Liverpool FC Forum

by **europian-kings** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:33 pm

andy_g wrote:
dawson99 wrote:Hicks is a c*nt

excellent point, mate. lets hope grabbo mentions that one.

Im sure it would have been his very first words of his very first sentence...straight to the point

by **europian-kings** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:34 pm

3:33 - Awaiting judges verdict apparently...

by **lakes10** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:36 pm

one report has posted on twit that that is seem "Hicks is going to get way with slippery behaviour"
Lord Grabiner set to start winding up.

the case not the club...better make that clear lol

by **GRAHAM01** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:36 pm

europian-kings wrote:3:33 - Awaiting judges verdict apparently...

if that's true?? here we go..

by **Redman in wales** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:37 pm

3.28pm: Lord Grabiner says correspondence between board and owner prove that H&G knew of the meeting on 5 October and instead they simply refused to turn up and not, as their QC says, that they were excluded from it by the "sub-committee".

Lord Grabiner describes the owners as "slippery" because they wanted a one week adjournment to that meeting knowing full well that NESV's deadline for their offer to expired on 5 October.

Also, Hicks had a lawyer, Bruce Toth, listening to that meeting via telephone as an observer, destroying their argument that they were excluded from that crucial meeting.

--

is that where the 5 october deadline may have come from???

by **europian-kings** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:37 pm

3:37 Lord Grabiner says "slippery" owners simply refused to turn up to meeting on October 5th, knowing that NESV's offer to buy the club would expire then. Plus, Hicks had a lawyer listening on the phone of that meeting. HA!

by **tubby** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:38 pm

* Sport
* Football
* Liverpool

Badge Sport Blog

* Next
* Previous
* Blog home

Liverpool FC sale: High court hearing live coverage

• Peter Lim makes £320m takeover bid
• Royal Bank of Scotland v Tom Hicks and George Gillett
• Mr Justice Floyd decision may lead to sale to John W Henry
• The Gallery: Liverpool's woes (your view!)
• Video: supporters outside the high court
• Please comment below or email Steve Busfield or on Twitter

* Reddit
* Buzz up
* Share on facebook (514)
*
*
Comments (365)

George Gillett and Tom Hicks promised to build a new stadium upon taking over at Liverpool George Gillett and Tom Hicks. Photograph: Peter Byrne/PA Archive/PA Photos

3.28pm: Lord Grabiner says correspondence between board and owner prove that H&G knew of the meeting on 5 October and instead they simply refused to turn up and not, as their QC says, that they were excluded from it by the "sub-committee".

Lord Grabiner describes the owners as "slippery" because they wanted a one week adjournment to that meeting knowing full well that NESV's deadline for their offer to expired on 5 October.

Also, Hicks had a lawyer, Bruce Toth, listening to that meeting via telephone as an observer, destroying their argument that they were excluded from that crucial meeting.

by **Anfield rapper** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:38 pm

Also, Hicks had a lawyer, Bruce Toth, listening to that meeting via telephone as an observer, destroying their argument that they were excluded from that crucial meeting.

GAME OVER!

by **lakes10** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:40 pm

Redman in wales wrote:3.28pm: Lord Grabiner says correspondence between board and owner prove that H&G knew of the meeting on 5 October and instead they simply refused to turn up and not, as their QC says, that they were excluded from it by the "sub-committee".

Lord Grabiner describes the owners as "slippery" because they wanted a one week adjournment to that meeting knowing full well that NESV's deadline for their offer to expired on 5 October.

Also, Hicks had a lawyer, Bruce Toth, listening to that meeting via telephone as an observer, destroying their argument that they were excluded from that crucial meeting.

--

is that where the 5 october deadline may have come from???

yer must be. looking over the news forum most reporters say they can not call it.

by **tubby** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:40 pm

Is fkn right! Their whole argument is basically they were left out but QC has just thrown that out the window. Sneaky fk had someone listening in.

by **OneHotRed** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:40 pm

Have they SERIOUSLY tried to win this case with the :censored:

they are spouting, they are acting like little kids, bloody idiotic w4nkers

by **metalhead** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:40 pm

Anfield rapper wrote:Also, Hicks had a lawyer, Bruce Toth, listening to that meeting via telephone as an observer, destroying their argument that they were excluded from that crucial meeting.

GAME OVER!

Killer Blow :nod

by **Steve Crooks** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:42 pm

lakes10 wrote:
Redman in wales wrote:3.28pm: Lord Grabiner says correspondence between board and owner prove that H&G knew of the meeting on 5 October and instead they simply refused to turn up and not, as their QC says, that they were excluded from it by the "sub-committee".

Lord Grabiner describes the owners as "slippery" because they wanted a one week adjournment to that meeting knowing full well that NESV's deadline for their offer to expired on 5 October.

Also, Hicks had a lawyer, Bruce Toth, listening to that meeting via telephone as an observer, destroying their argument that they were excluded from that crucial meeting.

--

is that where the 5 october deadline may have come from???

yer must be. looking over the news forum most reporters say they can not call it.

F*ck me.. You wanna get out of that news place you hang out.. Are you sure it aint full of mancs and yanks?

by **lakes10** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:42 pm

Steve Crooks wrote:
lakes10 wrote:
Redman in wales wrote:3.28pm: Lord Grabiner says correspondence between board and owner prove that H&G knew of the meeting on 5 October and instead they simply refused to turn up and not, as their QC says, that they were excluded from it by the "sub-committee".

Lord Grabiner describes the owners as "slippery" because they wanted a one week adjournment to that meeting knowing full well that NESV's deadline for their offer to expired on 5 October.

Also, Hicks had a lawyer, Bruce Toth, listening to that meeting via telephone as an observer, destroying their argument that they were excluded from that crucial meeting.

--

is that where the 5 october deadline may have come from???

yer must be. looking over the news forum most reporters say they can not call it.

F*ck me.. You wanna get out of that news place you hang out.. Are you sure it aint full of mancs and yanks?

might just be lol

by **RedSi35** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:43 pm

lol poor old Bruce Toth, if he listened in and made no arguments to the discussions regarding the sale of the club, then he may have just lost his clients a pretty penny

Liverpool FC Forum

TAKEOVER COMPLETE - H & G Finally Jibbed!

Who is online