azriahmad wrote:Morrientes is very skillful but he is not one who will bang in 20 plus goals a season. At Madrid, he is the supporting striker to Raul in the past and has created numerous chances for his strike partners. If I am not mistaken, his best tally was 18 a couple of seasons ago wheras Raul and Rolando gets 20+ (Raul had not been in this form for some tiem now).
Morrientes would be a good bet to breach the deadlock in tight matches but I fear he may have to adjust to the hustle and bustle of the EPL where defenders get a lot of leeway for physical challenges as compared to the continent. This si where Cisse really struggled.
Anelka, as a comparison, is more of a finisher and he has done a tremendous job at Man City givent their poor team and is fully adapted to the Premiership. he can also play in the Premiership and has shown his quality when he scored in both legs of the Champions' League semi or quarter for Real Madrid against Bayern Munich. The only thing is his attitude and the very negative influence of his brothers who act as his agent or advisers and successfully unsettled him at Arsenal, Real Madrid and PSG.
I'd go for Anelka given that the EPL top 4 finish is a must and it is very unlikely that we will win the CL as we don't have enough quality at this moment. He did not score many when he was on loan to us because of the way Houllier's team played with no build up and straight punt for Owen to chase.
adayinthelife wrote:azriahmad wrote:Morrientes is very skillful but he is not one who will bang in 20 plus goals a season. At Madrid, he is the supporting striker to Raul in the past and has created numerous chances for his strike partners. If I am not mistaken, his best tally was 18 a couple of seasons ago wheras Raul and Rolando gets 20+ (Raul had not been in this form for some tiem now).
Morrientes would be a good bet to breach the deadlock in tight matches but I fear he may have to adjust to the hustle and bustle of the EPL where defenders get a lot of leeway for physical challenges as compared to the continent. This si where Cisse really struggled.
Anelka, as a comparison, is more of a finisher and he has done a tremendous job at Man City givent their poor team and is fully adapted to the Premiership. he can also play in the Premiership and has shown his quality when he scored in both legs of the Champions' League semi or quarter for Real Madrid against Bayern Munich. The only thing is his attitude and the very negative influence of his brothers who act as his agent or advisers and successfully unsettled him at Arsenal, Real Madrid and PSG.
I'd go for Anelka given that the EPL top 4 finish is a must and it is very unlikely that we will win the CL as we don't have enough quality at this moment. He did not score many when he was on loan to us because of the way Houllier's team played with no build up and straight punt for Owen to chase.
It has to be Morientes for me as just because he isn't proven in England he is made for the premier league.
Compare that to Anelka who is proven like people say but yet only managed 4 goals in 20 games when on loan with us?
Morientes also has 23 goals in 36 games for Spain compared to Anelka with 6 goals in 28 games for France.
Anelka has been living off 1 good season for arsenal when he was a youngster that earned him a move to madrid where he was a complete failure.
He scored a very poor 16 goals in 4 seasons after he left arsenal despite having 2 seasons in France.
Since going to man city he has scored 30 odd goals in 2 seasons which is not great considering he is the main man,takes penalties and plays for a very attacking team.
Add to all that his mental problems which some people say have been blown out of proportion yet if we don't qualify for the champions lge next season it would be only a matter of time before he started moaning.
Compare all that to Morientes who finished top scorer in last seasons champions lge despite playing for a 2nd rate team.
He has also shown he can perform at a big team which Anelka has failed to do apart from 1 season as a youngster.
Morientes has also had to sit on the bench for long periods at madrid but at any other team he would be a regular and people would see how good he is yet he has still managed nearly 100 goals in la liga.
He would also be an ideal partner for Baros who has played his best football alongside that giant Koller in the Czech team.
Morientes is in a different league to Koller as despite being huge is not a great header and his skill level is very poor compared to Morientes who has a great 1st touch and is a superb finisher.
IMO Anelka is a quality player but he is very much an individual which we already have in Baros and Cisse where as Morientes is a great target man who could finally get on the end of some crosses and is much more of a team player.
Morientes although 3 years older at 28 has rarely started more than 20 games a season and doesn't rely on his pace so I reckon he has at least 4 or 5 years left.
The only problem with Morientes is him being cup tied in europe which is not ideal but with him I think we have every chance of making the champions lge for next season where with Anelka he can play in europe but thats about it as IMO he is more trouble than he is worth.
aco67 wrote:No-one's mentioned James Beattie
1. He's English
2. He's big & strong
3. Redknapp will sell him in January
aco67 wrote:No-one's mentioned James Beattie
1. He's English
2. He's big & strong
true Mellor's frustrating inablility to combine with some of the one-touch play that was evident at times today.. hightlights some real limitations.. Baros was frustrated bv his lack of awareness more than once today.. he ain't the future ... but credit to the lad for putting-em in the net...
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 66 guests
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.