Liverpool FC Forum

heimdall wrote:I can't really see the problem with agroundshare, it's not ideal but if it means we get more moeny coming in every week then surely that is a good thing.

BTW I agree with Karhaz about DIC screwing up in not buying us the first time around, they must bitterly regret not being a bit tougher back then becuase it will now cost them a lot more money if they want LFC. Good businessmen I don't think 

If Hicks and Gillett deliver us another big name signing in this tranfer period then I expect peoples attitudes will start too change a bit, they've already given us Torres and Mascherano, not too bad really.

Don't get me wrong I don't like either of them but I think we have to start getting used to them as they me around for a while, and yes I know I have changed my tune but I was expecting to hear something before now 

heimdall wrote:I can't really see the problem with agroundshare, it's not ideal but if it means we get more moeny coming in every week then surely that is a good thing.

Emerald Red wrote:

heimdall wrote:I can't really see the problem with agroundshare, it's not ideal but if it means we get more moeny coming in every week then surely that is a good thing.

Are you taking the p*ss?

heimdall wrote:I can't really see the problem with agroundshare, it's not ideal but if it means we get more moeny coming in every week then surely that is a good thing.

BTW I agree with Karhaz about DIC screwing up in not buying us the first time around, they must bitterly regret not being a bit tougher back then becuase it will now cost them a lot more money if they want LFC. Good businessmen I don't think 

If Hicks and Gillett deliver us another big name signing in this tranfer period then I expect peoples attitudes will start too change a bit, they've already given us Torres and Mascherano, not too bad really.

Don't get me wrong I don't like either of them but I think we have to start getting used to them as they me around for a while, and yes I know I have changed my tune but I was expecting to hear something before now 

Not a clue.

Go back to the beginning and read up the facts regarding DIC bid they made the offer it was accepted deal done on a hand shake and then they were in what you called property terms gazumted.  They were betrayed by Moores and Parry for a few dollars more . Im suprised there still around wanting to buy us , after what they done .

As far as groundsharein goes not a chance will i share my seat with a bitters

NANNY RED wrote:

heimdall wrote:I can't really see the problem with agroundshare, it's not ideal but if it means we get more moeny coming in every week then surely that is a good thing.

BTW I agree with Karhaz about DIC screwing up in not buying us the first time around, they must bitterly regret not being a bit tougher back then becuase it will now cost them a lot more money if they want LFC. Good businessmen I don't think 

If Hicks and Gillett deliver us another big name signing in this tranfer period then I expect peoples attitudes will start too change a bit, they've already given us Torres and Mascherano, not too bad really.

Don't get me wrong I don't like either of them but I think we have to start getting used to them as they me around for a while, and yes I know I have changed my tune but I was expecting to hear something before now 

Not a clue.

Go back to the beginning and read up the facts regarding DIC bid they made the offer it was accepted deal done on a hand shake and then they were in what you called property terms gazumted.  They were betrayed by Moores and Parry for a few dollars more . Im suprised there still around wanting to buy us , after what they done .

As far as groundsharein goes not a chance will i share my seat with a bitters

heimdall wrote:

Emerald Red wrote:

heimdall wrote:I can't really see the problem with agroundshare, it's not ideal but if it means we get more moeny coming in every week then surely that is a good thing.

Are you taking the p*ss?

No, as I think I stated, it's NOT ideal but if it's the only way we get a bigger stadium and thereby more money then it has to be done. Do you guys really see us getting a new stadium all to ourselves anytime soon with Hicks and Gillett in charge becuase I certainly don't.

Oh and Ciggy, offence taken but don't worry, I'm getting used to small minded attitudes on this forum by now.

It has to be done? Go down the Sandon and spout that bollox, see what you get.

Imagine it:

"Welcome to Kerby Park on this glorious European night. Here we have have Liverpool vs AC Milan. The atmosphere would be electric in here, but it seems that they forgot to include the famous Kop end to suit the blue half of Mersyside. We'd love to get the game underway, but Everton were playing the night before, and the ground staff are still busy cleaning up the sh*t from the stands, and the Tesco bags blowing all over the pitch."

s@int wrote:Heimdall, we will get our new stadium, maybe not when we were promised, maybe not quite what we were promised and maybe not with the present owners. BUT WE WILL GET IT. Its just too good a business opportunity to not become reality, plus the financial pressures will eventually force whoever owns us to increase capacity and thereby revenue.

The worry is that by the time we do get it, we will probably be in even greater debt, and most of the increased revenue will be used to service debt for the forseeable future rather than funding team building.

But will me and you still be alive to go there its gonna take years an years

NANNY RED wrote:

s@int wrote:Heimdall, we will get our new stadium, maybe not when we were promised, maybe not quite what we were promised and maybe not with the present owners. BUT WE WILL GET IT. Its just too good a business opportunity to not become reality, plus the financial pressures will eventually force whoever owns us to increase capacity and thereby revenue.

The worry is that by the time we do get it, we will probably be in even greater debt, and most of the increased revenue will be used to service debt for the forseeable future rather than funding team building.

But will me and you still be alive to go there its gonna take years an years

As Doc Holliday said ...... I'm in my prime 

I think it has to be built soon Nanny, even the two clowns will see that! I think that may be why they are hanging around now, get the stadium built, get the money to service the debt rolling in and then sell at a huge profit.

Thats if the two clowns can raise the money, if not I think they will have to sell sooner rather than later.

Emerald Red wrote:To think, if the Yanks kept their promise of "a spade in the ground" within 60 days, then the stadium would have been half  built by now. Next year, our players could have been walking out onto the new Anfield.

Thats the whole point though Emerald theve promised us Heaven and alls weve got is Hell were not even in purgatory waitin. I get so angry when i come into this thread i should be barred from comin in here. An yet its still the first thing i look at when i come on here . Im just a sad old Bas.tard 

SupitsJonF wrote:Stadiums do take a while to build.  (Once ground is actually broken, but yet that still hasn't happened -_-)

Take a look at this one, stadium (might want to mute your speakers, annoying Texan talking), i hate this team, but it's absolutely beautiful.  And will be ready to be played on in 2010, and the biggest event held in America will be played in 2011.  They broke ground in 05/06.  Holds 80,000 ,it's actually quite insane.

kazza wrote:

SupitsJonF wrote:Stadiums do take a while to build.  (Once ground is actually broken, but yet that still hasn't happened -_-)

Take a look at this one, stadium (might want to mute your speakers, annoying Texan talking), i hate this team, but it's absolutely beautiful.  And will be ready to be played on in 2010, and the biggest event held in America will be played in 2011.  They broke ground in 05/06.  Holds 80,000 ,it's actually quite insane.

They should call it the Cow Bowl.