Liverpool FC Forum

by **GRAHAM01** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:40 pm

Benny The Noon wrote:
Reg wrote:
GRAHAM01 wrote:
supersub wrote:I agree with everything you say and welcome to the takeover thread....now f.ck off back to the Jose thread

he only came in cos he got lost

I keep re-reading his comment.... its a trick.... theres no reference to Rafa.

It's not Mick - no mention of 7th place or sky is blue and even more shocking not one mention of any group .

someone has taken his laptop or he has had a bang to the head :wwww

by **metalhead** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:41 pm

on further note Reg, I do think Broughton knew this will happen, and prepared the case in advance :nod

by **shabelle50** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:41 pm

I see little reason to worry. The judge is unlikely to rule in favour of H&G. Even if he does and Broughton loses the appeal RBS will probably just sell the club to NESV at a lower price and without any penalty fee being imposed.

by **GRAHAM01** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:42 pm

metalhead wrote:on further note Reg, I do think Broughton knew this will happen, and prepared the case in advance

you would have thought so, i bet he has been through it with a fine tooth combe well i bloody hope so anyway

by **lakes10** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:54 pm

red till i die!! wrote:
lakes10 wrote:what hicks is asking the court to do is to block the sale of the club by person no longer at the club, in a clever way he has set up a new board at liverpool, as owner he has the right to do this.......sort of.

he will ask the club to be frozen untill the 23rd nov, giving him time to get a new loan (looks like with citibank) to pay rbs off.

its danger all the way.

how do you know this lakes??
or are you speculating??

no mae, its what they were talking about on the news today.

by **RED BEERGOGGLES** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:56 pm

This video will explain the depths Hicks is willing to go ...and the lengths his influential friends will go
Hicks and George Bush

by **lakes10** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:57 pm

supersub wrote:
bigmick wrote:Lakes despite posting 569 times on here and making 487 predictions, you never once mentioned these lot as a possibility to the best of my knowledge. That's point one, my second point is that this new lot look OK to me. My third point is that I think the thing will go through, and Hicks and Gillette will get feck all, rightly so.

It finally only remains for me to say Mick was ere .

I agree with everything you say and welcome to the takeover thread....now f.ck off back to the Jose thread

pmsl, but he has a point, as i said i did not know who they were by name, all i have ever known about them is "un named americans" and they only had the money to be a 3rd party, so to find it was them that had made the board spilt was a shock.. but filled in a lot of gaps.

by **lakes10** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:58 pm

RED BEERGOGGLES wrote:This video will explain the depths Hicks is willing to go ...and the lengths his influential friends will go
Hicks and George Bush

yer and when its hits the high court you never know what could happen....funny handshakes and b um slapping.

by **OneHotRed** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 4:09 pm

WUM slapping :P

by **maguskwt** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 4:11 pm

lakes10 wrote:
red till i die!! wrote:
lakes10 wrote:what hicks is asking the court to do is to block the sale of the club by person no longer at the club, in a clever way he has set up a new board at liverpool, as owner he has the right to do this.......sort of.

he will ask the club to be frozen untill the 23rd nov, giving him time to get a new loan (looks like with citibank) to pay rbs off.

its danger all the way.

how do you know this lakes??
or are you speculating??

no mae, its what they were talking about on the news today.

Wait... how can Hicks do that if they have written agreement when Broughton was appointed Chairman that only the latter could change the board members? This is one of the conditions of the load extension by RBS...

by **RED BEERGOGGLES** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 4:16 pm

lakes10 wrote:
RED BEERGOGGLES wrote:This video will explain the depths Hicks is willing to go ...and the lengths his influential friends will go
Hicks and George Bush

yer and when its hits the high court you never know what could happen....funny handshakes and b um slapping.

Dont know about the slapping ...but I wont sleep until its done and dusted and this Twat is gone for good

by **lakes10** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 4:25 pm

maguskwt wrote:
lakes10 wrote:
red till i die!! wrote:
lakes10 wrote:what hicks is asking the court to do is to block the sale of the club by person no longer at the club, in a clever way he has set up a new board at liverpool, as owner he has the right to do this.......sort of.

he will ask the club to be frozen untill the 23rd nov, giving him time to get a new loan (looks like with citibank) to pay rbs off.

its danger all the way.

how do you know this lakes??
or are you speculating??

no mae, its what they were talking about on the news today.

Wait... how can Hicks do that if they have written agreement when Broughton was appointed Chairman that only the latter could change the board members? This is one of the conditions of the load extension by RBS...

er as its going to cost hicks over 100mil, i take it that there was a bit put in that it could be sold at a loss or something.

on the face of it hicks dont stand a chance but as they say, you can not tell what might happen once its at the high court.

by **maguskwt** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 4:25 pm

Benny The Noon wrote:
Reg wrote:
GRAHAM01 wrote:
supersub wrote:I agree with everything you say and welcome to the takeover thread....now f.ck off back to the Jose thread

he only came in cos he got lost

I keep re-reading his comment.... its a trick.... theres no reference to Rafa.

It's not Mick - no mention of 7th place or sky is blue and even more shocking not one mention of any group .

It's DENYING the sky is blue mate...

yeah agreed this might not be Mick...

by **zarababe** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 4:26 pm

stmichael wrote:
jacdaniel wrote:
metalhead wrote:
jacdaniel wrote:Has anyone read Harry Redknapps comments defending Hicks and Gillett for all of this? What an idiot!

He seems to think that the Americans invested loads of money and Rafa wasted it all.

i thought he'd know better being Jamie's dad.

any links?

Harry Redknapp - C*nt

I just heard he writes some column for the fecking S*n!!
That makes it even worse.

this from the man who bankrupt pompey. priceless.

can't wait for rafa and inter to smash spurs all over the place

and on that note - get emailing ppl I have sent him this:

harry.redknapp@tottenhamhotspur.com

Hello Harry,

Read your comments re: your sympathy for the current Liverpool owners.

You will no-doubt appreciate that Liverpool is servicing an unsustainable debt which threatens it's survival and the current owners are responsible for that - so I'm sure you will also appreciate for a club of Liverpool's stature and following, allowing the current owners to drive this great institution in to the ground, is not something that the footballing world would want to standby, watch and condone - even if it something that has benefitted the likes of 'spurs', short-term.

We all have to do what we do to earn a living, but scribing sympathy for the lot of two people who are driving Liverpool FC under, is not befitting of you - infact it is quite unbelievable that you actually belive that !

I suppose given where you're other clubs have ended-up you don't sympathise with rescuing a situtaion before it results in the outcomes of Porstmouth and co?

I know Rafa's inter will be upon you soon - I sincerely hope they beat you !

Zara

by **maguskwt** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 4:27 pm

lakes10 wrote:
maguskwt wrote:
lakes10 wrote:
red till i die!! wrote:
lakes10 wrote:what hicks is asking the court to do is to block the sale of the club by person no longer at the club, in a clever way he has set up a new board at liverpool, as owner he has the right to do this.......sort of.

he will ask the club to be frozen untill the 23rd nov, giving him time to get a new loan (looks like with citibank) to pay rbs off.

its danger all the way.

how do you know this lakes??
or are you speculating??

no mae, its what they were talking about on the news today.

Wait... how can Hicks do that if they have written agreement when Broughton was appointed Chairman that only the latter could change the board members? This is one of the conditions of the load extension by RBS...

er as its going to cost hicks over 100mil, i take it that there was a bit put in that it could be sold at a loss or something.

on the face of it hicks dont stand a chance but as they say, you can not tell what might happen once its at the high court.

Riiiight... of course... how come we never thought about that? :rasp

Liverpool FC Forum

TAKEOVER COMPLETE - H & G Finally Jibbed!

Who is online