LFC1990 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:31 am wrote:Am I the only one who wants to know why he thinks we need a new goalkeeper?
I thought that was pretty self explanitory...
I want us to have a good one, not an overrated one.
LFC1990 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:31 am wrote:Am I the only one who wants to know why he thinks we need a new goalkeeper?
SouthCoastShankly » Thu Jan 16, 2014 11:07 am wrote:LFC1990 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:56 am wrote:No, Stu the inbRed
You have to remember with Stu. Once she gets her knickers in a twist with a certain player, that's it there's no going back.
devaney » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:33 pm wrote:SouthCoastShankly » Thu Jan 16, 2014 11:07 am wrote:LFC1990 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:56 am wrote:No, Stu the inbRed
You have to remember with Stu. Once she gets her knickers in a twist with a certain player, that's it there's no going back.
Don't exaggerate SCSStu has only castigated Johnson, Lucas, Skrtel, Mingolet, Allen and Cissoko who is terrible but that is beside the point. Sturridge hasn't escaped criticism either. Look on the bright side Stu does like Luis
Sorry Stu but you don't half like a good moan. What are you like if you miss a three foot put? The team is far from perfect but 6 points from the top is a cracking effort with what we have available. Rome was rebuilt in a day !!!!!!!
supersub » Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:22 pm wrote:Mignolet was bought as a good keeper...he is a good keeper......who has over rated him.....
Reina was a good keeper who lost his way during his last 2 seasons...reina wanted a change and he did, just not the move he wanted or anticipated....any discussion about how we would have faired with Reina in goal is purely hypothetical and has no relevance in fact.....Mignolet has gained more points for us than he has lost so he is doing ok ... personally I don't think Reina would have achieved any better ....
My main concern is BR's insistence on accommodating Steven Gerrard into the starting 11 and therefore jeopardising any hope of a top 4 finish.
supersub » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:22 pm
My main concern is BR's insistence on accommodating Steven Gerrard into the starting 11 and therefore jeopardising any hope of a top 4 finish.
supersub » Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:19 pm wrote:Steven Gerrard was ambitious with his passing from deep at Stoke (red = unsuccessful)
As his interpretation of the role at the Britannia Stadium showed, Gerrard remains an altogether different beast. His pass completion rate against Stoke was just 76 per cent. That desire to look forward with his passing saw him surrender possession on 18 occasions, unusual for a player in that role and three times as many as Lucas, despite the Brazilian receiving the ball in trickier positions higher up the field.
And this will be our Achilles heal when we play better teams than Stoke.....
woof woof ! » Thu Jan 16, 2014 4:51 pm wrote:supersub » Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:19 pm wrote:Steven Gerrard was ambitious with his passing from deep at Stoke (red = unsuccessful)
As his interpretation of the role at the Britannia Stadium showed, Gerrard remains an altogether different beast. His pass completion rate against Stoke was just 76 per cent. That desire to look forward with his passing saw him surrender possession on 18 occasions, unusual for a player in that role and three times as many as Lucas, despite the Brazilian receiving the ball in trickier positions higher up the field.
And this will be our Achilles heal when we play better teams than Stoke.....
Gerrard was maybe trying to hard. :
woof woof ! » Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:51 pm wrote:supersub » Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:19 pm wrote:Steven Gerrard was ambitious with his passing from deep at Stoke (red = unsuccessful)
As his interpretation of the role at the Britannia Stadium showed, Gerrard remains an altogether different beast. His pass completion rate against Stoke was just 76 per cent. That desire to look forward with his passing saw him surrender possession on 18 occasions, unusual for a player in that role and three times as many as Lucas, despite the Brazilian receiving the ball in trickier positions higher up the field.
And this will be our Achilles heal when we play better teams than Stoke.....
Agree that Gerrard wasn't up to snuff against Stoke and I've commented in the Stoke match thread that Gerrard was maybe trying to hard. I do however believe that Stevie has all the technical qualities to succeed in BR's envisioned role provided he can apply the right mindset and not always look for the "hollywood" ball.
Call me sentimental but I also think that those who are quick to jump on a man who admittedly is in decline but has virtually carried this team for the last five seasons can all f'uck of
Steven George Gerrard is already a f'ucking legend for this club up there with any others you care to name and HE'S NOT FINISHED YET !
You Kunts :kungfu:
devaney » Thu Jan 16, 2014 5:11 pm wrote:We won 5-3 with a shi.t defence. Gerrard is the least of my worries
woof woof ! » Thu Jan 16, 2014 6:26 pm wrote:devaney » Thu Jan 16, 2014 5:11 pm wrote:We won 5-3 with a shi.t defence. Gerrard is the least of my worries
Yeah mate , if only half the muppets in here realised we've got far bigger things to worry about other than the legend that is Steven Gerrard.
Stu the Red » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:48 pm wrote:woof woof ! » Thu Jan 16, 2014 6:26 pm wrote:devaney » Thu Jan 16, 2014 5:11 pm wrote:We won 5-3 with a shi.t defence. Gerrard is the least of my worries
Yeah mate , if only half the muppets in here realised we've got far bigger things to worry about other than the legend that is Steven Gerrard.
Like the goalkeeper, most of the defence and adding another midfielder so Allen and Henderson don't have to play every game and Lucas never has to play!
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests