Liverpool FC Forum

bigmick wrote:It would be the supremest of ironies if the cronies who the two c...s brought in (Ayres, Broughton and Purslow) actually voted against them and sent them packing with next to no profit  Now that would be funny.

bigmick wrote:It would be the supremest of ironies if the cronies who the two c...s brought in (Ayres, Broughton and Purslow) actually voted against them and sent them packing with next to no profit  Now that would be funny.

Aye, I'd buy that for a dollar!!!!

lakes10 wrote:this is all turning into a mess of lies and spin.

And the winner of the Newkit 'most ironic post of the year' award goes to............

lakes10 wrote:a mess of lies and spin

That's normally the basis of all your posts.

Scottbot wrote:

bigmick wrote:It would be the supremest of ironies if the cronies who the two c...s brought in (Ayres, Broughton and Purslow) actually voted against them and sent them packing with next to no profit  Now that would be funny.

Aye, I'd buy that for a dollar!!!!

Would not be the greastest day.

New owners from china, roy given 150mill to spend, and hicks gets all.

I might have to make the 12 hour round trip to help with the party!

Scottbot wrote:

lakes10 wrote:this is all turning into a mess of lies and spin.

And the winner of the Newkit 'most ironic post of the year' award goes to............

 

7_Kewell wrote:

Scottbot wrote:

lakes10 wrote:this is all turning into a mess of lies and spin.

And the winner of the Newkit 'most ironic post of the year' award goes to............

 

spin yes
 

Ciggy wrote:

devaney wrote:What however followed was a leverage process that has endangered the very existence of LFC. On that basis let's never use the phrase we'll cross that bridge when we come to it because it will be too late!

If you read what I said properly I said to Lakes lets cross that bridge when we come to it about Human Rights protestors running on the pitch, not about the actual take over.

People only have to check the labels on their clothes and things in the house to see where they are made nearly everything is made in China, should we boycott everything made in China we would have nothing left.
im not clued up on their human rights, but the sharia law in the middle east is of the dinosaur ages in some parts, no ones complaining about Citys owner.

Birminghams owner is from China no ones complaining about the human rights and him, our current owner Hicks was behind George Bush getting into power look at the devistation that horrible b@stard has caused in the Middle East and our soliders being killed because HE decided to invade Iraq.

Who is clean these days in business/money? Hicks didnt get rich helping old ladies cross the road this b@stard hasnt cared who he has hurt/hurts in the process of earning a quick buck, the same goes for Abramovich he earned his money from erm "U know what"

This Ambani fella whos interested look at the poor people in India, Mumbai and the likes, we could go on and on about it all day we just have to wait and see how it pans out before we get panic stricken over China's, India, Saudi Arabia's Human Right.

There is no 'clean' money anywhere. Someone, somewhere, had to suffer for it.

I don't agree with you often.

But that is a good post.

You can't do anything these days without someone trying to twist something into controversy.   

Lee J wrote:China to take over us. Pay off the debt, build a new stadium and maybe give Roy £40m to bolster the team up a bit.

We're not too keen on that now are we?

jacdaniel wrote:The Chinese bid definitly seems like the best way to go.

i agree with Scott on the article above... all it says is that they will take on the debt.  it never once says that they will pay it off or do anything about it.

it also doesn't mention any investment in the squad.