by JC_81 » Mon Oct 03, 2005 9:57 am
I am beginning to think that the answer is no, Crouch cannot play as a lone striker. It was evident yesterday, and in fact in previous games also that we are far too static in the final third. This is partly because our wingers are actually not natural wingers, and partly because our centre forward has got absolutely no pace or movement off the ball.
Crouch has been playing well, don't get me wrong, and I think he will be a good signing, but playing up on his own especially in home games is not good enough. His hold up play is good, he takes the ball down well and has a good touch. I don't mind playing Crouch up front on his own in tough away games where a draw may be acceptable, but at home and against the lesser teams we need someone with pace alongside him.
Playing Crouch on his own allows us to lump it into the box more often, but the ball over the top is not playable with Crouch, we can't play through balls and turn the opposition defence. Compare him with Baros who played as a lone striker for us for much of last season. For all Baros' flaws as a player, he was very useful as a lone striker. He has excellent movement, was hard to mark and you could play the ball over the top for him.
My point is that a lone striker has to be more mobile than Crouch is. We are going to continue to struggle to score in games until Crouch plays alonside someone with pace. I am not sure Cisse is the answer, but surely he has to be used at least until January when he will probably be replaced.