Liverpool FC Forum

by **worcester_red** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:20 pm

maypaxvobiscum wrote:
lakes10 wrote:
maypaxvobiscum wrote:then what were the other dates such as Oct 6 and Oct 15 all about?

dont know mate,i am just reading stuff off other news site forums.

damn. its getting worse each passing minute

there are only 16 days between, Oct 15th and Nov 1st so who cares, it is just a minor stay of execution. No one in their right mind will give Hicks the money he needs.

by **metalhead** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:20 pm

andy_g wrote:go on Lord Grabiner, mate. go for the fecking jugular, kidda!

He is... its a matter of time until he gives his killer blow :nod

by **lakes10** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:20 pm

well is not on the court list for tomoz si if they have to go back it will be another day.

by **andy_g** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:22 pm

even when i've been in court myself i don't think i've ever wanted to see a defense lawyer put in such a good performance :laugh:

by **europian-kings** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:22 pm

3:20 This could be a defining point in the case. Lord Grabiner QC (for the board) has pointed out that Hicks got his son involved last week, despite him not being a board member.

by **lakes10** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:23 pm

europian-kings wrote:3:20 This could be a defining point in the case. Lord Grabiner QC (for the board) has pointed out that Hicks got his son involved last week, despite him not being a board member.

yep hicks

up, his in breach of the board now.

by **metalhead** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:24 pm

europian-kings wrote:3:20 This could be a defining point in the case. Lord Grabiner QC (for the board) has pointed out that Hicks got his son involved last week, despite him not being a board member.

I'm more confident now :nod

by **RobinHood6969** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:25 pm

europian-kings wrote:3:20 This could be a defining point in the case. Lord Grabiner QC (for the board) has pointed out that Hicks got his son involved last week, despite him not being a board member.

by **RedSi35** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:26 pm

jacdaniel wrote:2.46pm: From court: G&H QC dismisses Friday's deadline and says that instead the owners and RBS are "locked into an agreement" until 1 November.

WTF?

Is he requesting that it be 1st November?

by **GRAHAM01** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:26 pm

feel sick just want this sorted and now

by **Ciggy** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:27 pm

danroan Dan Roan
Tension mounting-Lord Grabiner qc now speaking for LFC - says H&G guilty of "slippery behaviour"

Is right Grabbo

by **lakes10** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:28 pm

RedSi35 wrote:
jacdaniel wrote:2.46pm: From court: G&H QC dismisses Friday's deadline and says that instead the owners and RBS are "locked into an agreement" until 1 November.

WTF?

Is he requesting that it be 1st November?

no mate he is say that the is an agreement untill the 1st nov, i read on another forum that paperwork was handed over at that point.

by **maypaxvobiscum** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:28 pm

i think us Liverpool fans are the most versatile and educated fans after today

by **dawson99** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:28 pm

Hicks is a c*nt

see you lot later, need to get drunk

by **andy_g** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:30 pm

dawson99 wrote:Hicks is a c*nt

excellent point, mate. lets hope grabbo mentions that one.

Liverpool FC Forum

TAKEOVER COMPLETE - H & G Finally Jibbed!

Who is online