NANNY RED wrote:HE LOOKS LIKE HES GONNA BE DEAD SOON

badgermit wrote:More importantly - the current Red Sox ownership took an old, dilapidated dump of a ballpark - Fenway park, built in 1912 - and turned it into a place that people actually want to go to now. They made gradual changes, keeping with the theme of the oldest ballpark in America...all very tastefully done. And they gradually increased the seating capacity from ~32K people to almost 40K people. The downside of this is that they are on average the most expensive tickets in baseball. But they do this because (1) demand and (2) they need to charge more in order to sign the best players.
Fenway has been sold out for something like 8 years....and that means 81 home games per year. That is a lot of sellouts.
These guys are good....they find creative ways to make money, they stay true to community and the original purpose of the team. They put smart people in positions for them to excel. They think outside the box - building excellence throughout the organization to try to sign younger players and develop them as a way to competing with the giants more effectively. They put ruthless business people in positions where they are needed. And they know that only winning will bring success and money. Not only that, but these guys are FANS.
my $.02 - speaking as a huge Red Sox fan and lifelong Boston resident - and someone who has followed Liverpool for years now (I chose Liverpool as the team most like the Sox and the team that I would support when we first started getting English football over here). This is the best thing for Liverpool, I just know it.
Getting money/free-of-debt is one thing. But getting management and an organization that knows what it is doing is something MUCH MUCH more valuable.
Scottbot wrote:I didn't catch all of the slugs interview on SSN but it struck me that the interviewer was completely sh...i...te and was asking all the wrong questions, did he even ask about the lies about not putting debt on the club? About "not being like the united buyout"? That's what all this is truely about you stupid fat f...u...c...k. Is he really that clueless or just a great actor!?
I hope he's got a stomach ulcer to go with the empty bank account and the wounded ego.
Got me ticket for Blackburn next weekend!!! Wake up Anfield we finally got sumthing to sing about!!!!!!
jono wrote:red till i die!! wrote:i remember reading it was something like 162ish mil but recouped back 153ish in sales.there net spend was 3.5mil a season since they came.
pretty sure it was this thread i read it in a while back.
would love the link
Scottbot wrote:Am looking forward to directing some of that internet terrorism in the direction of the law firm set to represent the two slugs in court. They're talking about a war of attrition, well lets see how well the rest of their business operates with 10,000 emails hitting their servers every week.
fivecups wrote:Scottbot wrote:Am looking forward to directing some of that internet terrorism in the direction of the law firm set to represent the two slugs in court. They're talking about a war of attrition, well lets see how well the rest of their business operates with 10,000 emails hitting their servers every week.
We can also target his business partners, lenders until he leaves us the f'uck alone. We know the banks hate this sort of attack so we keep it going until he hates the thought and sight of us.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 126 guests