Igor Zidane wrote:Saint, thanks for posting the info you had , noone is being forced to believe it , it's just abit more info for people to digest and take from it what they want . If people are posting stuff on here in good faith , they should not be castigated for it by Newbies trying to get there post count up . Bellends.

s@int wrote:I do find it rather ironic that the very same people that said the problems between Rafa and H&G were a load of rubbish, are now the loudest in using that very same "rubbish" to defend Rafa.
).
that's just not fair!"

maguskwt wrote:Igor Zidane wrote:Saint, thanks for posting the info you had , noone is being forced to believe it , it's just abit more info for people to digest and take from it what they want . If people are posting stuff on here in good faith , they should not be castigated for it by Newbies trying to get there post count up . Bellends.
refering to?
since i'm the only one with a post count of less than a thousand involved in this discussion about saint's rumour i suppose that you are refering to me...
so FYI... I got better things to do than try to get my damn post count up in an internet forum... and I have already explained to saint that I wasn't castigating him at all... so let it rest...


Igor Zidane wrote:maguskwt wrote:Igor Zidane wrote:Saint, thanks for posting the info you had , noone is being forced to believe it , it's just abit more info for people to digest and take from it what they want . If people are posting stuff on here in good faith , they should not be castigated for it by Newbies trying to get there post count up . Bellends.
refering to?
since i'm the only one with a post count of less than a thousand involved in this discussion about saint's rumour i suppose that you are refering to me...
so FYI... I got better things to do than try to get my damn post count up in an internet forum... and I have already explained to saint that I wasn't castigating him at all... so let it rest...
Now then nobby , is your post count high , no didn't think so ,so i obviously wasn't refering to you. You can join the other t!t if you want. Stop jumping to conclusions and go wobble yer head for abit.
Apology accepted.

maguskwt wrote:"wooohoooo... the feckin newbie is castigating me!... he said 'the story is laughable' "
"wooohoooo... if i call other ppl names and insult them of not having football knowledge then i'm NOT castigating them"
"wooohoooo... you can't defend the manager with the reason that was rumoured because you only chose to believe it after it was revealed as a factthat's just not fair!"
"wooohoooo... heads I win tails you lose"
"wooohoooo... hang them for supporting the feckin manager"
well done mick


bigmick wrote:s@int wrote:I do find it rather ironic that the very same people that said the problems between Rafa and H&G were a load of rubbish, are now the loudest in using that very same "rubbish" to defend Rafa.
And if there's any truth in the rumours this time Saint, the same thing will happen again. While you are posting "laughable" stories, are listening to WUM's and the like at the moment, it's amazing how these things which are currently laughable can suddenly become the accepted gospel.
I mean, "how the feck are we supposed to launch a title challenge while the owners are talking to Klinnsmann in America" (although we can of course launch a Champions league challenge under the same circumstances) could easily become "how the feck are we supposed to launch a title challenge while the captain and vice captain are trying to get a move". Don't shoot the messenger is an old adage which needs to be remembered, as is the fact that Saint is hardly the type of bloke to spam the forum with loads of sh!t, that's my job (thought I'd get that in before somebody else did).
If the rumours which refer to the discontent of Gerrard and Carragher have any truth in them, it will provide an interesting talking point come the end of the season. If they were both to ask for a move, would people take the "well they can feck off, we only want players who want to wear the shirt" route or would they look at the reasoning behind the moves?
For my part I don't think it will come to that. I've long suspected that a significant portion of the squad is split from the managers philosophy and effectively "lost", but I wouldn't have thought it will manifest itself into Gerrard probably and Carragher definately asking for a move. More likely I suspect is that they'll continue to do the best they can under the cuircumstances and wait to see what happens.
maguskwt wrote:Igor Zidane wrote:maguskwt wrote:Igor Zidane wrote:Saint, thanks for posting the info you had , noone is being forced to believe it , it's just abit more info for people to digest and take from it what they want . If people are posting stuff on here in good faith , they should not be castigated for it by Newbies trying to get there post count up . Bellends.
refering to?
since i'm the only one with a post count of less than a thousand involved in this discussion about saint's rumour i suppose that you are refering to me...
so FYI... I got better things to do than try to get my damn post count up in an internet forum... and I have already explained to saint that I wasn't castigating him at all... so let it rest...
Now then nobby , is your post count high , no didn't think so ,so i obviously wasn't refering to you. You can join the other t!t if you want. Stop jumping to conclusions and go wobble yer head for abit.
Apology accepted.
well then... who are you referring to?

Torres 2007 wrote:wheres the actual evidence that DIC are even interested in buying LFC? I mean apart from Tabloid back page stories, amongst other nonsense.
Beleive me, LFC will not change hands twice in 12 months. It's not like selling your second hand TV, selling your stake in the club.
I dont think the yanks should leave either, they have only been here for a short period and have fulfilled much criteria.
Such as:
1. Given Rafa 50 million ish this season alone to buy Torres, Skrtel, Benayoun, Babel. etc.
2. Payed off the clubs 80m debts.
3. Trying to secure funding/ re-finance for the new stadium.
The bill for the new 300/400m stadium was always gonna be a secured loan, and the Americans were never gonna dig that cash out of their owns pockets. Arsenal didnt for the Emirates'
They have a lot on their plate.
Just give it a chance for Hicks and Gillette and see what happens in 2/3 seasons.

Torres 2007 wrote:wheres the actual evidence that DIC are even interested in buying LFC? I mean apart from Tabloid back page stories, amongst other nonsense.
Beleive me, LFC will not change hands twice in 12 months. It's not like selling your second hand TV, selling your stake in the club.
I dont think the yanks should leave either, they have only been here for a short period and have fulfilled much criteria.
Such as:
1. Given Rafa 50 million ish this season alone to buy Torres, Skrtel, Benayoun, Babel. etc.
2. Payed off the clubs 80m debts.
3. Trying to secure funding/ re-finance for the new stadium.
The bill for the new 300/400m stadium was always gonna be a secured loan, and the Americans were never gonna dig that cash out of their owns pockets. Arsenal didnt for the Emirates'
They have a lot on their plate.
Just give it a chance for Hicks and Gillette and see what happens in 2/3 seasons.




Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 97 guests