Judge wrote:JBG wrote:Caught stinking red handed saint mick!
moderate that

Judge wrote:JBG wrote:Caught stinking red handed saint mick!
moderate that
Reg wrote:Check the Dallas papers on the net and search under Tom Hicks. He´s no pussy this lad and if Rafa calls his bluff, Rafa will lose. Thats how people like Hicks have become successful businessmen.
Effes wrote:Reg wrote:Check the Dallas papers on the net and search under Tom Hicks. He´s no pussy this lad and if Rafa calls his bluff, Rafa will lose. Thats how people like Hicks have become successful businessmen.
Successful businessman does not = successful footbal chairman
See Ken Bates.
Here's a report on Hicks and his hockey team:
As it turns out, Hicks wasn't any crazier about the Stars' failure to add firepower in the off-season than disgruntled fans, players and media. "Disappointed," is how he put it. When Columbus called asking about Armstrong's availability, the owner discussed the possibilities with his GM. Ultimately, Hicks said, "We decided to go forward."
But Hicks' doubts had been building, and not just about the roster. He wondered if a once-model organization had gone stale. On nearly any question about the Stars, he normally would have consulted Jim Lites. Or talked hockey with Armstrong. But Armstrong sensed some distance from the owner lately. Lites didn't get a call.
"I just wanted a more objective viewpoint," Hicks said.
So he went outside the organization, to a couple of friends in the NHL. And he talked to Mike Modano.
The preseason confab between Hicks and his star player couldn't have helped Armstrong's cause. Hicks wouldn't reveal what was discussed, but you don't have to channel Don Cherry to imagine where Modano stood. Armstrong was behind the decision to rip the "C" from Modano's sweater. He traded Joe Nieuwendyk and Jamie Langenbrunner and dumped Darryl Sydor, all vital parts in the franchise's success, all friends of Modano's.
Armstrong also represented a system that had always asked Modano to sacrifice and never played to his strengths. And when Modano desperately needed help to carry some of the scoring load, Armstrong in effect told him he'd done all he could. The former captain would have to shoulder the burden on his own.
Very interesting stuff:
peewee wrote:stmichael wrote:peewee wrote:there probably is money to spend but i imagine they are loathe to pay 22 million for a substitute or for someone who will spend time out the team in some ludicrous rotation policy
Oh please, It's down to rotation? Are you Lawrenson in disguise?
Personally I hear Hicks is not a big fan of zonal marking either.
i like the way you copy my comment and put it verbatim on another forum as though you wrote it yourself.
anyone interested in seeing copying at its best look here
http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=199837.160
ffs mick have you no shame, you slag my comment on here then pass it off as your own on RAWK
Effes wrote:peewee wrote:stmichael wrote:peewee wrote:there probably is money to spend but i imagine they are loathe to pay 22 million for a substitute or for someone who will spend time out the team in some ludicrous rotation policy
Oh please, It's down to rotation? Are you Lawrenson in disguise?
Personally I hear Hicks is not a big fan of zonal marking either.
i like the way you copy my comment and put it verbatim on another forum as though you wrote it yourself.
anyone interested in seeing copying at its best look here
http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=199837.160
ffs mick have you no shame, you slag my comment on here then pass it off as your own on RAWK
Oh my god - he even copied the response from RAWK and added it here as his own.
Sad
s@int wrote:Effes wrote:peewee wrote:stmichael wrote:peewee wrote:there probably is money to spend but i imagine they are loathe to pay 22 million for a substitute or for someone who will spend time out the team in some ludicrous rotation policy
Oh please, It's down to rotation? Are you Lawrenson in disguise?
Personally I hear Hicks is not a big fan of zonal marking either.
i like the way you copy my comment and put it verbatim on another forum as though you wrote it yourself.
anyone interested in seeing copying at its best look here
http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=199837.160
ffs mick have you no shame, you slag my comment on here then pass it off as your own on RAWK
Oh my god - he even copied the response from RAWK and added it here as his own.
Sad
FFS thats unbelievable, he not only copied peewees post to RAWK but he copied his reply to peewee's post off someone on RAWK on to here
Effes wrote:Moyes is a little up-start - they are obsessed with us
Ciggy wrote:Bog eyed Gobshite taking the p!ss, whats he ever won cheeky b@stard.
http://gwladtidings.merseyblogs.co.uk/2007/11/moysie.html
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/videos-....0152724
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests