Liverpool FC Forum

by **tubby** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:06 pm

SouthCoastShankly wrote:
Ciggy wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:Every time you comment on a topic that is even mildly controversial, the flood gates of emotion are opened and we hear drivel.

Ignore my drivel posts then simple isnt it?

I try but you post them as frequently as Lakes does.

And about as frequent as your posts always having a pop at someone else. Go get laid or something mate, all you seem to do is moan.

by **Emerald Red** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:07 pm

7_Kewell wrote:
Lee J wrote:Burn her at the stake!

i wouldn't mind if she posted anything POSITIVE but it's all doom and gloom, based on boll0cks.

Well, forgive me if I'm wrong, but all has not been well at the club for the past 3 years, now has it? It's hard to be optimistic when for the past few years we've all practically been bent over and fist f*cked, pardon my French, and expected to like it and ask for some more...which we could possibly get.

by **SouthCoastShankly** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:07 pm

red till i die!! wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:If the reports in the news are accurate it is neither here nor there what H&G want out a deal. If they are outvoted by Broughton, Purslow and Ayre then the deal is done.

true and this is how i always understood it to be.
i was also under the impression that any bid or bidders would have to go through broughton directly and no one else.
it was t&t who brought this deal to the table and you can be sure its the one that stands to benefit them the most.

these two cowboys put us in this position in the first place through greed,lies and debt so i refuse to believe any deal involving them will be good for us.

the board has 5 members,you are speculating saying that purslow and ayre will side with broughton as it might not be the case.

I guess so.

But I have to ask myself what is in it for Purslow and Ayre to side with H&G?

If a H&G favoured owner is successful they may keep their job's, but people in these positions move on every 3-4 years anyway. It all about a pay rise. Peter Kenyon's move to Chelsea from Man Utd is a prime example.

Also from what I have seen of Purslow and Ayre they show no allegiance to H&G. Yeah they back their bosses publicly when required but do so no more that is required to keep their jobs.

by **7_Kewell** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:07 pm

personally, i trust Broughton. He's a professional business guy and just what we need to sort this mess out. I couldn't give a flying f**k who he supports. The guy earns millions of pounds from what he does. Some people on here think he would risk all that to help Chelsea sign one player

:laugh:

by **SouthCoastShankly** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:08 pm

bavlondon wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:
Ciggy wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:Every time you comment on a topic that is even mildly controversial, the flood gates of emotion are opened and we hear drivel.

Ignore my drivel posts then simple isnt it?

I try but you post them as frequently as Lakes does.

And about as frequent as your posts always having a pop at someone else. Go get laid or something mate, all you seem to do is moan.

If that ain't the pot calling the kettle black I don't know what is.

by **Emerald Red** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:10 pm

I've just turned the TV on. Are SSN taking the f*ckin p*ss here? Why are they interviewing a Manc gobsh*te with a United shirt in the background talking about Liverpool? I'm going to look outside next and see cats and dogs riding eachother in the street.

by **7_Kewell** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:10 pm

bavlondon wrote:
7_Kewell wrote:
Ciggy wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:Does you whole life revolve around conspiracy theories?

In your world we probably never landed on the moon.

Its a fact that Broughton is a Chelsea season ticket holder, its also a fact that Keith Harris is a fanatic Man united fan leading the group for the Red Knights to buy United.

its not a conspiracy theory atall they are facts, if your comfortable about two of our biggest rivals making decisions at liverpool football club thats your perogative however Im not comfortable with it atall.

In my world we never landed on the moon

your another thats been at it for quite some time, I tell you what i wouldnt like to owe you BM or Bamaga man a pound you'd never let it drop.

our rivals are making decisions? what utter sh!te, as usual.

Not so long ago you said Torres and Gerrard were being sold...you also claimed that "woy" was a yes man and wouldn't do anything to improve the squad or stop players leaving.

How much sh!te can you spout?

Broughton is here to SELL OUR CLUB. Not SELL TORRES TO CHELSEA. The fact he (and Harris) support other teams is irelivant. This is business and they have a job to do.

Give it a rest will yer. Of course we will never know for sure but do you think Gerrard and Torres would have committed their future to the club if we were stuck with the yanks for the foreseable future?

I thought you were a journo too.

they've committed for our manager. Not rumours of a takeover deal, which they've both heard dozens of times before.

that's not the fashionable answer, but it's the true one. FACT

by **Ciggy** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:12 pm

Emerald Red wrote:I've just turned the TV on. Are SSN taking the f*ckin p*ss here? Why are they interviewing a Manc gobsh*te with a United shirt in the background talking about Liverpool? I'm going to look outside next and see cats and dogs riding eachother in the street.

Your being paranoid mate, all is well and good on the good ole ship of LFC. infact its great that a Chelsea fan is our chairman and a man U fan is behind another bid

I trust these two men to do the right thing for our club. :;):

by **bigmick** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:13 pm

Why don't people just use this thread for talking about potential takeovers? Leave talk of where people go on holiday, whether or not they like waltzers, and alsations, and whether or not someone else is "talking sh!te" and whether someone should be "burned at the stake and all that stuff aside.

Everyone wants a takeover, nobody knows feck all about the takeoverees. Everyone's got their fingers and toes crossed it works out, and everyone is entitled to an opinion, even if it is b0ll0cks.

I haven't got an opinion because I know absolutely feck all about the subject.Perhaps people should seriously ask themselves how much they actually KNOW about what's going on, and then just chill out a bit. None of us know, none of us even think we know, so whats the point in everyone falling out about it?

by **maguskwt** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:14 pm

Emerald Red wrote:I've just turned the TV on. Are SSN taking the f*ckin p*ss here? Why are they interviewing a Manc gobsh*te with a United shirt in the background talking about Liverpool? I'm going to look outside next and see cats and dogs riding eachother in the street.

I truly believe that that Keith Harris guy is taking the :censored:

.

by **tubby** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:14 pm

by **Scottbot** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:15 pm

jacdaniel wrote:Isn't purslow quite friendly with Hicks though?

When we get sold will Purslow remain at the club in any capacity?

I believe so, same goes for Ian Ayre. Hicks has spoken very highly of him a few times plus I think he was his appointment. In many ways Hicks and Gillette STILL are the board. To pretend different would be wishful thinking i'm afraid

by **Emerald Red** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:16 pm

Ciggy wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:I've just turned the TV on. Are SSN taking the f*ckin p*ss here? Why are they interviewing a Manc gobsh*te with a United shirt in the background talking about Liverpool? I'm going to look outside next and see cats and dogs riding eachother in the street.

Your being paranoid mate, all is well and good on the good ole ship of LFC. infact its great that a Chelsea fan is our chairman and a man U fan is behind another bid

I trust these two men to do the right thing for our club.

If it means we can get Gary Neville and Wazza on a loan, I'm sold.

by **In and Out** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:18 pm

SouthCoastShankly wrote:
Ciggy wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:Every time you comment on a topic that is even mildly controversial, the flood gates of emotion are opened and we hear drivel.

Ignore my drivel posts then simple isnt it?

I try but you post them as frequently as Lakes does.

by **SouthCoastShankly** » Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:19 pm

7_Kewell wrote:personally, i trust Broughton. He's a professional business guy and just what we need to sort this mess out. I couldn't give a flying f**k who he supports. The guy earns millions of pounds from what he does. Some people on here think he would risk all that to help Chelsea sign one player

Exactly.

It would be different if he was a Chelsea board member, but in reality he is just a fan.

Wolves fans have an apparent Liverpool supporter at the helm in Steve Morgan. I assume that when we beat them it is due to some conspiracy from their owner who happens to be a Liverpool supporter.

Muppets

Liverpool FC Forum

TAKEOVER COMPLETE - H & G Finally Jibbed!

Who is online