TAKEOVER COMPLETE - H & G Finally Jibbed!

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby Reg » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:40 pm

Ciggy wrote:Reg give us some info please mate do they have a case or not? Is this aloud?

Logically under UK law the Dallas court holds no sway.

Thats said if Hicks asked for an injunction and had nothing to base it on, the judge would have sent him on his way.

It appears in granting the injunction the judge is satisfied there is cause. The injunction however is more of a request as they have no authority over English Law so its now up to a UK judge to throw it out.

Until now, John Henry is a common man in the street, he is not LFC so I'm not sure a judge can place any injunction on him, only LFC who are the subject of the dispute.

As I've said, possession is 9/10ths of the law and Hicks has to play this last card to hold on before losing everything. Basically Hicks is trying to stop the sale process however I suspect Grabo will whack this one over the mainstand as he did the last one.

Fingers crossed lads and lasses.

And now I'm going home to show my boys my new Liverpool shirt with Torres on the back. They'll be gutted.
User avatar
Reg
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13725
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 12:24 am
Location: Singapore

Postby Simari » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:41 pm

shabelle50 wrote:
Simari wrote:
shabelle50 wrote:I can't see how a Texan court can ride over an english court but if there was another bid some time ago to the tune of £400 billion one has to ask the question did Broughton consider it?

If it was presented to the board, ofcourse he would have considered it. There would be official minutes recorded against this.

It's not like MB can hide any of this ... provided it was indeed presented to the board and not to Hicks riding on his pony on some lawn in yeeeehaaaaa country ...

Why reject a higher offer even if Broughton knew it would ensure the owners would be gone? Saying that though they'd have come back saying it still wasn't high enough and another bid had been made giving them more. Whatever Broughton had done Hicks wouldn't have accepted it. The man is like a wild animal out of control. How did we ever end up with this monster owning LFC? Aren't the real culprits here Moores and Parry for not being diligent three years ago? Maybe they should be the ones facing a lawsuit from LFC fans for helping to nearly destroy our club.

On Moores and Parry not being diligent, hindsight is always 20-20. But I won't argue that one. Really should have done a lot more in terms of simply assessing character, to begin with.

Hicks has always been a complete ar.sehole.

The only thing I can gather from this is that he could be in financial ruin if the sale went through and hence is doing everything he can to salvage something.

Either that or he is on a dangerous warpath.
Simari
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 1145
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 11:58 am
Location: London

Postby burjennio » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:41 pm

NorfolkRed wrote:anyone else thinking losing 9 points just to get shot of these clowns might actually be worth it right now :(

Mate Im thinking 20-25 years might be worth doing to get rid of this lot!
User avatar
burjennio
 
Posts: 3333
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:17 pm
Location: belfast

Postby RED BEERGOGGLES » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:42 pm

Listen just earlier on we were all extolling the virtues of Martin Broughton ,do people honestly think a man steeped in business acumen would not have every avenue these cunts can take well and truly boxed off .... come on people lets enjoy Today because in the world of Big Business these fuckers are dead in the water :D
Image
User avatar
RED BEERGOGGLES
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8297
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 11:03 pm
Location: Liverpool

Postby NorfolkRed » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:45 pm

trying to keep the faith but the rollercoaster ride is getting too much
NorfolkRed
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 10:03 am

Postby NANNY RED » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:47 pm

From a new poster on TIA:

Hey guys, now that Hicks has filed suit in the Us, i felt compelled to respond.

I am a second year law student in the US and this is not good. Jurisdiction in the American courts is a low bar. We have a "minimal contacts" standard meaning that if any of the directors have ANY personal contacts with Texas, the court may have jurisdiction over them. However, that is dependent on the nature of the contacts. As far as RBS and NESV, there is little doubt that the court can get jurisdiction over them. At the very least, everyone sued will have to make a special appearance in the court to contest jurisdiction.

It's hard for me to know what the likely outcome of Hicks's claim is because I don't know what legal theory he is filing suit under. However, if it involves the breach of the agreement Hicks made with RBS that was adjudicated in England, then the ruling there should be respected here.

Bottom line, this is going to get ugly, they have a valid restraining order. I have no idea the enforceability of that in England. I can try to see if I can find an electronic filing of Hicks's claim to the court. Most likely I won't be able to, but I'll try.

Hicks has just gone all in, what a **** face! These are the type of people who are killing this country, I am utterly ashamed that these :censored: were let anywhere near the club.
HE WHO BETRAYS WILL ALWAYS WALK ALONE
User avatar
NANNY RED
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13334
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 12:45 pm

Postby kunilson » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:48 pm

why dont they just die
Image
User avatar
kunilson
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 1031
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 11:39 pm

Postby Boocity » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:48 pm

Does anyone know anything about this new bunch supposed to have offered between £375 and £400 million and a new stadium?
User avatar
Boocity
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 5147
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 10:13 am
Location: Abu Dhabi

Postby JBG » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:49 pm

Its a desperate act. It appears to be a temporary injunction against NESV based on the fact that it appears that somewhere down the line one of Kop Holdings Ltd's holding companies are registered in Delaware. It appears they are trying to temporarily stop one US entity from moving against an asset of another US entity (hence the appearance before a Texan court) and its a blatent attempt at trying to stop NESV completing the sale.

I very much doubt it'll make any impact at all on NESV: its a joke and I'd be amazed if they withdrew over a nonsense like this.
Jolly Bob Grumbine.
User avatar
JBG
LFC Elite Member
 
Posts: 10621
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2003 1:32 pm

Postby bigmick » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:50 pm

I knew the c...s wouldn't let it go, I just had a feeling.
"se e in una bottigla ed e bianco, e latte".
User avatar
bigmick
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 12166
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:19 pm
Location: Wimbledon, London.

Postby inglis5 » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:53 pm

Boocity wrote:Does anyone know anything about this new bunch supposed to have offered between £375 and £400 million and a new stadium?

Kirdi probably.
Image
User avatar
inglis5
 
Posts: 324
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:13 pm

Postby bigmick » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:53 pm

They obviously had this as a fallback knowing full well they were going to lose the initial case.
"se e in una bottigla ed e bianco, e latte".
User avatar
bigmick
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 12166
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:19 pm
Location: Wimbledon, London.

Postby Ciggy » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:56 pm

The owners of Liverpool Football Club today reported that a Texas State District Court has granted a temporary restraining order (TRO) enjoining the Board of Liverpool Football Club (LFC) from executing a sale of the Club to New England Sports Ventures (NESV). The court set a hearing date of October 25, 2010.

The TRO request, signed by Judge Jim Jordan of the 160th District Court in Dallas, was part of a lawsuit filed today by the owners of LFC against Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), Martin Broughton, Christian Purslow, Ian Ayre, NESV and Philip Nash. The lawsuit also seeks temporary and permanent injunctions, and damages totaling approximately $1.6 billion (over £1 billion).

The suit lays out the defendants' "epic swindle" in which they conspired to devise and execute a scheme to sell LFC to NESV at a price they know to be hundreds of millions of dollars below true market value (and well below Forbes magazine's recent independent $822 million valuation of the club) - and below multiple expressions of interest and offers to buy either the club in its entirety or make minority investments (including Meriton and Mill Financial). It describes how the defendants excluded the owners from meetings, discussions and communications regarding the potential sale to NESV and interfered with efforts by the owners to obtain financing for Liverpool FC.

The Club's owners are represented by attorneys from the international law firm of Fish & Richardson.

The following are some of the key points in the complaint, which details the roles of RBS and the other defendants, and also describes previously undisclosed offers to purchase LFC:

"The Director Defendants were acting merely as pawns of RBS, wholly abdicating the fiduciary responsibilities that they owed in the sale."

"RBS has been complicit in this scheme with the Director Defendants. For example, in letters from RBS to potential investors obtained just within the past few days, RBS has informed investors that it will approve of a deal only if there is "no economic return to equity" for Messrs. Hicks and Gillett. In furtherance of this grand conspiracy, on information and belief, RBS has improperly used its influence as the club's creditor and as a worldwide banking leader to prevent any transaction that would permit Messrs. Hicks and Gillett to recover any of their initial investment in the club, much less share in the substantial appreciation in the value of Liverpool FC that their investments have created."

"On or about October 4, 2010, Mr. Hicks received a letter of interest from a third potential purchaser represented by FBR Capital Markets ("FBR"), offering to purchase Liverpool FC for £375 to £400 million ($595 to $635 million). The letter informed Mr. Hicks that the potential purchaser would not need financing, possessed the funds to close the transaction, and intended to build a new stadium for Liverpool FC."

"Additionally, the Plaintiffs learned just days ago about another potential investor that made a similar offer in the £350 to £400 million range that was communicated to Defendant Broughton and another unnamed co-conspirator in late August. According to this investor, Mr. Broughton never responded to the offer. Moreover, when the purported sale to NESV was announced, this investor again contacted Mr. Broughton and informed him that the offer, which significantly exceeded the NESV offer, was still on the table. Again, Mr. Broughton brushed this offer aside without further discussion
There is no-one anywhere in the world at any stage who is any bigger or any better than this football club.

Kenny Dalglish 1/2/2011

REST IN PEACE PHIL, YOU WILL NEVER BE FORGOTTEN.
User avatar
Ciggy
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 26826
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 2:36 pm

Postby bigmick » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:58 pm

As for "juristiction", someone wants to tell these c...s that we're talking about the high court of England here. The premier court of justice in the premier fecking country in the World, the building it's in is older than their fecking state government house in all probability. It's probably the same court where slavery was abolished, where women were given the vote etc etc.

Feck em off. They've got no "juristiction", not in law, not in natural justice, not in anyway shape or form. The reason is not only do they not have any right whatsoever on their side, but they are also a pair of c...s

English law takes a dim view of c...s, from wherever they come.
"se e in una bottigla ed e bianco, e latte".
User avatar
bigmick
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 12166
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:19 pm
Location: Wimbledon, London.

Postby tubby » Wed Oct 13, 2010 11:00 pm

Was just on 5live, the court date in Texas is October 26th or around then. Doesn't sound good. Why would he drag it on all the way there for the sake of it? He must have a trump card up his sleeve.
My new blog for my upcoming holiday.

http://kunstevie.wordpress.com/
User avatar
tubby
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 22442
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:05 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 43 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e