Liverpool FC Forum

by **dawson99** » Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:36 pm

Ciggy wrote:
LFC2007 wrote:As if some of the plebs on here would waive the compensation entitled to them. No, if they did a questionable job, they'd delude themselves silly into believing they did an absolutely boss job and would readily accept a payoff without a smidgeon of guilt.

Im dissapionted that rafa didnt take them to the cleaners and held out for the full 16 million, I know the reason why he didnt is because he would have been on gardening leave for the next 5 or so years and theres noway he would want that, being so obssessed with football.

cigs, that woulda been bad for the club!

by **Ciggy** » Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:38 pm

dawson99 wrote:cigs, that woulda been bad for the club!

It may have been but he was entitled to it, be grateful he accepted the 6 million and didnt want 16 instead.

Houllier got paid off 10 million I dont ever remember him getting any abuse over it.

by **dawson99** » Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:39 pm

Ciggy wrote:
dawson99 wrote:cigs, that woulda been bad for the club!

It may have been but he was entitled to it, be grateful he accepted the 6 million and didnt want 16 instead.

Houllier got paid off 10 million I dont ever remember him getting any abuse over it.

LOL, do you support Liverpool or Rafa?

by **neil** » Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:42 pm

I can look after meself lash.

Ciggy I have plenty of optimism thanks.

So that's my twopenneth on the matter, he's at inter now so that's one for their forum.

by **Ciggy** » Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:46 pm

dawson99 wrote:LOL, do you support Liverpool or Rafa?

So lets get this straight you have a contract at your place of work and if they sack you, you would be entitled to a certain amount of money, they sack you so you say oh its ok just leave my pay off I dont want nothing or just give me a third of what I am entitled to..............

Theres noway anyone would do that, its got nothing to do with me being a rafa or liverpool fan.

by **neil** » Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:48 pm

LFC2007 wrote:As if some of the plebs on here...

Good one, Internet badass

by **LFC2007** » Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:50 pm

neil wrote:
LFC2007 wrote:As if some of the plebs on here...

Good one, Internet badass

by **Reg** » Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:58 pm

Can we please get this thread back on subject - 'Twit and Twát, their rape of our club and the need to get rid of them'.

EVERYTHING else is off topic and covered in other threads.

Ta

by **dawson99** » Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:02 pm

Ciggy wrote:
dawson99 wrote:LOL, do you support Liverpool or Rafa?

So lets get this straight you have a contract at your place of work and if they sack you, you would be entitled to a certain amount of money, they sack you so you say oh its ok just leave my pay off I dont want nothing or just give me a third of what I am entitled to..............

Theres noway anyone would do that, its got nothing to do with me being a rafa or liverpool fan.

no, the point is you are gutted that Rafa didn't get another 10 million from the Liverpool lowly funds!!!

6 million is more than fair, he'll have another job by Thursday anyways

by **shabelle50** » Mon Jun 07, 2010 9:35 pm

It's just a bit convenient that LFCTV is off air because the channel is "moving studio" meaning that hour after hour it's repeats of old clips and shows that have been shown before. I'm sure H&G with their henchman Purslow and Broughton are pretty pleased that the likes of Brian Reade and Aldo aren't ripping into them tonight on the phone in show. If I didn't know better I'd say they organised the studio move to coincide with Rafa's departure.

by **Benny The Noon** » Mon Jun 07, 2010 9:41 pm

The ones that wanted Rafa out have got their wish now let's hope we don't reap the awful consequences that could well happen because of it . I also see they are just not happy with him being treated so disgracefully by the two parasites and their two hatchetmen - one a live long Chelsea fan the other a backstabbing twa.t- they want to keep sticking the knife into him with the insults . One quick question for you - if he was so bad why the hell have inter snapped him straight up ?! At least it seems one owner knows a quality football manager when they see one unlike the pair of utter Fu.ckwits who claim to run our club . Get these f.ucking disgusting yank lowlife single cell parasites out of our club and quick before they destroy it further

by **supersub** » Mon Jun 07, 2010 9:48 pm

Nothing would surprise me about G & H......sometimes I think they have planted pretend fans on this forum to sing their praises and pour scorn on anything connected to Benitez...even his derisory pay off

by **Benny The Noon** » Mon Jun 07, 2010 9:55 pm

What next ?! When Klinsmann leads us to the bottom half of the table will Rafa get the blame still , will Rafa be blamed for Torres , Gerrard and Masher being sold to fund debts ?

by **NANNY RED** » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:21 pm

JUST F.UCK OFF AND DIE YOU GREEDY :censored:

Hicks scuppers two 'perfect fit' offers for Liverpool

Published 23:00 07/06/10 By David Maddock

Tom Hicks has scuppered at least two 'perfect fit' offers for Liverpool, because of his unreasonable asking price.

Sources at Barclays Capital, who have been charged with selling the Anfield club, have revealed their private frustration at the American owner's unyielding stance in negotiations.

An insider revealed to the Mirror that they have found "exciting investors" they believe have the money and standing to buy the club and take them forward, despite the massive debts run up by Hicks and Gillett. One of the offers has come from the Middle East, and another is a consortium led by a prominent American businessman.

But, so far, the staggering valuation of almost £800million placed on Liverpool by their Texan owner has proved an insurmountable stumbling block, because potential buyers are refusing to be held to ransom.

A source working on the sale of the Merseyside club for BarCap revealed privately: "We have found more than one really good fit investors, who have the wealth not to worry about a few hundred million quid.

"But they will not be held to ransom, because they know the asking price is unreasonable, and they simply don't want to be taken for a ride, no matter how rich they are."

There is a growing fear amongst those close to the deal that Hicks' business empire has been suffering in the global economic crisis, and that is motivating his hard-line stance over a price.

But BarCap are losing patience with the valuation, even though they accept that the sales document put together by the club makes impressive reading.

A source for the investment firm suggested that the figures 'add up', even before a new stadium is being built, but that has persuaded Hicks to hold out for more money.

His partner, George Gillett, is willing to accept a more reasonable offer to enable him to get out of the club, and escape the angry campaign against them from disenchanted supporters.

Hicks though, remains the massive obstacle to the deal, and that could persuade the club's lenders the Royal Bank of Scotland, to step in and take action.

The RBS have given an undertaking to extend their current loan of £237million to the Americans for another 12 months.

But worried by reports from BarCap about the difficulty in finding the right price to tempt a buyer, the bank are considering making an ultimatum to Hicks and Gillett.

The RBS are increasingly frustrated at the process, and sources close to the deal are suggesting there is a chance they will offer the Americans an ultimatum of finding a buyer "within months", or they will pull the plug on the loans.

:angry:

by **The Good Yank** » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:21 pm

Benny The Noon wrote:What next ?! When Klinsmann leads us to the bottom half of the table will Rafa get the blame still , will Rafa be blamed for Torres , Gerrard and Masher being sold to fund debts ?

This from the king of the campaign against Hyperbole and speculation? Surely Not.

Liverpool FC Forum

TAKEOVER COMPLETE - H & G Finally Jibbed!

Who is online