Liverpool FC Forum

roberto green wrote:

lakes10 wrote:the feeling in the City (london) is the club need a good run of good results to be able to get the right bidder, most feel theres too much work to be done at the club and thats also true of the new ground, new plans are now needed for the ground and thats just going to add to the cost of trying to make money out of the club, they feel that it could be upto 7 years before good profit can be made from it.

so its easy to see why some are staying clear of the club.


how would you all feel if we did get a new owner but they said " we are not looking to build a new ground but will look at it again in 5 years, we are going to bild a winning team first"

Don't agree there Lakes. Man city weren't exactly great when they got took over and neither were Chelsea and they haven't got the name and pedigree like a Global renowned name like Liverpool F.C.

The only reason we are not taken over yet is because we have 2 greedy b@stards who think they can get FAR more for the club than what it's worth.

lakes10 wrote:

roberto green wrote:

lakes10 wrote:the feeling in the City (london) is the club need a good run of good results to be able to get the right bidder, most feel theres too much work to be done at the club and thats also true of the new ground, new plans are now needed for the ground and thats just going to add to the cost of trying to make money out of the club, they feel that it could be upto 7 years before good profit can be made from it.

so its easy to see why some are staying clear of the club.


how would you all feel if we did get a new owner but they said " we are not looking to build a new ground but will look at it again in 5 years, we are going to bild a winning team first"

Don't agree there Lakes. Man city weren't exactly great when they got took over and neither were Chelsea and they haven't got the name and pedigree like a Global renowned name like Liverpool F.C.

The only reason we are not taken over yet is because we have 2 greedy b@stards who think they can get FAR more for the club than what it's worth.

not the same mate, they already had a nice new ground, the new owner only had to buy the team, we are not the same.

Ok city but Chelsea capacity still isn't great though.

roberto green wrote:

lakes10 wrote:the feeling in the City (london) is the club need a good run of good results to be able to get the right bidder, most feel theres too much work to be done at the club and thats also true of the new ground, new plans are now needed for the ground and thats just going to add to the cost of trying to make money out of the club, they feel that it could be upto 7 years before good profit can be made from it.

so its easy to see why some are staying clear of the club.


how would you all feel if we did get a new owner but they said " we are not looking to build a new ground but will look at it again in 5 years, we are going to bild a winning team first"

Don't agree there Lakes. Man city weren't exactly great when they got took over and neither were Chelsea and they haven't got the name and pedigree like a Global renowned name like Liverpool F.C.

The only reason we are not taken over yet is because we have 2 greedy b@stards who think they can get FAR more for the club than what it's worth.

lakes10 wrote:good bit on the radio today, it said that G&H have no power left at the club but are stopping the sale of the club due to them trying to cover money they spent on the club, the reporter then said that he has not been able to find any money they G&H have spent on the club that has not come out of a loan in the clubs name.

he also said that work is going ahead to sell the club and the club are not willing to let G&H bring in a 3rd party to cover the debts.

yes it was on talkshit but the guy was from ML that was talking.

bunglemark2 wrote:Why does that sound suspiciously like the ramblings of one of your "mates" in the know ?

ethanr wrote:

roberto green wrote:

lakes10 wrote:the feeling in the City (london) is the club need a good run of good results to be able to get the right bidder, most feel theres too much work to be done at the club and thats also true of the new ground, new plans are now needed for the ground and thats just going to add to the cost of trying to make money out of the club, they feel that it could be upto 7 years before good profit can be made from it.

so its easy to see why some are staying clear of the club.


how would you all feel if we did get a new owner but they said " we are not looking to build a new ground but will look at it again in 5 years, we are going to bild a winning team first"

Don't agree there Lakes. Man city weren't exactly great when they got took over and neither were Chelsea and they haven't got the name and pedigree like a Global renowned name like Liverpool F.C.

The only reason we are not taken over yet is because we have 2 greedy b@stards who think they can get FAR more for the club than what it's worth.

I was thinking something similar as you RG.

So imagine buying a club that has been consistently winning and looking like a good team to challenge for the title (or top 4 in our case) compared to a team who is measured on the same level, but not doing as well. You wouldn't want to pay that much more for a team that is just playing well at the moment when you could get a team that maybe looks like they are having trouble and need to be pointed in the right direction.

Look at Newcastle.  Mike Ashley is a dumb sh!t. He puts the club up for sale when they get relegated, when they are worth the least.  I'm surprised an investor didn't pick that up because, at that moment, that's the best buy possible.  That club still makes a lot of money and would go back up to the prem within 2 years, no doubt.  They get back into the prem and their value has just nearly doubled. 

Very few people look to buy clubs like city did.  They don't just want to splash cash out, they want a good investment.  So Liverpool struggling, with no stadium is a good investment because an investor knows that they can make a lot more money in building a new stadium and that it will be easy to please the fans, considering turning their bad fortune around should be simple.

Understand what I'm saying?  Don't look for a buyer that wants to blow hundreds of millions on the club, because that probably won't happen, it very very rarely does.  People buy these clubs as investments, which means they do plan on making money in the long run by properly growing the club.