by Owzat » Sun Dec 20, 2009 10:08 am
This season's start is worse than in 04/05 and would be our worst ever 19 game start to a Premiership season if we lose the next game. While it might not quite be as bad as Houllier's eleven league games without a win, it is still too many defeats and not enough wins.
I think the problem is similar to one Houllier created for himself, getting carried away with his spending policy and buying expensive and ineffective c-r-a-p. Rafa has tried to fix problems at LM, LB and RM, but created a lack of options elsewhere and taken out the V12 engine of the team and replaced it with a wind-up Brazilian. We don't have two quality CFs to rub together, while the mancs may have lost 0-3 at craven cottage where we only lost 0-2, their striking options were Owen, Berbatov and Rooney. When our current system was working, it was great. But Rafa has no plan B and plan A depended very much on the likes of Kuyt, Torres, Benayoun, Gerrard and ALONSO.
Even if the owners gave Rafa £50m to spend in the January transfer window, I'd be more worried what he'd waste it on than looking forward to reinforcements. We'd probably go and buy Kenwyn Jones for £15m, or Adam Johnson for £17m, or pay over the odds for someone that would not make a big impact on the team. I think Citeh made a wise move yesterday, they assessed where Hughes was going and concluded it was nowhere fast. I know he got a lot of sympathy, especially from our ex-players on MOTD, but it isn't just a case of giving someone 'time'. He bought lots of strikers, but couldn't organise the defence so that they were scoring two goals and not winning. We've won 80% of the league games we've scored twice in :
2+ league goals 09/10
Liverpool : P10 W8 D2 L0 (Won 80.00%)
Man City : P11 W6 D4 L1 (Won 54.55%)
To lose one and draw three games where you've scored two or more goals is not clever. It would have been unbeaten but for the dubious stoppage time in their derby, but to draw near half wouldn't have been a lot better. The owners made a bold decision, maybe they can afford it, but they also know that they may well be better off financially in the short and long term. While Mancini has been criticised by some pundits for "lacking experience", he has won Italian cups with Fiorentina and Lazio, and two Italian cups and three Serie A titles with Inter Milan. Hardly "lacking experience", it's not as if any money argument will hold any water and Mancini should have enough respect within the game to land better CBs than Lescott and Toure for silly money. I think I'd rather have a man in charge who can go back to former club Inter than one who can dip into the Blackburn squad. Hughes was living proof that exposes one myth for what it is - a myth. That a manager who does well on limited resources at one club won't necessarly succeed at a big(ger) club with unlimited resources. Hughes proved the fatal flaw in the logic in not knowing the market, ending up paying over the odds for good to ordinary players. It just about got him a win yesterday over Sunderland, although the decision to get rid was clearly made at least a few days ago if not been in the pipeline for some time
Never buy from PC World, product quality is poor and their 'customer service' is even poorer