metalhead wrote:Redangel wrote:2.07pm: Liverpool fans who are planning to launch a counter claim Class Action against H&G have set up a Facebook page.
joined!
link me up dude. thanks
TAKEOVER COMPLETE - H & G Finally Jibbed!
by maypaxvobiscum » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:23 pm
link me up dude. thanks
-
maypaxvobiscum - Posts: 9665
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 7:02 am
- Location: Singapore
by Anfield rapper » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:23 pm
2.20pm: QC Snowden speaking for RBS: Accuses H&G of preparing injunction request before yesterday's verdict here and anger that it was not disclosed during the trial by H&G legal team in the High Court.
BBC's Dan Roan tweets: "H&G's lawyers haven't turned up"
THEY GOT TO BE FVCKED THIS TIME
BBC's Dan Roan tweets: "H&G's lawyers haven't turned up"
THEY GOT TO BE FVCKED THIS TIME
-
Anfield rapper - LFC Super Member
- Posts: 1130
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 12:08 pm
by andy_g » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:24 pm
basically this boils down to a battle between the UK legal system and the US legal system, right? why don't we just go to war with america?
Get up! everybody's gonna move their feet
Get Down! everybody's gonna leave their seat
-
andy_g - >> LFC Elite Member <<
- Posts: 9598
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 10:39 am
by jacdaniel » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:27 pm
maypaxvobiscum wrote:metalhead wrote:Redangel wrote:2.07pm: Liverpool fans who are planning to launch a counter claim Class Action against H&G have set up a Facebook page.
joined!
link me up dude. thanks
http://www.facebook.com/pages....&v=wall
Facebook page
"When you walk, through a storm, hold your head up high"
-
jacdaniel - LFC Super Member
- Posts: 2616
- Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 12:44 pm
- Location: Dublin
by Greavesie » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:27 pm
andy_g wrote:basically this boils down to a battle between the UK legal system and the US legal system, right? why don't we just go to war with america?
its probably the more straighforward of our options lets be honest
All round the fields of Anfield Road
Where once we watched the King Kenny play (and could he play!)
Stevie Heighway on the wing
We had dreams and songs to sing
'Bout the glory, round the Fields of Anfield Road
JFT 96 - Gone but never forgotten
YNWA 15/4/1989
God Bless You All
Where once we watched the King Kenny play (and could he play!)
Stevie Heighway on the wing
We had dreams and songs to sing
'Bout the glory, round the Fields of Anfield Road
JFT 96 - Gone but never forgotten
YNWA 15/4/1989
God Bless You All
-
Greavesie - Posts: 9100
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 2:29 am
- Location: Newcastle
by Thommo's perm » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:28 pm
andy_g wrote:basically this boils down to a battle between the UK legal system and the US legal system, right? why don't we just go to war with america?
Its like Rumpole versus LA Law
-
Thommo's perm - Posts: 6383
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 11:57 am
- Location: liverpool
by laza » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:29 pm
Ive cheered on many wins and lamented many losses, from highs of Rome to Istanbul and 80s league titles a ten a penny. Cried over the horrors that were Hillsborough and Heysel and lived in denial during 20 year wait for grail to return where it should be.
Now in 2010, Ive been reduced to watching Rumpole of Bailey play out via twitter, its a funny old game
Now in 2010, Ive been reduced to watching Rumpole of Bailey play out via twitter, its a funny old game
Forever Red in this life and the next
-
laza - >> LFC Elite Member <<
- Posts: 8408
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 11:17 am
- Location: The Sharkbait captial of the world
by maguskwt » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:31 pm
Greavesie wrote:andy_g wrote:basically this boils down to a battle between the UK legal system and the US legal system, right? why don't we just go to war with america?
its probably the more straighforward of our options lets be honest
UK won't stand a chance against the US Army on its own...
Ask the french to help...
- maguskwt
- >> LFC Elite Member <<
- Posts: 8232
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:39 pm
by Redangel » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:34 pm
2.28pm: While we wait for Sachin to next get a chance to step outside court and update, here is some legal opinion from Quentin Bargate, Senior Partner of the City of London law firm Bargate Murray:
W
hat struck me as most unusual was that the proceedings already taking place before the High Court in London merit only a passing reference in paragraph 53 of the petition...More surprisingly, I can find no reference in the Temporary Restraining Order made by the court in Dallas to the "British Court" decision at all. The court asserts it has jurisdiction without, it would seem, considering the possible impact of its order upon the already extant proceedings in London and whether the Dallas court should accordingly decline jurisdiction in favour of the High Court proceedings – where Mr Hicks and Mr Gillett may well have raised similar points already.
In short, it would appear that Mr Hicks and Mr Gillett's legal team decided against the option of seeking permission to appeal from the Court of Appeal, or decided that process would not yield a result in time and instead have attempted to take a second bite at the cherry in a different jurisdiction. Clearly, the Dallas court agrees that they were entitled to do so, at least for the time being.
So in essence, we have two diametrically opposing decisions of superior courts in England and the US based on essentially the same subject matter. It will be interesting to see what the High Court in London makes of all this...
Let's hope we find out soon...
W
hat struck me as most unusual was that the proceedings already taking place before the High Court in London merit only a passing reference in paragraph 53 of the petition...More surprisingly, I can find no reference in the Temporary Restraining Order made by the court in Dallas to the "British Court" decision at all. The court asserts it has jurisdiction without, it would seem, considering the possible impact of its order upon the already extant proceedings in London and whether the Dallas court should accordingly decline jurisdiction in favour of the High Court proceedings – where Mr Hicks and Mr Gillett may well have raised similar points already.
In short, it would appear that Mr Hicks and Mr Gillett's legal team decided against the option of seeking permission to appeal from the Court of Appeal, or decided that process would not yield a result in time and instead have attempted to take a second bite at the cherry in a different jurisdiction. Clearly, the Dallas court agrees that they were entitled to do so, at least for the time being.
So in essence, we have two diametrically opposing decisions of superior courts in England and the US based on essentially the same subject matter. It will be interesting to see what the High Court in London makes of all this...
Let's hope we find out soon...
- Redangel
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 3:39 pm
- Location: Merseyside
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
-
- Related topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- Takeover -on again? - Talk of takeover surfaces again
1, 2by daddyo » Wed Sep 14, 2005 10:59 am - 26 Replies
- 3780 Views
- Last post by wrighty (not mark!)
Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:57 am
- Takeover -on again? - Talk of takeover surfaces again
-
- Another deal complete
1, 2
by A.B. » Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:47 am
- 25 Replies
- 4792 Views
- Last post by Noise Noise
Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:35 pm
- Another deal complete
-
- What a complete toe-rag ! - Ronnie whelan..
1, 2by bunglemark2 » Wed Sep 15, 2010 10:41 pm - 16 Replies
- 3201 Views
- Last post by neil
Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:50 pm
- What a complete toe-rag ! - Ronnie whelan..
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 90 guests
-
- Advertisement