alwayslfc » Mon Dec 17, 2012 4:09 am wrote:Further on FSG, goal.com has just revealed that A.Wenger will be given 50 million pounds to reinforce his side to challenge for top 4 finish in January. Now is FSG going to do that with Brendan? From what I can see, I don't think so. They give me the opinion they are stingy b#stards because I have no doubt they can easily fund Brendan with that kind of money if they want to and they are stupid football owners as well. They believe a lot in investing in the youth and moving up them up the ranks instead of spending heavily. Well, the Raheem Sterling contract which up to now he hasn't signed yet, looks like will blow up in front of their face if Sterling doesn't want to sign but instead go to City or manure. Again, all thanks to FSG.
Like I said before, don't think the most of the 120 million that Kenny wasted on average players were from them. Most of that sum came from the sale of outgoing players, particularly from the sale of Torres. The net spend from them was not more than 50 million that summer.
To me, FSG so far has done nothing to be worthy Liverpool owners. But I still hope they will prove me wrong in the long run.
So they have had 3 transfer windows and spent over 150 million which works out to an average of 50 million per window and you have seen no evidence they will back Rodgers. The fact you go to Goal.com for your sources is questionable.
If they laid out 20 million on one player or another 50 million on the quality of Downing and Carroll i know which one id be more happy with. Arsenals supposed 50 million will NOT strengthen them there not going to buy Ronaldo or Messi or Falcao. Could blow 10+ million on Huntelaar but WILL lose Walcott.