Liverpool FC Forum

The Manhattan Project wrote:"Well I'd like to welcome y'all to Liverpool Reds, we are pretty much equal partners. I'm looking forward to working with you"



"Equal?"



"Yeah, I mean y'all own 49% percent of the Reds right?"



"No, we own 100% percent!"



"That was NEVER a condition of our agreement!!!"



"I am altering the deal....pray I don't alter it any further!!!!"



"But....but y'all....can't do that!!!"



"Take him away!!!!"



"Yes my lord!!!"



"No...wait...stop please...no..no....NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!"




-distant gunshots are heard-

classic    

The Manhattan Project wrote:One day, Hicks will have an opinion on something that doesn't make it into the newspapers or onto a website.

I swear, according to my sources, The Mirror reported that Tom Hicks announced that boiled carrots were better than raw carrots.

But that's crazy I have a letter from him where he clearly tells me that he thinks raw carrots are the best, the lying &#%&!!!! 

The Manhattan Project wrote:

zarababe wrote:I want DIC

Tee hee


And DIC wants YOU!!!!

manhatten u bast.ard u beat me too it 

RedBlood wrote:

The Manhattan Project wrote:

zarababe wrote:I want DIC

Tee hee


And DIC wants YOU!!!!

manhatten u bast.ard u beat me too it 

Dundalk wrote:From Sky Sports

Liverpool co-owner Tom Hicks launched a scathing attack on his potential future partners, the Dubai based consortium, DIC.

Although the deal is said to still be on course, Hicks has reacted furiously after alleging DIC's lead negotiator Amanda Staveley had leaked private letters, concering the takeover, to the press.


"If she thinks that is an appropriate way to acquire a stake in Liverpool FC, she had better think again," Hicks said in a statement to the Associated Press.

"Amanda Staveley, who has a reputation for being pretty smart, she should know better than to publicly put words in my mouth, particularly words that she knows or should know perfectly well aren't true.

"She should also know better than to release actual copies of my private correspondence to the press."

Hicks also insinuated that DIC are not the only investors who could come in to Anfield and take over the investment of his partner George Gillett Jnr, who is looking to sell his 50 per cent stake in the club.

Hicks can block Gillett from selling because of a pre-emption agreement that says one partner cannot sell his stake without the other's approval.

Despite the public anger expressed by Hicks - DIC are said to be still on course to take Gillet's substantial stake in Liverpool.

Here we go again just when i thought it was safe he twists the knife in again