Liverpool FC Forum

by **LiverpoolMadman** » Mon Mar 07, 2011 12:46 pm

http://www.empireofthekop.com/anfield/?p=30498

by **dawson99** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 1:12 pm

out of tomorrows game on thursday, club will give the reason later today.. whats that about?

by **metalhead** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 1:16 pm

dawson99 wrote:out of tomorrows game on thursday, club will give the reason later today.. whats that about?

groin problem

by **SouthCoastShankly** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 1:40 pm

PabloMedina28 wrote:Despite what i say about it being best we cash in on him IMHO i have no doubt if he plays more disciplined he can still be a major assest for us until he retires and this iswhat my heart wants.

More importantly it is what the majority of diehard support want. We don't want to lose our captain.

He has bailed us out of numerous games where we were staring defeat in the eyes. Ok he disappointed us by nearly leaving for Chelsea, but unlike Torres he didn't go, he made a u-turn and stayed.

His performances clearly are under-par and out of sorts but this is clearly driven by injury and subsequent lack of fitness. Not due to lack of talent.

Also it is worth pointing out that his material value is nothing compared to his value 3 seasons ago, we would struggle to get £20m for him, more like £10-15m. Sorry but even an unfit and injury prone Gerrard is worth more than £20m to us.

It amazes me the reaction of some against Torres and his disloyalty yet some here are willing to get rid of Gerrard because he is having an off season. Talk about hypocritical, loyalty runs both ways.

by **PabloMedina28** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:23 am

SouthCoastShankly wrote:
PabloMedina28 wrote:Despite what i say about it being best we cash in on him IMHO i have no doubt if he plays more disciplined he can still be a major assest for us until he retires and this iswhat my heart wants.

More importantly it is what the majority of diehard support want. We don't want to lose our captain.

He has bailed us out of numerous games where we were staring defeat in the eyes. Ok he disappointed us by nearly leaving for Chelsea, but unlike Torres he didn't go, he made a u-turn and stayed.

His performances clearly are under-par and out of sorts but this is clearly driven by injury and subsequent lack of fitness. Not due to lack of talent.

Also it is worth pointing out that his material value is nothing compared to his value 3 seasons ago, we would struggle to get £20m for him, more like £10-15m. Sorry but even an unfit and injury prone Gerrard is worth more than £20m to us.

It amazes me the reaction of some against Torres and his disloyalty yet some here are willing to get rid of Gerrard because he is having an off season. Talk about hypocritical, loyalty runs both ways.

Im loyal to the club and want whats best for Liverpool fc, i want him to stay until he retires but i feel wed be better cashing in on him. Its not just one season its nearly 2 (i dont do kneejerk reactions) that hes been on the downslide and how can people defend him by bring up injurys? Oh well thats ok he cant give 100% because hes never fit. Thats one of the problems and like i said hes 32 in the summer so hes gonna keep getting injuried until he retires. Every dog has hes day it doesnt mean coming to terms with this is being disloyal. Wed get far more then 20 million for him simple because hes a living legend worldwide and he could sell bucketloads of shirts wherever he went. Plus thiers the wages it would release for other players coming in.

by **Kenny Kan** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:29 am

PabloMedina28 wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:
PabloMedina28 wrote:Despite what i say about it being best we cash in on him IMHO i have no doubt if he plays more disciplined he can still be a major assest for us until he retires and this iswhat my heart wants.

More importantly it is what the majority of diehard support want. We don't want to lose our captain.

He has bailed us out of numerous games where we were staring defeat in the eyes. Ok he disappointed us by nearly leaving for Chelsea, but unlike Torres he didn't go, he made a u-turn and stayed.

His performances clearly are under-par and out of sorts but this is clearly driven by injury and subsequent lack of fitness. Not due to lack of talent.

Also it is worth pointing out that his material value is nothing compared to his value 3 seasons ago, we would struggle to get £20m for him, more like £10-15m. Sorry but even an unfit and injury prone Gerrard is worth more than £20m to us.

It amazes me the reaction of some against Torres and his disloyalty yet some here are willing to get rid of Gerrard because he is having an off season. Talk about hypocritical, loyalty runs both ways.

Im loyal to the club and want whats best for Liverpool fc, i want him to stay until he retires but i feel wed be better cashing in on him. Its not just one season its nearly 2 (i dont do kneejerk reactions) that hes been on the downslide and how can people defend him by bring up injurys? Oh well thats ok he cant give 100% because hes never fit. Thats one of the problems and like i said hes 32 in the summer so hes gonna keep getting injuried until he retires. Every dog has hes day it doesnt mean coming to terms with this is being disloyal. Wed get far more then 20 million for him simple because hes a living legend worldwide and he could sell bucketloads of shirts wherever he went. Plus thiers the wages it would release for other players coming in.

you talk c.rap.

by **Kenny Kan** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:55 am

Over on RAWK they're saying he 'could' be out for the rest of the season.

by **stmichael** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:59 am

I personally just think he's devastated because Phil Collins has retired

by **metalhead** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:04 pm

PabloMedina28 wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:
PabloMedina28 wrote:Despite what i say about it being best we cash in on him IMHO i have no doubt if he plays more disciplined he can still be a major assest for us until he retires and this iswhat my heart wants.

More importantly it is what the majority of diehard support want. We don't want to lose our captain.

He has bailed us out of numerous games where we were staring defeat in the eyes. Ok he disappointed us by nearly leaving for Chelsea, but unlike Torres he didn't go, he made a u-turn and stayed.

His performances clearly are under-par and out of sorts but this is clearly driven by injury and subsequent lack of fitness. Not due to lack of talent.

Also it is worth pointing out that his material value is nothing compared to his value 3 seasons ago, we would struggle to get £20m for him, more like £10-15m. Sorry but even an unfit and injury prone Gerrard is worth more than £20m to us.

It amazes me the reaction of some against Torres and his disloyalty yet some here are willing to get rid of Gerrard because he is having an off season. Talk about hypocritical, loyalty runs both ways.

Im loyal to the club and want whats best for Liverpool fc, i want him to stay until he retires but i feel wed be better cashing in on him. Its not just one season its nearly 2 (i dont do kneejerk reactions) that hes been on the downslide and how can people defend him by bring up injurys? Oh well thats ok he cant give 100% because hes never fit. Thats one of the problems and like i said hes 32 in the summer so hes gonna keep getting injuried until he retires. Every dog has hes day it doesnt mean coming to terms with this is being disloyal. Wed get far more then 20 million for him simple because hes a living legend worldwide and he could sell bucketloads of shirts wherever he went. Plus thiers the wages it would release for other players coming in.

from your reasoning it means that we should sell all of our first team because all have been :censored:

for the past 2 seasons

by **Waldo** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:25 pm

Massive blow if Gerrard is to miss the majority of the run in and it leaves a big gap in the team. But, it very much looks like our chances of qualifying for Champs League has gone, so if it is to mean that he misses games now and comes back fit and well for the new season then maybe that would be the best thing in the med-long term.

by **tomjay** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:29 pm

a fully fit stevie g would walk onto any team in europe..fact!!

by **Aussie Style** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:13 pm

tomjay wrote:a fully fit stevie g would walk onto any team in europe..fact!!

Barca?

by **PabloMedina28** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:36 pm

Kenny Kan wrote:Over on RAWK they're saying he 'could' be out for the rest of the season.

LOOOOOL i guess i was talking :censored:

about his injuries. Idiot

by **PabloMedina28** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:39 pm

metalhead wrote:
PabloMedina28 wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:
PabloMedina28 wrote:Despite what i say about it being best we cash in on him IMHO i have no doubt if he plays more disciplined he can still be a major assest for us until he retires and this iswhat my heart wants.

More importantly it is what the majority of diehard support want. We don't want to lose our captain.

He has bailed us out of numerous games where we were staring defeat in the eyes. Ok he disappointed us by nearly leaving for Chelsea, but unlike Torres he didn't go, he made a u-turn and stayed.

His performances clearly are under-par and out of sorts but this is clearly driven by injury and subsequent lack of fitness. Not due to lack of talent.

Also it is worth pointing out that his material value is nothing compared to his value 3 seasons ago, we would struggle to get £20m for him, more like £10-15m. Sorry but even an unfit and injury prone Gerrard is worth more than £20m to us.

It amazes me the reaction of some against Torres and his disloyalty yet some here are willing to get rid of Gerrard because he is having an off season. Talk about hypocritical, loyalty runs both ways.

Im loyal to the club and want whats best for Liverpool fc, i want him to stay until he retires but i feel wed be better cashing in on him. Its not just one season its nearly 2 (i dont do kneejerk reactions) that hes been on the downslide and how can people defend him by bring up injurys? Oh well thats ok he cant give 100% because hes never fit. Thats one of the problems and like i said hes 32 in the summer so hes gonna keep getting injuried until he retires. Every dog has hes day it doesnt mean coming to terms with this is being disloyal. Wed get far more then 20 million for him simple because hes a living legend worldwide and he could sell bucketloads of shirts wherever he went. Plus thiers the wages it would release for other players coming in.

from your reasoning it means that we should sell all of our first team because all have been for the past 2 seasons

No they havent and not all of them are 32 soon. Some of you lot on her are liek Gerrards wife stop getting your knivkers in a twist because hes on teh downslide. It happens with every footballer deal with it. Anyway ive said in earlier posts id get rid of most of the squad.

by **PabloMedina28** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:41 pm

tomjay wrote:a fully fit stevie g would walk onto any team in europe..fact!!

Key Words: When fully fit. Some peopel just cant move on

Liverpool FC Forum

STEVEN GERRARD - Official Thread

Who is online