Im more interested in who comes in as their replacements than what new players are on the way

LFC1990 » Fri Jun 05, 2015 7:08 pm wrote:Is there any confiirmation that BRs job is safe I mean when KK went under FSG
Firstly Damien Comolii went
Then Steve Clark and Keith Keen
Finally The king was sacked
Kash_Mountain » Fri Jun 05, 2015 10:11 pm wrote:As mentioned previously, it looks like a DoF and Head Coach will be installed quite soon (this is what the review is recommending). FSG are being very tight lipped, can't say I blame them for that. However, if a DoF is installed, i'd expect the DoF to pick all of the coaching staff, that includes Head Coach. Right now that would be BR in that role.
So a Head Coach can ask for certain individuals, but under this DoF scenario, there is no guarantee of getting them. I guess it depends on how LFC implement the role of DoF, but if it goes to plan BR will get some say, but he will most definately not be final decision maker. He may yet walk.
Btw, the review actually involved those conducting it to watch training and how coaches interacted with the players, basically they could see that it was not working and deemed it a terrible setup. Last season when the review started, they had concerns about the defence, this led to LFC bringing in several defenders BR asked for.
red till i die!! » Jun 5th, '15, 22:57 wrote:Kash_Mountain » Fri Jun 05, 2015 10:11 pm wrote:As mentioned previously, it looks like a DoF and Head Coach will be installed quite soon (this is what the review is recommending). FSG are being very tight lipped, can't say I blame them for that. However, if a DoF is installed, i'd expect the DoF to pick all of the coaching staff, that includes Head Coach. Right now that would be BR in that role.
So a Head Coach can ask for certain individuals, but under this DoF scenario, there is no guarantee of getting them. I guess it depends on how LFC implement the role of DoF, but if it goes to plan BR will get some say, but he will most definately not be final decision maker. He may yet walk.
Btw, the review actually involved those conducting it to watch training and how coaches interacted with the players, basically they could see that it was not working and deemed it a terrible setup. Last season when the review started, they had concerns about the defence, this led to LFC bringing in several defenders BR asked for.
As long as they are football people who actually achieved something in the game then it will be an upgrade on what we currently have. Doubt these clowns will thoughIts more likely they will fill it with ex-players to placate the fans.
If they have been watching the training and found problems then that has to fall on rodgers. They are his methods or are we to believe that they weren't.
By all the reports now beginning to break over the shake up it is beginning to look like brenny is a rat who chucked his mates overboard to save his own skin. If he has any loyalty to them he would walk. If anything my money is on the players having a problem with rodgers more so than marsh or pascoe. What a fooking cop out.
I honestly cannot fooking wait to hear the absolute shyte they come out with in the official explanation for all this.
LFC1990 » Sat Jun 06, 2015 1:33 am wrote:Hyypia and Fowler would be good to get on board Hyypia one of our best defenders in history and has had coaching experience with Brighton and Fowler might be able to show our strikers how to hit the net. Cant see BR liking this at all
On the other hand Rene Mulensteen the same Rene Mulensteen who spent 8 years with Manchester United ??
Doeboy » Sat Jun 06, 2015 3:34 pm wrote:Rodgers massively undermined here and weakens his position considerably. Can really only see this ending in one way and will be genuinely surprised if BR is still in the job come Xmas.
FSG obviously not happy and will be having there own imput as to who comes in to make up the backroom staff and I'm not sure BR is in a position to kick back on anyone FSG suggest.
This kind of thing is very unusual and writing on the wall for BR imo
C-R » Sat Jun 06, 2015 3:43 pm wrote:Doeboy » Sat Jun 06, 2015 3:34 pm wrote:Rodgers massively undermined here and weakens his position considerably. Can really only see this ending in one way and will be genuinely surprised if BR is still in the job come Xmas.
FSG obviously not happy and will be having there own imput as to who comes in to make up the backroom staff and I'm not sure BR is in a position to kick back on anyone FSG suggest.
This kind of thing is very unusual and writing on the wall for BR imo
Might well be FSG's plan, take away BR's yes men and appoint there own people thus forcing BR to walk away and therefor FSG no longer have to pay BR the reported 10 million if they were to sack him
ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Jun 6th, '15, 17:56 wrote:It depends how it plays out, if Rodgers has an input to who his new back room team are then it won't be too bad but if it's FSG as FSG alone who are appointing Pascoe's and Marsh successors then I can't see it ending well.
Must admit it doesn't reflect too good on Rodgers that he agreed for his back room team to go but he stays in position himself.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 70 guests