826
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 2:36 pm

Postby metalhead » Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:12 am

Fauxy wrote:Statement about to come in from Hicks apparently imminent.

where did you hear that?
ImageImageImage
User avatar
metalhead
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 17476
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: Milan, Italy

Postby roysreds » Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:13 am

metalhead wrote:
Fauxy wrote:Statement about to come in from Hicks apparently imminent.

where did you hear that?

..

its all over twitter.

.
User avatar
roysreds
 
Posts: 201
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:09 pm
Location: Liverpool

Postby Ciggy » Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:14 am

Fauxy wrote:Statement about to come in from Hicks apparently imminent.

Where on mate? SSN or the radio?
There is no-one anywhere in the world at any stage who is any bigger or any better than this football club.

Kenny Dalglish 1/2/2011

REST IN PEACE PHIL, YOU WILL NEVER BE FORGOTTEN.
User avatar
Ciggy
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 26826
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 2:36 pm

Postby Simari » Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:15 am

Hicks statement on SSN now.

He can right :censored: off !!!
Simari
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 1145
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 11:58 am
Location: London

Postby Dundalk » Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:15 am

Statement from Hicks coming soon
User avatar
Dundalk
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 14767
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 9:46 am
Location: Dundalk

Postby metalhead » Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:16 am

what does hicks want now!
ImageImageImage
User avatar
metalhead
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 17476
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: Milan, Italy

Postby NANNY RED » Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:16 am

Baseball team pitches for Liverpool FC

Open warfare broke out at Liverpool FC after the club announced that plans for directors to discuss two “excellent” offers to buy the Premier League club, including one from the owners of the Boston Red Sox, were preceded by the current US owners’ efforts to remove two independent board members.

New England Sports Ventures, the holding company for the baseball team, tabled an offer to cover the £280m of debt owed by Liverpool owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett to Royal Bank of Scotland and Wachovia. The offer on the table is believed to be £300m.

Another offer – from the Far East – believed to be of the same magnitude was also discussed by the board.

In a statement on the club’s website on Tuesday night, Liverpool FC said: “The board of directors have received two excellent financial offers to buy the club that would repay all its long-term debt.

“A board meeting was called today to review these bids and approve a sale. Shortly prior to the meeting, the owners – Tom Hicks and George Gillett – sought to remove managing director Christian Purslow and commercial director Ian Ayre from the board, seeking to replace them with Mack Hicks and Lori Kay McCutcheon.”

Mack Hicks is a son of Tom Hicks and a vice-president of his father’s Hicks Holdings sports and real estate group. Ms McCutcheon is also a vice-president of Hicks Holdings.

The statement added that the matter was subject to legal review and that the three independent board directors – chairman Martin Broughton, Mr Purslow and Mr Ayre – would continue to explore the club’s sale at the earliest opportunity.

According to people with knowledge of the protracted and bitter sale process, the independent directors had planned to discuss the offers with the owners on a conference call, and hoped to move the discussion onto details about which of the two to accept.

But the owners, who have placed a much higher valuation on the club, were said to have rejected both offers, a response that was said by one person to have been expected by the independent board members.

Mr Hicks is believed to remain determined to refinance the debt, although he has had one proposal rejected by the independent board members in June after they took legal advice. The deadline for the repayment of the owners’ loan is Friday week.

“The owners are trying to block this sales process,” one person said.

According to another person with knowledge of the situation, NESV’s owner John Henry is in the UK with senior management figures with the intention of “closing the deal”.

While NESV has been interested in Liverpool for some weeks, the Far East interest is believed to have become known only in the past week. NESV’s thinking is that Liverpool would be another iconic sports brand to go with the Boston Red Sox and Roush Fenway Racing, one of the pre-eminent teams in Nascar racing.

But given the hostility of Liverpool fans to the Gillett-Hicks ownership, NESV is believed to be sensitive to any anti-US sentiment from supporters.

http://www.ft.com/cms....amp=rss
HE WHO BETRAYS WILL ALWAYS WALK ALONE
User avatar
NANNY RED
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13334
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 12:45 pm

Postby Simari » Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:16 am

Greedy :censored:, so clear in his statement.
Simari
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 1145
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 11:58 am
Location: London

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 120 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e