maguskwt wrote:peewee wrote:maguskwt wrote:peewee wrote:did we have an attempt on goal in the second half?
another drab boring game although one point is more than we could have hoped for, however with a manager who had a clue about subs we could possibly have left will all 3
how convenient... dont' mention about the 3 BEST CHANCES IN THE GAME which fell to CROUCH... and he MISSED in the first half....
i dont understand what crouch's headers have to do with subs in the second half
errr... geez let me see how i can put this clearly for you to understand... ok here you go... why would you put the blame on rafa's subs for not getting us 3 points and conveniently ignore the misses by crouch one of which is a clear cut sitter INSIDE the penalty box which a striker in the second league would have put away (not all of them are headers you know)... ? I don't know... why oh why?
so the fact that 3 headers were missed meant that we had to do something in the second half, so maybe if he had been bothered to actually use more than one sub and change things round we could have won,
the logic you are trying to use here is baffling, because we missed a few chances then rafa already had a scapegoat and an excuse so he was able to sit back and do nothing, is that really the point you are trying to get across? so again i ask what the missed chances had to do with rafas lack of logic when making changes in the second half, now lets be honest he has never been good when it comes to changes
jeez its not rocket science mate