Liverpool FC Forum

by **worcester_red** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:10 pm

Steve Crooks wrote:
worcester_red wrote:
lakes10 wrote:
bavlondon wrote:
Ciggy wrote:WTF wheres our lawyers when are they going to speak twit & tw@ts case is looking very strong, if the debt is not paid by friday a 60 million penalty fine is getting added and we go into administration.

Does that still apply? QC has said Friday's deadline has been dismissed, his contract is until 1st November.

Im confused.

yer it looks like rbs have just lot the right to pull the loan untill the 1st.

erm, how?

They haven't.. dont worry..

To be honest I was just curious how he came to that weird conclusion.

by **lakes10** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:11 pm

i take it that there only 50 mins left now for today, dont the high court end at 4pm?

by **maypaxvobiscum** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:12 pm

Lakes how on earth did you come to that conclusion? im reading it over and over again but i fail to see sense in it.

by **lakes10** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:12 pm

worcester_red wrote:
Steve Crooks wrote:
worcester_red wrote:
lakes10 wrote:
bavlondon wrote:
Ciggy wrote:WTF wheres our lawyers when are they going to speak twit & tw@ts case is looking very strong, if the debt is not paid by friday a 60 million penalty fine is getting added and we go into administration.

Does that still apply? QC has said Friday's deadline has been dismissed, his contract is until 1st November.

Im confused.

yer it looks like rbs have just lot the right to pull the loan untill the 1st.

erm, how?

They haven't.. dont worry..

To be honest I was just curious how he came to that weird conclusion.

not that strange, QC for hicks handed a contract that shows it runs untill the 1st

by **maypaxvobiscum** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:13 pm

then what were the other dates such as Oct 6 and Oct 15 all about?

by **Ciggy** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:13 pm

This is not going to end today is it :down:

by **lakes10** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:14 pm

maypaxvobiscum wrote:then what were the other dates such as Oct 6 and Oct 15 all about?

dont know mate,i am just reading stuff off other news site forums.

by **lakes10** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:15 pm

Ciggy wrote:This is not going to end today is it

get your sleeping bag out cigs

by **tubby** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:15 pm

3.08pm: In Hicks's letter/witness statement to the court he writes that during telephone meeting the board had at the start of last week (the one which broke down at adjournment), Hicks Jr was involved. Lord Grabiner questions why this happened as "Hicks Minor" is not on the board.

by **RobinHood6969** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:15 pm

maypaxvobiscum wrote:Lakes how on earth did you come to that conclusion? im reading it over and over again but i fail to see sense in it.

May be we shouldnt blame Lake's mates but him

They would have informed him something but he thought it to be something else

by **lakes10** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:16 pm

Hicks Jr was involved???

well then thats a breach by Hicks

by **worcester_red** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:16 pm

Ciggy wrote:This is not going to end today is it

nope, it will end later today with a back room deal to Lim for prob about £350 million I reckon.
Hicks knows that he is fecked one way or the other so just wants to get a bit more money out of NESV or Lim and I don't think NESV will play ball, pun very much intended.

by **maypaxvobiscum** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:17 pm

lakes10 wrote:
maypaxvobiscum wrote:then what were the other dates such as Oct 6 and Oct 15 all about?

dont know mate,i am just reading stuff off other news site forums.

damn. its getting worse each passing minute

by **Steve Crooks** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:19 pm

"Hicks minor"... :laugh:

by **andy_g** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:19 pm

go on Lord Grabiner, mate. go for the fecking jugular, kidda!

Liverpool FC Forum

TAKEOVER COMPLETE - H & G Finally Jibbed!

Who is online