TAKEOVER COMPLETE - H & G Finally Jibbed!

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby triggerred38 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 12:47 am

LegBarnes wrote:
lakes10 wrote:
metalhead wrote:
triggerred38 wrote:
hello_red wrote:
Rush Job wrote:The sheikh is a LFC fan and has stated more than once that he`s only interested in buying us, add to that he`s a man who always gets what he wants and i dont think we`ve got anything to worry about.
Papers are running out of "who`s next" storys so now there just making them up.
The fact that neither side (H&G and DIC) are talking to the press has to be a good thing, its shows somethings going on IMO, i mean come on as soon as they said that the stadium plans are on hold they might as well of said we`re skint, there is no chance the banks are going to keep lending them more and more money every season and their not stupid enough to watch there "investment" shrink, which it will if they stick around.

Agreed mate, the banks will look at the lack of stadium and think we cant lend them money, the pairs position is unsustainable now even if they are stubbirn about selling, as money talks and they will be forced to sell on by the banks.

DIC look like they have a proper plan in place, even if they sell on in 7-8 years which they said they will do atleast we will be in a position to sustain ourselves financially with a new stadium and hopefully new found success!

I am sorry to be the vessell of doom, however, UNTIL Hicks & Gillette fail to meet interest/capital repayments then there is not much chance of the banks pulling the plug.

Think about it it we're LFC and there is serious money coming into the Premier league.

Why would RBS pull the plug when they are making so much money and there outlay is cast iron guaranteed safe....

As much as my heart tells me we will be ok my head says different.

Moores & Parry rot in hell for what you have done to our fabulous club.

I'm writing this with tears in my eyes as I for one hate to see what those two fat, stupid, Yankee Tw@ts have allowed to happen over the last 12 months.

:no

Thats the sad truth

very happy to say you are wrong

RBS need to show the Hicks can make money to be able to give him more if not this come under bad lending

As it stands right now Hicks is only just making money on some of his outlays.

Hicks would been seen as to high risk to give any more loans by most banks.

Dont forget that the world is in a credit crunch due to too much bad lending.

Agreed Banks don't look at buisnesses making repayments they look at 3-5 year forcasts it's different to personal loans they need to know if they can reply this loan of for the full term not month to month.

This is why they are having reviews every 6-12 months bcos the bank are lets say cr.aping there selfs last thing they want is to shut down a club like liverpool to repay the loan as it will only bring them bad press , which is in turn bad for them buisness wise.

I can see them taking hicks to court soon if he A. doesn't get the backing to keep loan active or B. sells to some one who can keep the debts floating or pay them off all together.


Way buisness loans work is say I take a club loan in normal market of 100 million.

100 million over 15 years at 12% rate

Now in normal market you be looking at a 5 year forecast of about inflation of 5-7%.

But atm with a credit crunch the inflation is around 1-2% so any loan taken before this is going to be harder to pay of due to profits are going to fall.

So a club making a turnover of 200 million would normaly make a profit of say 50 million but atm that profit might be close to 10-15 million or maybe if market gets worse could even be a lose of 10-20 million.

So this is why banks are stressing they think where is the money comming from.

I know for fact Hicks don't have assists to surport his loans so he has to sell he just has to unless he gets another 500 mil in backing.

without sounding like a know it all and if I am wrong and I hope to god I am then someone please tell me.

regardless of the size of this loan LFC are one of the most celebrated clubs in the world  and.................... there are billionaires buying clubs less prestigous than ours and talking about spending 135 mill on one player.......................

RBS have got enough common sense to know that should morecombe and wise not make the interest payments then someone would step in and cover the loan(make no mistake their collaterol is a safer bet than my wife telling me its only a game next time we lose......)

The media's coverage of the credit crunch does not take into account that banks will do anything to make money still and they will mainly squeeze existing customers (I know I work for one!!

Takeover?  its not happening and we have to deal with it and just watch while they f...ck up our club.

Fat, ugly, Texan tw@t & Forrest Gimp     f...k off
:veryangry
Dave J
triggerred38
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:21 pm
Location: Kenilworth

Postby Reg » Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:14 am

Lets think about the purchase potential of car manufacturers for a moment.

Who would buy Ford, Peugeot or Renault ? No one. Cheap cr@p.

Volvo? No one. A confused brand.

Jaguar, well yes it has its attractions and potential as a company but needs big bucks and lots of development.

Rolls Royce and Bentley.... now then, no matter how long they've been sleeping, they're brands worth investing in.

Over and out.
User avatar
Reg
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13966
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 12:24 am
Location: Singapore

Postby GOAT_2.0 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 8:24 am

We're not a car.

:rasp  :D
Image Image
User avatar
GOAT_2.0
 
Posts: 694
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 12:28 pm

Postby Ciggy » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:16 am

Twit & tw@t will be cutting the costs by getting rid of expensive cars that are used by the club, Audi are not best pleased about it.

Also there is going to be a cull on the players those not deemed good enough and those that will not make the grade from the youth squad will be off the wage bill.
There is no-one anywhere in the world at any stage who is any bigger or any better than this football club.

Kenny Dalglish 1/2/2011

REST IN PEACE PHIL, YOU WILL NEVER BE FORGOTTEN.
User avatar
Ciggy
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 26826
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 2:36 pm

Postby figgis » Tue Sep 09, 2008 12:48 pm

Ford own Volvo and are the most sucessfull car company in the world. if you could look at the fc as a car it would be ford. a club of the people and the most sucessful ever. man city are at the same crossroads that we are at the difference is they know which way they are going. i would say i would put my money into liverpool any day of the week over man city or chelski its the most sucessful club in britain if not the world. its not a case of if but when it happens and when it does the reds will rule again.
figgis
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 10:31 pm

Postby Reg » Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:27 pm

FIGGIS    "Ford own Volvo and are the most sucessfull car company in the world. if you could look at the fc as a car it would be ford."


I hope not.........


Ford Motor Co. Loses Billions In Second Quarter   24th July 2008

DEARBORN, MI (AP) -- Ford Motor Co. posted the worst quarterly performance in its history Thursday, losing $8.67 billion in the second quarter. Second-quarter revenue was $38.6 billion, down $5.6 billion from the year-ago period. Analysts expected $34.6 billion.
©2008 Associated Press.
User avatar
Reg
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13966
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 12:24 am
Location: Singapore

Postby Number 9 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:29 pm

Reg wrote:FIGGIS    "Ford own Volvo and are the most sucessfull car company in the world. if you could look at the fc as a car it would be ford."


I hope not.........


Ford Motor Co. Loses Billions In Second Quarter   24th July 2008

DEARBORN, MI (AP) -- Ford Motor Co. posted the worst quarterly performance in its history Thursday, losing $8.67 billion in the second quarter. Second-quarter revenue was $38.6 billion, down $5.6 billion from the year-ago period. Analysts expected $34.6 billion.
©2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, rewritten, or redistributed.

Good! :nod
Image
User avatar
Number 9
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7601
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:19 pm
Location: South Belfast

Postby heimdall » Tue Sep 09, 2008 4:06 pm

Number 9 wrote:
Reg wrote:FIGGIS    "Ford own Volvo and are the most sucessfull car company in the world. if you could look at the fc as a car it would be ford."


I hope not.........


Ford Motor Co. Loses Billions In Second Quarter   24th July 2008

DEARBORN, MI (AP) -- Ford Motor Co. posted the worst quarterly performance in its history Thursday, losing $8.67 billion in the second quarter. Second-quarter revenue was $38.6 billion, down $5.6 billion from the year-ago period. Analysts expected $34.6 billion.
©2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, rewritten, or redistributed.

Good! :nod

and down with all the fast food you no doubt enjoy, all films, music etc etc. Grow up mate, just becuase we don't like our owners doesn't mean you need to hate everything American! :veryangry
Unless you meant it in jest in which case  :D
User avatar
heimdall
 
Posts: 4971
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 1:51 pm
Location: London

Postby GYBS » Tue Sep 09, 2008 4:26 pm

whats wrong with not liking anything american ? hate fast food ie mac :censored: , music is :censored: and films not much cop as well .
Image
User avatar
GYBS
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8647
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:42 pm
Location: Oxford

Postby Effes » Tue Sep 09, 2008 4:52 pm

GYBS wrote:whats wrong with not liking anything american ? ............ films are not much cop as well .

:laugh:

Gotta laugh at that
Image
Matt McQueen - Liverpool 1892-1928.
Only professional to - play in goal (41 appearances), Defence, Midfield, Striker, and later be Director and then to be Manager (winning a Championship) - at one club
User avatar
Effes
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 4282
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:45 pm
Location: Garston

Postby SupitsJonF » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:35 pm

GYBS wrote:whats wrong with not liking anything american ? hate fast food ie mac  and films not much cop as well .

You fat as.ses have fast food as well, recent statistics show your right next to us on the fat a.ss line, so shutup and eat a burger  :D

Apparently Australia is now the fattest though
SupitsJonF
 
Posts: 2798
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:35 am
Location: USA: NJ

Postby metalhead » Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:04 pm

Americans are cool  :)
ImageImageImage
User avatar
metalhead
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 17476
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: Milan, Italy

Postby JoeTerp » Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:06 pm

metalhead wrote:Americans are cool  :)

you know it  :wwww
Image
User avatar
JoeTerp
 
Posts: 5191
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:38 am
Location: Boston, MA

Postby JoeTerp » Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:09 pm

oh and Ford sucks, Chevy rules.
Image
User avatar
JoeTerp
 
Posts: 5191
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:38 am
Location: Boston, MA

Postby Bad Bob » Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:13 pm

SupitsJonF wrote:
GYBS wrote:whats wrong with not liking anything american ? hate fast food ie mac  and films not much cop as well .

You fat as.ses have fast food as well, recent statistics show your right next to us on the fat a.ss line, so shutup and eat a burger  :D

Apparently Australia is now the fattest though

They invented fast food, mate, and don't let em tell you any different. :nod 

The Scots, especially, excel at fast food.  Check out this artery clogging masterpiece:

Image

Batter up for kebab that's hit health snag
By Annabel Crabb
September 12, 2004

Other cities around the world may be embracing the gastronomic non-sequiturs of a new diet millennium McDonald's salads, low-fat oven chips and skinny ice cream.

But Glasgow the city of the deep fat fryer is still hurtling determinedly in the other direction.

An enterprising chippie in Glasgow's tourist district has just invented what is believed to be the most fattening, artery-encrustulating dish in Scotland.

Weighing in at 1000 calories, the Stonner Kebab consists of a pork sausage, lovingly wrapped in shaved kebab meat, double-dipped in thick batter and deepfried.

In a nod to the traditionalists, it's then served on a pile of chips.

The Stonner boasts 46 grams of fat and is officially twice as bad for you as a full McDonald's burger meal.

Its inventors at the Ruby Fish Bar, Sati Sangha and Campbell McArthur, have already made an attempt at liability mitigation.

"Due to the severe health dangers of this fine dish, we can only supply one Stonner supper, per customer, per week," reads a prudent sign in the shop's window.
Advertisement Advertisement

The dish was invented by Mr McArthur one night after consuming a quantity of beer. He has since commenced proceedings to secure a patent, and is considering expanding the process to embrace haggis and black puddings.

The world already has Scotland to thank for delicacies such as the deep-fried Mars Bar, and deep-fried black pudding is a big seller in Glasgow. Mr McArthur is cheerfully unaffected by the criticism from Scottish health professionals, who are acutely aware of Glasgow's status as the United Kingdom's cardiac arrest capital.

"We'll probably have to invent deep-fried cigarettes next," Mr McArthur said.

"At the end of the day, Scottish people are just good people who like good food."

Mr McArthur insists that the dish's name comes from a combination of the words "sausage"

and "doner", but "Stonner" is also Glasgow slang for a sensitive part of the male anatomy.

Slender visiting Australian Jeremy Storer, 32, accepted the Stonner challenge and found it quite amouthful. "It's a winner!" he declared, adding that it would probably be enhanced by seven pints of beer.

Meanwhile, the inventors claim to have improved health and fitness. Five weeks of cooking hundreds of Stonners in a fish and chips shop during summer have caused Mr Sangha and Mr McArthur to lose 10 and six kilograms respectively.

:D
Last edited by Bad Bob on Tue Sep 09, 2008 8:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Bad Bob
LFC Guru Member
 
Posts: 11269
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:03 pm
Location: Canada

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 165 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e