Liverpool FC Forum

Ciggy wrote:

NANNY RED wrote:Makes you wonder though will we ever see them again and where are they now . considering there supposed to be finalising a huge buiseness deal no one seen or heard of them not even the press here or in America

They are under my patio they shouldnt have come to the party

tw@ts

wheres sinbad when you need him

Pedro Maradona wrote:

lakes10 wrote:I feel sorry for Gillette, he must feel a right dick bring Hicks on board with this deal. with a bit of luck he might order Hick a pair of concrete boots and take him swimming.

you feel sorry for a man who knew he couldnt afford to buy the club in the first place so he brings on board hicks after a discussion at an ice hockey game?
Stop man, Gillett is as bad as Hicks but is less abrasive. They both have the same capitalistic tendancies, they are both liars and have the same goals in mind to bleed Liverpool FC of money.

lakes10 wrote:

Pedro Maradona wrote:

lakes10 wrote:I feel sorry for Gillette, he must feel a right dick bring Hicks on board with this deal. with a bit of luck he might order Hick a pair of concrete boots and take him swimming.

you feel sorry for a man who knew he couldnt afford to buy the club in the first place so he brings on board hicks after a discussion at an ice hockey game?
Stop man, Gillett is as bad as Hicks but is less abrasive. They both have the same capitalistic tendancies, they are both liars and have the same goals in mind to bleed Liverpool FC of money.

if Gillette had got the right man at the start then all this would have not happend. and sorry buts its a very normal thing to do, buy something that you need to take out a loan for.......but just not how G&H have gone about doing and with HICKS SLAGING THE CLUB OFF ALL THE TIME.

lakes10 wrote:

Pedro Maradona wrote:

lakes10 wrote:I feel sorry for Gillette, he must feel a right dick bring Hicks on board with this deal. with a bit of luck he might order Hick a pair of concrete boots and take him swimming.

you feel sorry for a man who knew he couldnt afford to buy the club in the first place so he brings on board hicks after a discussion at an ice hockey game?
Stop man, Gillett is as bad as Hicks but is less abrasive. They both have the same capitalistic tendancies, they are both liars and have the same goals in mind to bleed Liverpool FC of money.

if Gillette had got the right man at the start then all this would have not happend. and sorry buts its a very normal thing to do, buy something that you need to take out a loan for.......but just not how G&H have gone about doing and with HICKS SLAGING THE CLUB OFF ALL THE TIME.

nobybob wrote:

lakes10 wrote:

Pedro Maradona wrote:

lakes10 wrote:I feel sorry for Gillette, he must feel a right dick bring Hicks on board with this deal. with a bit of luck he might order Hick a pair of concrete boots and take him swimming.

you feel sorry for a man who knew he couldnt afford to buy the club in the first place so he brings on board hicks after a discussion at an ice hockey game?
Stop man, Gillett is as bad as Hicks but is less abrasive. They both have the same capitalistic tendancies, they are both liars and have the same goals in mind to bleed Liverpool FC of money.

if Gillette had got the right man at the start then all this would have not happend. and sorry buts its a very normal thing to do, buy something that you need to take out a loan for.......but just not how G&H have gone about doing and with HICKS SLAGING THE CLUB OFF ALL THE TIME.

yes having to get a loan in order to buy somthing is normal!!
What is not normal is getting a loan to buy something that once its bought will need a large investment of money that you dont have< And then lying that you have that money for investment

Ciggy wrote:Lakes Gillette is another snake in the grass @rse b@stard he arranged the meeting with Klinsmann the quiet ones are always the worst as they say.

Dont be fooled he probably feels a kunt for Hicks going public or he is a sh!thouse and thought well he is bigger than me let them tackle him.

One things for sure neither will be able to set foot in Anfield again.

Ciggy wrote:Lakes Gillette is another snake in the grass @rse b@stard he arranged the meeting with Klinsmann the quiet ones are always the worst as they say.

Dont be fooled he probably feels a kunt for Hicks going public or he is a sh!thouse and thought well he is bigger than me let them tackle him.

One things for sure neither will be able to set foot in Anfield again.

one thing i am not made at the for is seeking another manager, but i am made that they come out and said it,we looked for anither manager before when we still had GH as manager...but one thing we did not do was to come out and tell the press .

nobybob wrote:

lakes10 wrote:

nobybob wrote:

lakes10 wrote:

nobybob wrote:

lakes10 wrote:

nobybob wrote:

lakes10 wrote:

nobybob wrote:

lakes10 wrote:

nobybob wrote:

lakes10 wrote:

nobybob wrote:

Kukilon wrote:I'm not going to pay one dime more to the club until these two asshats are gone. They will will get the message eventually when more people do it. I today cancelled my liverpoolfc.tv membership and my sport channel subscription.

totaly agree

ok i put this to you.
all fans stop buying anything to do with the club, some even stop going to the games.

do you know what will happen?

the club will not be making any money and the loss will be so big no one would even look at buying the club......and we end up like LEEDS.

wrong it just means G&H asking price would have to drop making it easier for DIC to buy  thus bringing in more money to LFC . You got it all ar$e about t!t

wrong, the loan is on the club. what would happen is the club would pass into the hands of the administrators, after the administrators sell bit of the club off to anyone they would then look for a buyer (just look at Luton).

Wrong G&H would not let it pass to administrators they would sell up like a shot while they could still make money on us . Come on lakes think about it mate put yourself in G&H position the club would not go into admin it would be sold most likely to DIC  cos they know once G&H have gone normal service will be resumed and we will turn the money tap back on

sorry mate it dont worlk like that, you see if it started to look like they could not pay the loan off the Bank can step in at anytime. thats is the law (as the loan from the bank is for the club then the Bank sort of own the club, so if any looks out of order the bank just take the club, its the law, bit like how some the thier home taken bank).

you conpare the situation to having your home reposesed by the banks. well the banks cant come straight in and take your home the minute say for example you became unemployed and your income stoped NO, they have to wait until you miss  X amount of morgage payments. Well G&H wont let it go that far the minute the cash stops coming in they would sell up

if the cash stops coming in and they sell the club then they would need to sell it for the same amout that is left to pay off on the loan. The club needs to be fluid (money coming in) for it to be sold when there is a loan on it.

as i said the loan is on the club, if G&H can not pay off the loan the bank casn take the club and then sell it  (LUTON).

the money they are using for our club will all be the banks money......and its on LOAN.

true if the cash stopped coming in they would need to sell for the same amount as the loan AGREED (but) DIC would be willing to more than pay that amount because!! we don't need to have money coming in our assets cover more than that AND like i said DIC know the withdrawing of our cash as supporters is only temporary while G&H are here
LETS look at an analogy a silly one but hey
imagine LFC were a gold mine owned by G&H but the miners (us the supporters ) were on strike willing only to work if new owners came in. there's gold in them there hills but G&H cant get it so what does he do keep losing money or sell up?? DIC know the miners will go straight back to work once they buy so they arnt ar$ed its making no money now.

LOL u compare us to LUTON completely different we are a global franchise with a fan base and history 2nd to none there are plenty of potential buyers out there would just love to have a piece of us.
And yes i know its a loan but as i have already said the banks cant just step in unless G&H miss there payments !! and IF G&H think they are going to miss there payments they would sell  SHALL I SAY IT MORE SLOWLY FOR YOU??

lol i do understand what you are saying but its still a loan, yes you are right the bank can not do anything untill they miss a payment.......or stop paying its employees.

but if they looked like missing payments when they try to sell the club and have to show the book to the new bidders the club would not be solvent. they would be offerd about £150m in that case.

lol we agree to a large extent but DIC have already seen the books G&H tried to sell them 15% remember . They are not stupid
                       value before buying
clubs earnings - money spent by surporters = x amount
                         
                        value after buying
clubs earnings +money spent by surporters = bloody good deal

lol i wonder what the books are going to look like now once this new loans done.

monday   £1

Thursday £350 m

see we are in complete agreement lmao

  that or the thread was just getting too long lol

Ciggy wrote:Behave you two with your multiple quotes its annoying

Aaron wrote:BBC

Liverpool's American owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett have finalised the £350m refinancing deal to secure their immediate future at Anfield.

The financial package is expected to help the duo repay money borrowed for their £218.9m takeover in March 2007.

It also means that the club can finally launch their long-awaited plan for a new stadium at Stanley Park.

BBC sports editor Mihir Bose said £60m of the package will provide the start-up money for the new ground.

The deal, which is expected to be announced on Friday, is seen as a reaffirmation of Hicks's determination to remain at Anfield along with co-owner Gillett, despite interest from Dubai International Capital (DIC).

Hicks will also feel he will be in a stronger position should he decide to sell in the future, dealing a blow to DIC's hopes of mounting a swift bid to take control at Anfield.

The American pair were the target of crowd demonstrations from Liverpool supporters unhappy with their regime during Monday's televised game against Aston Villa, with banners calling for DIC to mount a bid.

But Hicks, in particular, remained defiant in the face of protests and insisted he had no intention of selling his 50% share in the club.


!!!!!