
maypaxvobiscum wrote:Ciggy wrote:In english please Reg.
In Texas Law
RULE 12. ATTORNEY TO SHOW AUTHORITY
A party in a suit or proceeding pending in a court of this state may, by sworn written motion stating
that he believes the suit or proceeding is being prosecuted or defended without authority, cause the
attorney to be cited to appear before the court and show his authority to act. The notice of the motion
shall be served upon the challenged attorney at least ten days before the hearing on the motion. At
the hearing on the motion, the burden of proof shall be upon the challenged attorney to show
sufficient authority to prosecute or defend the suit on behalf of the other party. Upon his failure to
show such authority, the court shall refuse to permit the attorney to appear in the cause, and shall
strike the pleadings if no person who is authorized to prosecute or defend appears. The motion may
be heard and determined at any time before the parties have announced ready for trial, but the trial
shall not be unnecessarily continued or delayed for the hearing.
our lawyers have to go to court to prove that the TRO obtained by Hicks is invalid on the grounds that the British courts have ruled otherwise and even gave a time as to when the meeting regarding the owners have to take place - 8pm. Hicks claims the meeting was illegal but it is not as it was a result of the judgement by Floyd J.
Ciggy wrote:The Dallas Morning News this morning reports:
Dallas businessman Tom Hicks persuaded a state judge to halt the sale of Liverpool Football Club on Wednesday and may have gained something new in the battle: home field advantage...State District Judge Jim Jordan agreed with the lawsuit's argument that the defendants have done enough business in North Texas to fall under a Dallas court's control.
Greavesie wrote:I'm definitely up for that, though I've thought of about 1000 ways to kill them so I'll have to wittle it down to one, suppose I can do that on the flight
mistyred wrote:Wow this whole thing is just of the f uckin chain, i cant believe it i nearly just pi ssed myself with the "Jail them" bit![]()
See thats why birth control should be handed out by law stop these kinds of kNob Jockeys from being conceived.
maypaxvobiscum wrote:Greavesie wrote:I'm definitely up for that, though I've thought of about 1000 ways to kill them so I'll have to wittle it down to one, suppose I can do that on the flight
Mistyred can be our bodyguard and perhaps Metalhead could supply the ammo since he's got easy access in the Middle East
Reg wrote:maypaxvobiscum wrote:Ciggy wrote:edit
our lawyers have to go to court to prove that the TRO obtained by Hicks is invalid on the grounds that the British courts have ruled otherwise and even gave a time as to when the meeting regarding the owners have to take place - 8pm. Hicks claims the meeting was illegal but it is not as it was a result of the judgement by Floyd J.
'.....the burden of proof shall be upon the challenged attorney to show sufficient authority to prosecute or defend the suit on behalf of the other party'
I´m hoping that a clear and unequivical ruling from Justice Flood this afternoon will act as sufficient 'proof' to indicate to Judge Jim Jordan to feck off and mind his own business.
Reg wrote:jacdaniel wrote:QC Chivers is up, speaking for G&H.
Martin Chivers of Spurs - he always was shíte.
Greavesie wrote:maypaxvobiscum wrote:Greavesie wrote:I'm definitely up for that, though I've thought of about 1000 ways to kill them so I'll have to wittle it down to one, suppose I can do that on the flight
Mistyred can be our bodyguard and perhaps Metalhead could supply the ammo since he's got easy access in the Middle East
Dawson can be the pilot![]()
there you go, the A team right there
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests