Peter Crouch general discussion thread - Portsmouth confirm personal terms agreed

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby The Manhattan Project » Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:38 pm

I had my doubts about Crouch initially, but I think he was a success in his time with LFC.

He scored 42 goals in 150 appearances, including blinding overhead kicks against the Turks and Bolton.

He played well despite the constant harrassment from the crowd.


Good luck Crouchie!
china syndrome 80512640 reactor meltdown fusion element
no uniquely indefinable one 5918 identification unknown 113
source transmission 421 general panic hysteria 02 outbreak
foreign mutation 001505 maximum code destruction nuclear
reflection 01044 power plutonium helix atomic energy wave
User avatar
The Manhattan Project
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 5416
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 7:22 am
Location: Reactor Number Four

Postby Penguins » Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:39 pm

I am very dissapointed of the sale.
Not because I think Crouch is a world beater but because
he was our 2nd best striker by far. He scored regurlarly when he got the chance, and noone besides Torres did that for us.

So now we have "No skill" and "Even Less skill" as our hope when Torres is injured and needs rest.
I can live with most of Rafa's stubborness but his love for Kuyt is making me furious.
He can go 20 league games in a row, beeing totally awful, while the better striker Crouch, who scored more goals than kuyt the previous season", has to watch from the bench no matter how pisspoor Kuyt is.

Then when even Rafa realized Kuyt can't score in a brothel as a striker does he let Crouch get a chance??

NOO, instead he changes everything around so his darling Kuyt,the lethal striker, can somehow fit into the team as an extra right back/midfielder or whatever.

Now the pressure is on Rafa to get a new striker or we are screwed. And no, Torres and Kuyt won't work, unless scoring no goals count as a success.

Very dissapointed in how Rafa treated Crouch no matter how well he did, but let Kuyt play game after game leaving Crouch to rot on the bench, no matter how ***** Kuyt was. :veryangry
Penguins
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 2531
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 4:25 am

Postby rafa09 » Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm

Bye fella if abby don,t want to go she can stay with me :devil: you and riises best game was v MANGE fa cup 06 your best goal an riises best ever tacklle with his right foot on alan smith :D
rafa09
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 5:32 pm
Location: skelmersdale uk

Postby MontyPanesarFC » Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:14 pm

Selling Crouch but keeping Voronin...says alot for our ambitions.
Success is spelt Liverpool Football Club
User avatar
MontyPanesarFC
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:51 pm
Location: Liverpool

Postby crazyhorse » Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:39 pm

Bugger, forgot about Voronin... Shame.
Image
Image
Image
THIS IS ANFIELD
User avatar
crazyhorse
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 2249
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 5:43 pm

Postby The Manhattan Project » Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:46 pm

We should put a 15M price tag on Voronin.


That's 15M in Zimbabwe currency

Worth about £3.48.
china syndrome 80512640 reactor meltdown fusion element
no uniquely indefinable one 5918 identification unknown 113
source transmission 421 general panic hysteria 02 outbreak
foreign mutation 001505 maximum code destruction nuclear
reflection 01044 power plutonium helix atomic energy wave
User avatar
The Manhattan Project
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 5416
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 7:22 am
Location: Reactor Number Four

Postby glambertino » Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:59 pm

i'm disappointed too that Crouch will be leaving.  The only positive I see is if it needs to happen to fund a new striker, hopefully a quality goalscorer, neither a 'workhorse' or a 'freebie'
User avatar
glambertino
 
Posts: 99
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 1:03 am

Postby sgs » Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:34 am

bigmick wrote:Good luck to the fella. There has been a bit of protracted debate about whether or not he's any good. Barring injuries, putting my neck on nthe line I'm going for 15 league goals for Pompey next season. I know it's early and all that but I think they're buying a good player.

I should also say that I think it's entirely sensible that we sell him, and that given the fact we've allowed his contract to run down 8Mill with add ons is a decent fee. I didn't have a problem with us "advertising" the fact he was up for sale (that much was obvious given the fact that he only had a year to go and we never played him), my problem was with the initial fee on his head of 15 million quid. Quite clearly we would never have got that in a million years, but thankfully everyone has seen sense in the end.

Anyway I'll say it again so I can be quoted if he bombs out. 15 league goals for Pompey next season, and I won't even include penalties either.



Crouch is'nt worth 15M yet Bent is worth what- 12-13m....

Why are Liverpool players being underpriced and others made to be worth the high valuation?
Last edited by sgs on Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Floyd stepped left and threw the hook that caught Hatton flush under the chin. Finally, the British champ had arrived in that mythical place of which his fans speak: Hatton Wonderland.
sgs
 
Posts: 735
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 9:54 pm

Postby bigmick » Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:48 am

The Manhattan Project wrote:We should put a 15M price tag on Voronin.


That's 15M in Zimbabwe currency

Worth about £3.48.

:D  :laugh: the latest in a long line of Manhatten crackers.

In response to sgs's point, I think the relative transfer value of the two players is probably more to do with the amount of contract left to run than it is an accurate guage of the two players true worth.


That said, I remain convinced that Darren Bent is a very good player indeed and would be more than happy if we bought him as Crouch's replacement. In truth, he would be far more suited to playing up top alone in a 4-5-1 than his clubmate who we are reportedly pursuing, and as such could arguably be a better bet as a second striker/Torres back up.
Last edited by bigmick on Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
"se e in una bottigla ed e bianco, e latte".
User avatar
bigmick
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 12166
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:19 pm
Location: Wimbledon, London.

Postby Rush Job » Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:17 am

bigmick wrote:
The Manhattan Project wrote:We should put a 15M price tag on Voronin.


That's 15M in Zimbabwe currency

Worth about £3.48.

:D  :laugh: the latest in a long line of Manhatten crackers.

In response to sgs's point, I think the relative transfer value of the two players is probably more to do with the amount of contract left to run than it is an accurate guage of the two players true worth.


That said, I remain convinced that Darren Bent is a very good player indeed and would be more than happy if we bought him as Crouch's replacement. In truth, he would be far more suited to playing up top alone in a 4-5-1 than his clubmate who we are reportedly pursuing, and as such could arguably be a better bet as a second striker/Torres back up.

Darren Bent on a good day reminds me of Eto, pacey, direct, likes a shot and most of the time hits the target. Good player.
Dont judge a book by the cover, unless you cover just another, because blind exceptance is a sign,
Of stupid fools who stand in line......  Like..
User avatar
Rush Job
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 2367
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:38 am

Postby SundanceKid » Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:44 am

sgs wrote:
bigmick wrote:Good luck to the fella. There has been a bit of protracted debate about whether or not he's any good. Barring injuries, putting my neck on nthe line I'm going for 15 league goals for Pompey next season. I know it's early and all that but I think they're buying a good player.

I should also say that I think it's entirely sensible that we sell him, and that given the fact we've allowed his contract to run down 8Mill with add ons is a decent fee. I didn't have a problem with us "advertising" the fact he was up for sale (that much was obvious given the fact that he only had a year to go and we never played him), my problem was with the initial fee on his head of 15 million quid. Quite clearly we would never have got that in a million years, but thankfully everyone has seen sense in the end.

Anyway I'll say it again so I can be quoted if he bombs out. 15 league goals for Pompey next season, and I won't even include penalties either.



Crouch is'nt worth 15M yet Bent is worth what- 12-13m....

Why are Liverpool players being underpriced and others made to be worth the high valuation?

Because we don't win a damned thing
"Cut my veins open and I bleed Liverpool red"
Image
User avatar
SundanceKid
 
Posts: 461
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:39 am
Location: Houston, Texas

Postby Redman in wales » Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:14 am

SundanceKid wrote:
sgs wrote:
bigmick wrote:Good luck to the fella. There has been a bit of protracted debate about whether or not he's any good. Barring injuries, putting my neck on nthe line I'm going for 15 league goals for Pompey next season. I know it's early and all that but I think they're buying a good player.

I should also say that I think it's entirely sensible that we sell him, and that given the fact we've allowed his contract to run down 8Mill with add ons is a decent fee. I didn't have a problem with us "advertising" the fact he was up for sale (that much was obvious given the fact that he only had a year to go and we never played him), my problem was with the initial fee on his head of 15 million quid. Quite clearly we would never have got that in a million years, but thankfully everyone has seen sense in the end.

Anyway I'll say it again so I can be quoted if he bombs out. 15 league goals for Pompey next season, and I won't even include penalties either.



Crouch is'nt worth 15M yet Bent is worth what- 12-13m....

Why are Liverpool players being underpriced and others made to be worth the high valuation?

Because we don't win a damned thing

and because Crouch only has a year left on his contract...

£11m or what ever it isis a lot of money for someone with only 1 year left on their contract who'd in all honesty leave the following year anyway.

Look at the fat frank situation as well. £6m or £7m (touted) for someone who 2 seasons ago would have gone for treble that (whether we think he's worth it or not!)
User avatar
Redman in wales
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 4342
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:02 pm
Location: Oxford

Postby club_Levis » Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:13 am

Good luck Peter...useful player at best and will suit Pompey very well.
User avatar
club_Levis
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 4:58 pm

Postby tubby » Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:30 am

Ok so name your top 3 Peter Crouch goals.

For me:

1) Overhead kick vs Galatassaray
2) Goal away vs West Ham (0-2)
3) Header at home to Arsenal (4-1)
My new blog for my upcoming holiday.

http://kunstevie.wordpress.com/
User avatar
tubby
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 22442
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:05 pm

Postby Moop123 » Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:34 am

So once he has gone (I will be sad to see him go as I think he is a good plyer and has done well -although he doesnt fit with how we have been playing recently) who do we think that will replace him!  I cannot see us not getting a replacement!  Torres cant do it all on his own!!!!
User avatar
Moop123
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 11:50 am
Location: Stevenage

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests