ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:42 pm wrote:Ben Patrick » Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:47 am wrote:As I have already said I think it is 100% the system that failed us against Villa.
Gerrard was hung out to dry for me and judging by the post on here he is being made a scapegoat.
For me if we had played Lucas instead of Gerrard in that system we would have struggled just as much.
We got overran until he changed the system and got the extra body in midfield.
On whether Gerrard can play in the Pirlo role I dont know but I wouldnt write him off just yet.
He has played it twice and while we have conceded goals in these games I dont think you can lay the blame squarely at his feet.
We will see next game with Lucas out how he does with Allen and Henderson ahead of him.
The same two players that Lucas had in front of him when the midfield looked at its best away at Spurs in Gerrards absence.
If he struggles then, then the people doubting and criticising him will be within their right.
Until then I dont think it has been fair at all personally.
By the way that wont be Rodgers experimenting at a crucial time him playing him there. We dont really have a choice with Lucas being injured.
Bar one or two games I don't think the midfield has functioned when Gerrard has played, and that goes back to the start of the season.
The only time our midfield looked anything like a cohesive unit was when Gerrard was out injured.
He wasn't helped by the formation on Saturday but the week before he was very poor against Stoke, luckily we were bailed out by our strikers.
Lucas being out is a massive blow and will probably cost us a CL place, stoke and villa are ordinary sides but with Gerard in the pirlo role they gave us all sorts of trouble, wait till we play a decent side like Everton in 8 days time.
Rubbish.
Gerrard wasn't "very poor" against Stoke by any stretch of the imagination and I think its laughable you're using that as an example. He was sloppy at times, but won plenty of tackles in the match (something Lucas gets bummed for) and found player in dangerous positions, he contributed very much to the attacking play with some of his own passing and movement.
It wasn't a great performance, but to describe it "very poor" to suit your own agenda is quite simply wrong.
Again the other day, people are questioning his performance, yet completely fail to acknowledge his massive improvement in the second half.
People are making out like Henderson and Lucas are actually better options, which again is quite simply laughable. Lucas doesn't do anything. The most positive thing you can say about him is his passing is usually steady and he finds a red shirt... Personally, I'd expect a little bit more from a midfielder than someone who simply passes the buck every chance they get.
Henderson's form has since returned to normal after a few games where he looked to have improved his level and unfortunately Allen has been injury prone and unable to establish himself.
A midfield of Allen, Henderson and Gerrard would be our strongest at present.