Liverpool FC Forum

by **maypaxvobiscum** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:58 pm

lakes10 wrote:2.49pm: In accidentally sent email Martin Broughton mentioned Hicks and Gillet "batting for the other side" along with photoshopped image attachment of the two Americans appearing in lewd sex act. Mr Justice Floyd asks for a copy.

by **moop1970** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:00 pm

OMG When is this gonna get sorted! I think my colleagues at work are gonna start shouting at me to do some WORK!!!

by **worcester_red** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:00 pm

Hicks and Gillett are on their last legs, this is truly pathetic and I honestly cannot fathom how either of these remtards ever amassed a fortune, although it looks like it's dwindling now.

by **metalhead** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:02 pm

Lord Grabiner QC is now speaking on behalf of the Liverpool board. He tells the court the two alternative offers for the club are "besides the mark" as it is the role of the board to find a buyer, so if they decide to go for NESV then so be it.

--------------------

HERE HERE! :buttrock

by **tubby** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:03 pm

Ciggy wrote:WTF wheres our lawyers when are they going to speak twit & tw@ts case is looking very strong, if the debt is not paid by friday a 60 million penalty fine is getting added and we go into administration.

Does that still apply? QC has said Friday's deadline has been dismissed, his contract is until 1st November.

Im confused.

by **metalhead** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:05 pm

Lord Grabiner QC for the Liverpool board: If H&G have accepted they must sell the club and simply want it done in the right way (as they QC said they have) then why are they not merely claiming for damages instead of trying to hold on to a "unique asset" (ie Liverpool FC).

---------------

:bowdown

by **lakes10** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:05 pm

bavlondon wrote:
Ciggy wrote:WTF wheres our lawyers when are they going to speak twit & tw@ts case is looking very strong, if the debt is not paid by friday a 60 million penalty fine is getting added and we go into administration.

Does that still apply? QC has said Friday's deadline has been dismissed, his contract is until 1st November.

Im confused.

yer it looks like rbs have just lot the right to pull the loan untill the 1st.

by **maypaxvobiscum** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:06 pm

Lord Grabiner QC for the Liverpool board: If H&G have accepted they must sell the club and simply want it done in the right way (as they QC said they have) then why are they not merely claiming for damages instead of trying to hold on to a "unique asset"

by **tubby** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:06 pm

3.01pm: Lord Grabiner QC for the Liverpool board: If H&G have accepted they must sell the club and simply want it done in the right way (as they QC said they have) then why are they not merely claiming for damages instead of trying to hold on to a "unique asset" (ie Liverpool FC).

2.57pm: Lord Grabiner QC is now speaking on behalf of the Liverpool board. He tells the court the two alternative offers for the club are "besides the mark" as it is the role of the board to find a buyer, so if they decide to go for NESV then so be it.

by **Steve Crooks** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:07 pm

lakes10 wrote:
bavlondon wrote:
Ciggy wrote:WTF wheres our lawyers when are they going to speak twit & tw@ts case is looking very strong, if the debt is not paid by friday a 60 million penalty fine is getting added and we go into administration.

Does that still apply? QC has said Friday's deadline has been dismissed, his contract is until 1st November.

Im confused.

yer it looks like rbs have just lot the right to pull the loan untill the 1st.

No, they haven't.. More stalling tactics by H&G, thats all.. :no

by **worcester_red** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:08 pm

lakes10 wrote:
bavlondon wrote:
Ciggy wrote:WTF wheres our lawyers when are they going to speak twit & tw@ts case is looking very strong, if the debt is not paid by friday a 60 million penalty fine is getting added and we go into administration.

Does that still apply? QC has said Friday's deadline has been dismissed, his contract is until 1st November.

Im confused.

yer it looks like rbs have just lot the right to pull the loan untill the 1st.

erm, how?

by **Steve Crooks** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:09 pm

worcester_red wrote:
lakes10 wrote:
bavlondon wrote:
Ciggy wrote:WTF wheres our lawyers when are they going to speak twit & tw@ts case is looking very strong, if the debt is not paid by friday a 60 million penalty fine is getting added and we go into administration.

Does that still apply? QC has said Friday's deadline has been dismissed, his contract is until 1st November.

Im confused.

yer it looks like rbs have just lot the right to pull the loan untill the 1st.

erm, how?

They haven't.. dont worry..

by **metalhead** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:09 pm

bavlondon wrote:3.01pm: Lord Grabiner QC for the Liverpool board: If H&G have accepted they must sell the club and simply want it done in the right way (as they QC said they have) then why are they not merely claiming for damages instead of trying to hold on to a "unique asset" (ie Liverpool FC).

2.57pm: Lord Grabiner QC is now speaking on behalf of the Liverpool board. He tells the court the two alternative offers for the club are "besides the mark" as it is the role of the board to find a buyer, so if they decide to go for NESV then so be it.

Thats how we do it in ma neighborhood :buttrock

superb claim by Lord Grabiner

by **dawson99** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:09 pm

So are we or are we not f*cked?

by **metalhead** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:09 pm

dawson99 wrote:So are we or are we not f*cked?

read what Lord Grabiner is claiming, good stuff that

Liverpool FC Forum

TAKEOVER COMPLETE - H & G Finally Jibbed!

Who is online