Liverpool FC Forum

by **tubby** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:34 pm

LFC2007 wrote:
bavlondon wrote:By Nick Harris

4 August 2010

This bell was telling us the other day that Huang hadn't the backing to takeover. Credible, I think not.

All the rags are bound to be at it over the next few weeks. But all things aside if CIC are behind this deal then I think it could even mean us being richer than City. A frightening thought that, there is too much money in football as it is.

by **Ciggy** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:34 pm

fergieisawhiskeynosedtw@t wrote:all I have done is stick up for our Manager when someone keeps having cheap shots at every opportunity, unbelieveable

This is the last thing I will say on the matter, Ive been on holiday for two weeks I havent given cheap shots as you call them for the past 5-6 weeks, you and your pals are either paranoid or just out to sh!t stir. Incidently whilst I was away certain people kept mentioning Roy in holiday in every other topic obviously looking for a kick off and I wasnt even on the forum ffs.

by **tubby** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:35 pm

Ciggy wrote:Incidently whilst I was away certain people kept mentioning Roy in holiday in every other topic obviously looking for a kick off and I wasnt even on the forum ffs.

by **roberto green** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:38 pm

bavlondon wrote:China’s largest sovereign wealth fund with assets of $332bn, sportingintelligence has learned.

I hear this man is the backer

by **tubby** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:40 pm

I thought he had a $1trillion?

by **Number 9** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:40 pm

bavlondon wrote:
Ciggy wrote:Incidently whilst I was away certain people kept mentioning Roy in holiday in every other topic obviously looking for a kick off and I wasnt even on the forum ffs.

Its orchestrated by a conductor?

by **tubby** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:41 pm

Number 9 wrote:
bavlondon wrote:
Ciggy wrote:Incidently whilst I was away certain people kept mentioning Roy in holiday in every other topic obviously looking for a kick off and I wasnt even on the forum ffs.

Its orchestrated by a conductor?

Is that the autotune thing everyone bangs on about?

by **Igor Zidane** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:42 pm

bigmick wrote:332 billion sounds like a fair bit, feck me. The trouble with all these bidders is you never really know until about six months after you've signed on the dotted line whether you've got the right one or not. The difficulty for me is, I'm not sure if I'd actually be that happy if we got someone rich enough to do a Man City. That for me is a fecking ridiculous carry on, and even if we did win the title under those circumstances I'd be happy but no ecstatic.

My ideal would be someone who'd redevelop the original Anfield site (I know it's probably a non-starter but I think it would be a tragedy to tear it down,) and build it up to around a 60,000 capacity but keep the atmos'. Then, I'd like him or them to give the manager 30 million quid each summer and say off you go (plus of course any money from player sales). If we won the league under those circumstances, then I'd be ecstatic.

If the owner or owners is able to do that and make himself a few quid out of gaming rights on playstation, or on handtowel sales in Shanghai, I couldn't really care less to be honest. That's my ideal owner anyway, although I know it's probably cloud cuckoo land.

totally agree with mick on this one . 100%

by **Reg** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:42 pm

Lads, just because CIS is worth 313 Billion doesnt mean they´re gonna give it all to Woy !

They'd allocate capital and a budget which just like T&T, might be 2/6.

Just 'cos they have a big donger doesnt mean they swing it around above their heads.

by **roberto green** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:42 pm

bavlondon wrote:I thought he had a $1trillion?

Changed it Bav you give me the idea

by **Dundalk** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:45 pm

$332bn

We will defiantly be able to sign Luke Young then :;):

by **Roger Red Hat** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:45 pm

what did i miss?

So is this canadian bunch above board then? and please tell me hicks ins't part of them

by **tubby** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:45 pm

roberto green wrote:
bavlondon wrote:I thought he had a $1trillion?

Changed it Bav you give me the idea

by **bigmick** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:52 pm

If they are all genuine about wanting to get the deal done before the end of the transfer window so we can "strengthen", where does that leave us in terms of targets? Roy said today (and I must confess I believed him) that he was taking no interest whatsoever in the ownership situation, which in itself is fair enough. What happens though if someone comes in with huge wedges and says there you go, you've got a week to spend 35 million quid? Does he have a copy of "classic British Supercars" folded in the centre pages of his exchange and mart, or will he have to completely start again if he's given funds. Someone mentioned Luke Young, and while I quite like him, surely if we've got a lot of cash to splash we won't be buying him. Mind you, would we under those circumstances have re-signed Aurelio either?

I hate to be completely pessimistic, but if I had to put my life on it I don't think it will go through as quickly as we all hope.

by **kopite_1232002** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:53 pm

First of all lakes sorry to here about your nan. been reading your posts for years your a funny guy

Its been a mad few days. been good reading what DVC and bamba post over on rawk but they have gone silent now

What we do know is were coming to the end game and i really do think there is only huang in for us. i think keith harris and the syrian bid are just PR stunts to drive the price up.

what is good is that huang has come out and said he is interested. wheres normally we get a big fat denial.

lets keep our cool we have had 3 years of these horrible :censored:

. whats another few weeks.

Lyndsay you talked about knowing about a bidder a few days before this huang stuff broke was this the bid you knew about

Liverpool FC Forum

TAKEOVER COMPLETE - H & G Finally Jibbed!

Who is online